Search results

The article is devoted to the history of the emergence and formation of the institution of trust property in relation to various legal systems. The purpose of such a historical analysis of the institution of trust property is to find a possible place of this legal institution in domestic law, because trust property is a relatively new legal construct for Ukrainian law. The relevance of the article is to study the possibility of using the Anglo-American Trust Institute in Ukraine. The object of the study of this article is the legal relations arising from the institute of trust property. Methods of historicism, method of logic, method of analysis, method of synthesis, method of systematic research, and comparative-legal method were used in the study. The authors concluded that the institution of trust property goes back to one of the branches of English law. At the same time, the institution of trust is not inherent in the domestic legal system. However, since the 1990s, the domestic legislator has tried several times to introduce the relevant institution into Ukrainian legislation. So far, all of these attempts have failed.

One aspect not sufficiently considered in solving the social dilemma of redistribution of wealth is the mediating role of trust. In this article, I present preliminary evidence in this regard. Later, I consider several mechanisms that may explain the observed levels of interpersonal trust in 54 countries included in the fifth World Values ​​Survey (2005-2008). The results of a multivariate statistical model indicate that the best performing variables are the level of wealth, political stability, with a negative effect , participation and inclusion in decision -making processes . However, an analysis of the levels of interpersonal trust based on surveys conducted between 1996 and Latinobarometer 2010 shows partly different results. Later models could resolve this disparity considering the variety of historical trajectories in each region or modeling the effect of mechanisms from social, economic and political structure differently. ; Un aspecto no suficientemente considerado en la solución del dilema social de la redistribución de la riqueza es el papel mediador de la confianza. En este artículo presento evidencia preliminar a este respecto. Posteriormente considero varios mecanismos que pueden explicar los niveles de confianza interpersonal observados en 54 países incluidos en la quinta Encuesta Mundial de Valores (2005-2008). Los resultados de un modelo estadístico multivariado indican que las variables con mejor desempeño son el nivel de riqueza, la estabilidad política y, con un efecto negativo, la participación einclusión en los procesos de toma de decisión. Sin embargo, un análisis de los niveles de confianza interpersonal con base en las encuestas del Latinobarómetrorealizadas entre 1996 y 2010 arroja resultados parcialmente distintos. Modelos posteriores podrían resolver esta disparidad tomando en cuenta la variedad de trayectorias históricas en cada región o modelando el efecto de los mecanismos derivados de la estructura social, económica y política de modo distinto.

One aspect not sufficiently considered in solving the social dilemma of redistribution of wealth is the mediating role of trust. In this article, I present preliminary evidence in this regard. Later, I consider several mechanisms that may explain the observed levels of interpersonal trust in 54 countries included in the fifth World Values ​​Survey (2005-2008). The results of a multivariate statistical model indicate that the best performing variables are the level of wealth, political stability, with a negative effect , participation and inclusion in decision -making processes . However, an analysis of the levels of interpersonal trust based on surveys conducted between 1996 and Latinobarometer 2010 shows partly different results. Later models could resolve this disparity considering the variety of historical trajectories in each region or modeling the effect of mechanisms from social, economic and political structure differently. ; Un aspecto no suficientemente considerado en la solución del dilema social de la redistribución de la riqueza es el papel mediador de la confianza. En este artículo presento evidencia preliminar a este respecto. Posteriormente considero varios mecanismos que pueden explicar los niveles de confianza interpersonal observados en 54 países incluidos en la quinta Encuesta Mundial de Valores (2005-2008). Los resultados de un modelo estadístico multivariado indican que las variables con mejor desempeño son el nivel de riqueza, la estabilidad política y, con un efecto negativo, la participación einclusión en los procesos de toma de decisión. Sin embargo, un análisis de los niveles de confianza interpersonal con base en las encuestas del Latinobarómetrorealizadas entre 1996 y 2010 arroja resultados parcialmente distintos. Modelos posteriores podrían resolver esta disparidad tomando en cuenta la variedad de trayectorias históricas en cada región o modelando el efecto de los mecanismos derivados de la estructura social, económica y política de modo distinto.

