Search results

Intro -- المقدمة -- الفصل التمهيدي -- الفصل الأول : مفهوم الإرهاب الفكري -- الفصل الثاني : الإرهاب الفكري بين الأديان السماوية والفكر العلماني -- الفصل الثالث : أسباب الإرهاب الفكري -- الفصل الرابع : أهم سلوكيات الإرهاب الفكري -- الفصل الخامس : الإرهاب الفكري وأهم أشكاله الممارسة -- الفصل السادس : بين الحرية الفكرية والإرهاب الفكري -- الفصل السابع : أهم سبل الوقاية من الإرهاب الفكري -- الخاتمة -- المراجع -- فهرس

Intro -- تقديم -- الإسلام في أوروبا: إعادة اكتشاف الذات -- مسلمو أوروبا: أطوار الاعتدال والتطرف -- الإسلام الأوروبي: إشكاليات مفاهيمية -- الإسلام الأوروبي: صراع الهوية والاندماج -- مسلمو أوروبا بين الديني والعلماني -- سؤال المرجعية: نحو فقه جديد لمسلمي أوروبا -- الإسلام السياسي والجالية الجزائرية في فرنسا -- أطروحة الاندماج عند طارق رمضان -- المسلمون البريطانيون أم المسلمون في بريطانيا؟ -- الإسلام والغرب: معوقات التحاور والتجاور -- الإسلام بين المنظورين الأميركي والأوروبي -- الوجود الإسلامي والتفاعل الحضاري في الغرب

Intro -- الإهداء -- المقدمة -- الفصل الأول : الدين والسياسة في إسرائيل -- الفصل الثاني : نشأة الصهيونية الدينية واتجاهاتها -- الفصل الثالث : الصهيونية الدينية وآليات مراكمة القوة -- الفصل الرابع : أنماط تأثير الصهيونية الدينية على البيئة الداخلية -- الفصل الخامس : صعود الصهيونية الدينية وتداعياته الإقليمية -- المراجع -- فهرس المحتويات

Il rapporto tra diritto e religioni assume storicamente dei connotati problematici, soprattutto con riferimento a quelle religioni che cercano direttamente dall'assoluto i principi di convivenza umana, ponendosi molte volte in contrasto con principi contrattualistici e valori laici. Il loro intreccio torna un tema di vitale importanza all'indomani degli attentati dell'11 settembre, che segnano l'inizio di quella che viene più volte identificata come "guerra di civiltà". Il contrasto tra norme di carattere religioso e norme giuridiche pone delicati problemi interpretativi e di collocazione concettuale. Accentuate dal pluralismo religioso e globalizzazione le relazioni con il diritto tendono sempre ad ampliare la loro coesistenza, l'equilibrio che sembrava essere stato raggiunto è oggigiorno minato dagli attentati di matrice islamica e lo sciacallaggio politico-mediatico che alzano un muro sull'integrazione giuridica e sociale tra i popoli. È arduo compito, ancora una volta, di illuminati pensatori ristabilire gli equilibri tramite interpretazioni dialoganti e visioni lungimiranti di pace e prosperità umana. ; The relationship between law and religion historically takes on the problematic connotations, especially with reference to those religions who directly seek the absolute principles of human coexistence, often contradicting contractual principles and lay values. Their intertwining returns to a vital theme after the September 11 attacks, marking the beginning of what is often identified as a "civil war". The contrast between religious norms and legal norms poses delicate interpretative problems and conceptual placement. Accentuated by religious pluralism and globalization, relations with the law tend to widen their coexistence, the balance that seemed to have been achieved is nowadays undermined by Islamist matrix attacks and political-media marriages that raise a wall on legal and social among peoples. It is once again a difficult task for illuminated thinkers to restore balance through dialogic interpretations and forward-looking visions of peace and human prosperity.

Resumo:O artigo trata da relação entre religião e política na definição de comportamentos políticos em debate na esfera pública institucional brasileira, procurando mostrar como o tema da secularização do Estado pode ser trabalhado sob a perspectiva da diferenciação funcional, tal qual utilizada na teoria social de Niklas Luhmann. Na busca de uma compreensão sistêmica da comunicação religiosa e de sua complexa aliança com a moral socialmente difundida, levantar-se-á a hipótese da reprodução de uma seletividade dos discursos sobre o secularismo no Brasil, que, longe de garantir a equidistância estatal em relação às diversas crenças, possibilita uma ocupação privilegiada do espaço público por determinados grupos religiosos na pauta discursiva sobre diversas políticas públicas.Palavras-chave:Religião e Política; Diferenciação Funcional; Esfera Pública; Laicidade Abstract:The paper discusses the relationship between religion and politics in the definition of political behavior in institutional public sphere in Brazil, trying to show how the theme of secularization of the state can be worked from the perspective of functional differentiation, conceptual categories used in Niklas Luhmann's social theory. In search of a systemic understanding of religious communication and its alliance with the complex moral socially pervasive, it will raise the chance of playing a selectivity of discourses on secularism in Brazil, which, far from guaranteeing the impartiality state in relation the diverse beliefs, enables a privileged occupation of public space by certain religious groups in discursive agenda on various public policies.Keywords:Religion and Politics; Functional Differentiation; Public Sphere; Secularism

This paper analyses the role of the principle of secularism with respect to the consolidation of the democratic 'host' nations which confront themselves with other cultural and religious identities. The aim is pursued by a revisitation of the concept, in the light of the philosophy of ideas. The core of the argumentation is the following: both liberal and liberal-democratic western states are grounded on what contemporary scholars, proving true John Locke, call the subtle art of distinction among spheres and dimensions of individual and collective life. This must be reconsidered nowadays in order to tackle properly the struggle among groups whose specific symbolic internal cohesion is based on forms of religious identity.

The essay analyzes some aspects of the freedom of religion enshrined in the Italian Constitution in relation to the principle of secularism as supreme principle of the Italian Republic, according to the definition of the italian Constitutional Court; and the extension of religious symbols and, in particular, the crucifix. First of all, the essay analyzes the question of «Italian» secularism, verifying the disparities and similarities among the various declinations of this principle, reconstructing the debate in the constituent assembly and the main jurisprudential approaches of the Italian Constitutional Court in this matter. Secondly, the essay analyzes the issue of religious symbols in public spaces and, in particular, a leading case concerning the exhibition of the crucifix in the classrooms, both at the jurisprudence level (Administrative Judge, Constitutional Court, EDU Court), and at doctrinal one. The essay, then, notes the cd. Bavarian solution, adopted by the Government of the homonymous German region, in search of a reconciliation between the religious freedom of each person and the quantitative factor per single religion. There is also an excursus on the main case law of the European Court of Human Rights about secularity, religious freedom and religious symbols. ; Il saggio analizza alcuni aspetti relativi alla libertà di religione sancita dalla Costituzione italiana in relazione al principio di laicità quale principio supremo dello Stato italiano, secondo la definizione della Corte costituzionale e all'ostensione dei simboli religiosi e, in particolare, il crocifisso. Anzitutto, il saggio analizza la questione della laicità «all'italiana», verificando le dissomiglianze e similitudini delle differenti declinazioni di tale principio, ricostruendo il dibattito in Assemblea costituente e i principali approdi giurisprudenziali della Corte costituzionale italiana in materia. In secondo luogo, viene analizzata la tematica relativa ai simboli religiosi negli spazi pubblici e, in particolare, un leading case ...