Suchergebnisse

Over the last two decades there has been a growing debate on the supposedly negative relation between ethnic diversity, public goods production and social cohesion. Despite the amount of evidence, existing in-depth qualitative reviews conclude that the literature is inconclusive. Advancing upon their work, I conduct a quantitative review of over 480 empirical findings from 172 studies. Rather than seeing the huge literature as consisting of an incomparable mass of studies, I argue that the diversity of the literature allows us to analyse the robustness of the general association (does it hold for the comparison of Nepalese villages and European countries alike?) and the conditions under which it is more likely to appear. Accordingly, the review fine-tunes the conclusions we can draw from the existing evidence by noting that the debate has generally produced slightly more confirmatory than confuting evidence. But more importantly, this tendency for validating findings increases considerably under certain conditions: (1) inquiries from regions of the world with rather salient ethnic boundaries, (2) analysis of small-scale neighbourhood contexts and (3) a focus on trust related sentiments or public goods production as outcomes. A rather problematic result of the review is that discipline matters: In comparison to findings published in political science or sociology journals, a considerably larger percentage of findings that are published in economics journals are confirmatory. I conclude by suggesting that interdisciplinary work is necessary and should focus on the conditions under which ethnic diversity is a significant predictor of public goods production and social cohesion. (author's abstract)

Das vorliegende Arbeitspapier (es handelt sich um einen Auszug aus der Habilitationsschrift des Autors) versucht eine Annäherung an eine Theorie des Kredits nicht über die Geldtheorie, sondern über den Ansatz einer generellen Theorie des Tausches. Geldwirtschaft und Geld sind aus dieser Perspektive nur partikuläre Fälle des Tausches. Um diese Konzeption konsistent durchführen zu können, klärt der Autor die Bedeutung der anderen zentralen Konzepte Geld, Interesse und Profit, teilweise unter Rückgriff auf den Marx'schen politökonomischen Ansatz. Der "Geldfetischismus" wird erst in Gesellschaften wirksam, in denen das Geld als Kapital fungiert. Marx entnimmt wichtige Motive seiner Kritik der "verkehrenden Macht des Geldes" aus einer alten Tradition, die bis in die frühe Antike zurückreicht, wie der Autor nachweist. Eingegangen wird weiterhin auf die Geldanalyse Georg Simmels und die Geldtheorie systemtheoretischer Provenienz. (ICE)

Benutzerkommentar

Demonstrating Richard Rorty's breadth of scholarship and his influence on diverse issues across the social sciences and humanities, this comprehensive bibliography contains 1,165 citations. A unique reference work on neo-pragmatism, this bibliography is essential for anyone researching Rorty's work and its impact on philosophy, literature, the arts, religion, the social sciences, politics, and education