Suchergebnisse

Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) is the process of registering land for the first time, which is carried out simultaneously and includes all objects of land registration that have not been registered in an area. Through this program, the government guarantees legal certainty or rights to land owned by the community. However, the importance of land registration in Indonesia has not been followed by a good understanding by the community. Many lands in Indonesia that have not been certified are due to various factors that prevent communities from registering ownership rights to their land. This study aims to describe the implementation of the PTSL program and analyze the program related to its role in resolving land disputes in Indonesia. This study is qualitative research and used an interpretive paradigm. Data collection techniques were carried out through literature studies and focus group discussions. The results showed that PTSL is not a form of agrarian reform at the implementation level. The PTSL program still has things that have the potential to become problems in the future, including the implementation of PTSL is still fertile with the practice of extortion, potential claims on land after certification are still often occurred, and the non-functioning of the publicity and delimitation contradictory principle has resulted in many land conflicts/disputes.

As an acceleration program for land registration in Indonesia that is directly led by the President, Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) should provide a guarantee of legal certainty and protection regarding land ownership rights. However, in fact, the role of the land deed official (PPAT), as a public official who receives a mandate from the Governmental Regulation no. 24 of 1997 regarding Land Registration, is not found within the implementation of PTSL. The present research aimed to investigate the role of PPAT in the implementation of PTSL. Using normative legal approach, this study employed literature study to collect the primary data. This research found that PPAT does not have any role in regulatory legislation regarding PTSL. If we see Governmental Regulation no. 24 of 1997, all transfers occurring after the issuance of the regulation requires PPAT's deed as written evidence of land ownership. The adjudication committee as the PTSL implementer supposes to collaborate with PPAT to make sure that PTSL meets the steps of juridical data collection in order to obtain an orderly, complete land registration that provides legal certainty regarding land ownership right.

An aspect of good governance is an effective system of land administration. A central component of this is the comprehensive registration of rural property title by the state to create more secure and legally protected tenure for farmers and cultivators. In response to the need for comprehensive land titling in rural areas in most states of Southeast Asia, major reform programs have been implemented to this end in recent years. However, constraints have been encountered, resulting in only variable progress in achieving comprehensive registration, especially of small land holdings. These constraints will be examined in the article in relation to both individual and communal tenure. Also considered will be institutional constraints that have impeded registration. In conclusion the article will explain the impediments in title registration in relation to three sets of factors: poor standards of governance, receptivity of traditional communities to title registration and policy capture of title registration by business and bureaucratic elites.

Complete systematic land registration is regulated in Ministerial Regulation Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete systematic land registration.Ministerial Regulation Number 6 of 2018 concerning Complete systematic land registration. Land registration is a form of implementation of government obligations to ensure certainty and protection of land ownership. The Government has guaranteed the legal certainty by Article 19 of Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Agrarian Principles. Implementing the Basic Agrarian Law related to complete systematic land registration, in the Minister of Agrarian Regulation No. 6 of 2018 concerning Complete Systematic Land Registration, Article 22 states that if you do not have evidence, then in good faith, make a statement. This study will discuss the excellent faith theory of complete systematic registration in realizing legal certainty. As a guarantor in complete systematic land registration, the state guarantees the truth of the land registered in good faith.

Public perception of land services is still unsatisfactory. In such conditions, changing the land administration system to electronic is necessary. The digitalization of the land registration process can run well and adequately, so clear and consistent rules are needed formally and materially. On the other hand, government agencies apply legal rules consistently to submit and obey the laws they make. That certainty of land rights, subject of rights, and objects of rights can be guaranteed. The type of research used is empirical, using statutory, conceptual, and legal sociological approaches. The analysis used is qualitative. Based on the research results, it is known that something that arises with digitized land registration will have a positive trend in the process. After all, it will significantly impact the community because it is time-efficient and transparent and can be done independently without brokers. The community's obligation to visit the land office will reduce archival data. People don't need to be afraid of it being lost, burned or flooded because it has been stored through an adequate system with an organized security system.

In this study using normative legal research. Policies related to land are required to guarantee legal certainty and certainty of land ownership rights by every person (individual) or by legal entities. So the community needs to register land in order to obtain a certificate of land rights which serves as a strong means of proof of ownership of land rights by someone. Meanwhile, Article 19 paragraph (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law states that to ensure legal certainty by the Government, land registration is held throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. This is done so that land owners can obtain legal certainty for the land they have owned, and it's intended that rights holders obtain valid evidence in the form of certificates as a strong means of proof as holders of rights to the land they own. Starting from the description above, the researcher can provide several aspects of the study, including: First, the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) target is so large that it's not an easy job for the Pasuruan Regency land office, which has 29 State Civil Servants, assisted by 63 non-government employees, due to the limited number of existing staff, the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) land office in Pasuruan Regency involves; 1. The private sector as a third party helping 20,200 fields for measurement and mapping activities, 2. Community participation in assissting Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) in village locations for 10,100 respectively, and 29,700 fields carried out and carried out by the Pasuruan Regency Land Office ASN.

