Human Biomonitoring Data Enables Evidence-Informed Policy to Reduce Internal Exposure to Persistent Organic Compounds: A Case Study

Abstract

Human biomonitoring (HBM) monitors levels of environmental pollutants in human samples, which often is a topic of concern for residents near industrially contaminated sites (ICSs). Around an ICS area in Menen (Belgium), including a (former) municipal waste incinerator and a metal recovery plant, increasing environmental concentrations of dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were observed, causing growing concern among residents and authorities. The local community succeeded in convincing the responsible authorities to investigate the problem and offer research funding. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) were measured in two consecutive HBM studies (2002-2006 and 2010-2011), in the context of the Flemish Environment and Health Study (FLEHS), as well as in soil and locally produced food. Meanwhile, local authorities discouraged consumption of locally produced food in a delineated area of higher exposure risk. Ultimately, HBM and environmental data enabled tailored dietary recommendations. This article demonstrates the usefulness of HBM in documenting the body burdens of residents near the ICS, identifying exposure routes, evaluating remediating actions and providing information for tailored policy strategies aiding to further exposure reduction. It also highlights the role of the local stakeholders as an example of community-based participatory research and how such an approach can create societal support for research and policy. ; Funding: The HBM studies were conducted within the framework of the Flemish Center of Expertise on Environment and Health (FLEHS 2002–2006 and 2007–2011), funded by the Flemish Government, Department of Environment & Spatial Development, Flemish Planning Bureau for the Environment and Spatial Development (formally: Department of Environment, Nature & Energy); Department of Economics, Science and Innovation and the Flemish Agency for Care and Health. The scienceto-policy process of the HBM results was funded by the Department of Environment & Spatial Development, Flemish Planning Bureau for the Environment and Spatial Development (formally: Department of Environment, Nature & Energy) and the Flemish Agency for Care and Health. The egg study was funded by the Government of Flanders, Department of Environment & Spatial Development, Flemish Planning Bureau for the Environment and Spatial Development (formally: Department of Environment, Nature & Energy); the Flemish Agency for Care and Health and the Flanders Environment Agency. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and are not necessarily endorsed by the Flemish Government. Acknowledgments: The authors wish to express their gratitude to the participants of the studies for their cooperation and to the study nurses and study fieldworkers for their contribution to the study. We also thank the SGS laboratory for collection and analysis of the egg samples and Josworld for designing the leaflet on dietary recommendations for consumption of home-produced eggs.