One aspect not sufficiently considered in solving the social dilemma of redistribution of wealth is the mediating role of trust. In this article, I present preliminary evidence in this regard. Later, I consider several mechanisms that may explain the observed levels of interpersonal trust in 54 countries included in the fifth World Values ​​Survey (2005-2008). The results of a multivariate statistical model indicate that the best performing variables are the level of wealth, political stability, with a negative effect , participation and inclusion in decision -making processes . However, an analysis of the levels of interpersonal trust based on surveys conducted between 1996 and Latinobarometer 2010 shows partly different results. Later models could resolve this disparity considering the variety of historical trajectories in each region or modeling the effect of mechanisms from social, economic and political structure differently. ; Un aspecto no suficientemente considerado en la solución del dilema social de la redistribución de la riqueza es el papel mediador de la confianza. En este artículo presento evidencia preliminar a este respecto. Posteriormente considero varios mecanismos que pueden explicar los niveles de confianza interpersonal observados en 54 países incluidos en la quinta Encuesta Mundial de Valores (2005-2008). Los resultados de un modelo estadístico multivariado indican que las variables con mejor desempeño son el nivel de riqueza, la estabilidad política y, con un efecto negativo, la participación einclusión en los procesos de toma de decisión. Sin embargo, un análisis de los niveles de confianza interpersonal con base en las encuestas del Latinobarómetrorealizadas entre 1996 y 2010 arroja resultados parcialmente distintos. Modelos posteriores podrían resolver esta disparidad tomando en cuenta la variedad de trayectorias históricas en cada región o modelando el efecto de los mecanismos derivados de la estructura social, económica y política de modo distinto.

The objective of the work is to investigate the relationship between social trust and social indifference of citizens. The sample of study is students of the Islamic Azad University of Kerman. In this research, the opinions of Fukuyama, Giddens and Hirschi have been used. The statistical population of research consists of all students of Islamic Azad University of Kerman in 2017 and the sample of the research has been estimated at 400. The research sampling method is a kind of probabilistic methods and has been sorted by clustering method. The results of multivariate regression analysis indicate: cultural trust variable had the most significant effect on the social indifference. This coefficient has been reported negative to be -0.274. After that, the social class has the greatest effect on the social indifference. This is a negative coefficient of -0.230. On the other hand, the relationship between public trust and political trust with social indifference has also been reported significant and negative.

La confianza política ha sido identificada como uno de los indicadores centrales de la adhesión de los ciudadanos a su sistema político y, en especial, a la democracia. Como consecuencia de esto, investigadores han planteado que existe una estrecha relación entre confianza y participación política. Sin embargo, las características de dicha relación no han sido del todo definidas en la literatura comparada. En este artículo exploro la relación entre confianza y participación política en América Latina utilizando datos de lapop 2014. Sostengo que los individuos que más confían en sus instituciones tienden a participar en mayor medida en modalidades de participación convencionales, mientras que aquellos que desconfían más de sus instituciones utilizan otros mecanismos, como las protestas. En esa relación, la eficacia política ocupa un lugar importante en los mecanismos de participación convencional.

Citizen trust in the public administration has been reduced worldwide due to recent events such as the current economic situation, corruption cases or disclosure of classified information. This work analyzes whether e-government related actions could be strategically employed to increase citizen trust in the public administration. This research confirms that perceived quality of public e-services has a positive effect on trust in the public administration. In turn, public administration communication (i.e., campaigns to promote the benefits and use of e-government) only influence trust in the public administration for citizens with a favorable attitude towards e-government. These results have interesting implications suggesting in which ways public administration should invest their limited resources in order to recover the levels of citizen trust.

Political trust is essential for a democratic regime to work, and a declining asset in Western countries. It has been confirmed theoretically and empirically that news media are an important source of influence on political trust, though literature have not considered social media, in which the circulation of false or misleading information, and propaganda, might have a negative effect on political trust, to be relevant channels of news consumption. In order to explore the effect of social media on political trust in comparison with that of traditional media, an ANOVA test and hierarchical multiple linear regression models were run on a three-wave panel survey, during the presidential elections of 2018 (N = 701) in Mexico. The findings indicate that the election campaign had a positive effect on institutional trust, growing as the campaign developed, and that there was a positive influence from social media, followed by television. ; La confianza política es esencial para la funcionalidad de un régimen democrático y un activo a la baja en los países occidentales. Los medios de comunicación se han confirmado teórica y empíricamente como una fuente importante de influencia en ello, aunque los estudios no suelen considerar a las redes sociodigitales como canales relevantes de consumo informativo, donde la circulación de información falsa, engañosa o propagandística pudiera afectar negativamente la confianza política. Para esclarecer el peso que sobre dicha actitud tiene la atención a medios informativos, tanto tradicionales como sociodigitales, se realiza una prueba ANOVA y modelos de regresión sobre una encuesta tipo panel de tres olas, aplicada a nivel nacional en la campaña presidencial de 2018 en México (N=701). Los hallazgos señalan un efecto positivo de la campaña en la confianza institucional, pues esta crece conforme aquella transcurre, así como una influencia positiva de las redes sociodigitales en aquella, seguido de la televisión.