In this era, technology is playing a central role in many areas of human life, but the classical hardcopy-based approaches are still being used for land registration. The Internet-based methods provide excellent facilities for overcoming the drawbacks handwritten-based style and communication among different government sectors. Nowadays, the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is used to build professional electronic systems as big steps towards the Electronic government (E-government) system. One of the most important section of the E-government is the E-Land-Registration (ELR). Duhok Land Directorate, together with its sub-directorates work on a huge amount of data to process. These directorates suffer from the classical hardcopy-based approaches, so building an ELR system will reduce both the time consumption and paper waste. The improvement of the land registration system will also allow integration with the E-government system. The improvement of the land registration will enable communication between the land registration staff in one side and administration and financial directorates on the other. In this thesis, an efficient ELR system for Duhok land registration is proposed. The services of the database management system cover Employee Registration Module, Estates Registration Module, Operation Type Module, Estate Owners Module, Estate Status Module, View Information Module, and Login Employee Module. HTML, CSS, PHP, MySQL, JavaScript, jQuery, Ajax, and Bootstrap tools were used for the design and implementation stages of the proposed ELR. ; TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENT……….……………………………………….……………………….……HA TA! YER İŞARETİ TANIMLANMAMIŞ. TABLE OF CONTENTS .III LIST OF FIGURES.VI LIST OF TABLES.VIII ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOL LISTS.IX ÖZET.XI ABSTRACT.X 1. INTRODUCTION . 1 1.1. The Aim of Study. 3 1.2. Thesis Outline . 3 2. LITERATURE REVIEW . 4 2.1. Electronic DDLRS Development Tools……………….……………………………………….10 2.2. HTML . 10 2.3. CSS. 11 2.4. AJAX. 11 2.5. BOOTSTRAP. 12 2.6. JAVASCRIPT . 12 2.7. PHP . 13 2.8. MYSQL . 13 2.9. WWW . 14 2.10. WEB SERVER . 14 2.11. E-Government . 14 2.12. Database . 15 2.13. Database Management System (DBMS) . 16 2.14. Land Registration . 16 3. THE DESIGN AND STRUCTURE OF THE PROPOSED EMLRS. 18 3.1. Introduction. 18 3.2.The architecture of the EMLRS . 18 3.3. Mechanism of EMLRS Design . 19 3.4. System Requirements. 20 3.4.1. FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT . 20 3.4.2. NONFUNCTIONAL REQUIRMENTS. 21 3.4.3. SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS . 22 3.4.4. HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS . 22 3.5. Proposed Duhok DLR Modules. 23 3.6. Modules of Proposed System. 24 3.6.1. EMPLOYEE REGISTRATION MODULE(EMRM). 24 3.6.2. ESTATES REGISTRATION MODULE(ESRM). 26 3.6.3. OPERATION TYPE MODULE(OTM). 27 3.6.4. ESTATE OWNERS MODULE(ESOM). 28 3.6.5. ESTATE ESTATUS MODULE(ESM). 29 3.6.6. VIEW INFORMATION MODULE(VIM). 31 3.6.7. LOGIN EMPLOYEE MODULE(LEM) . 34 3.7. Database design of E-Duhok DLR for DLR . 35 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION . 37 4.1. Introduction. 37 4.2. E-Duhok DLRS . 37 4.3. Employee Information Panel . 38 iv 4.4. Land Registration . 39 4.5. Land View Details (information) . 40 4.5.1. LAND OWNERS . 41 4.5.2. LAND BORDERS. 41 4.5.3. UPDATE AREA . 42 4.5.4. EMPLOYEE APPROVING . 42 4.5.5. EDIT LAND . 42 4.5.6. SPLIT AND JOIN LAND . 43 4.5.7. VALUE OF LAND . 44 4.5.8. UPDATE MAP. 45 4.5.9. LAND REPORT DOCUMENT . 45 4.6. Fee Type . 47 4.7. Land Status . 48 4.7.1. RESERVATION LAND . 48 4.7.2. MORTGAGE LAND . 49 4.8. Search Land . 50 4.9. Sample of Statistics . 50 5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK . 52 5.1. Conclusions. 52 5.2. Suggestions Future Work. 52 REFERENCES . 54 CURRICULUM VITAE. 57

Land is very closely related to human life. Everyone certainly needs land. Even not only in his life, but even to death, humans still need a piece of land. Along with increasing humanity from year to year, while the amount of land that can be controlled by humans is very limited, then the land becomes a very crucial problem for humans. In addition, with the advancement of the people's economy and the national economy, more and more land is involved in economic problems such as buying and selling land, leasing land and land as collateral for loans at the bank. In everyday life the land is often a dispute even to the court. This arises because land has functions and meanings that are very important for people's lives, which makes people try to acquire land in various ways even by grabbing land owned by others. As a result of land disputes that can lead to prolonged conflicts between community members who are in dispute to prevent the spread of land disputes, the government registers land which will later give birth to land certificates. The existence of a issued land certificate is proof of ownership of a plot of land, here the holder of the certificate of land rights has received legal protection and is guaranteed by law on the land it owns, meaning if there is a land dispute where the certificate is held by the certificate holder the certificate holder is strong and the judge is obliged to consider the certificate of evidence as a valid and strong evidence in addition to considering other evidence. Keywords: Issuance of Certificates, Land Registration