Suchergebnisse

The article discusses the prospects of increasing the investment attractiveness of Russian regions with the help of cluster policy tools and the formation of regional clusters as specific regional structures that allow solving many problems of spatial development of the subjects of the Russian Federation by obtaining a number of synergetic effects for the regional economy. At the same time, regional authorities should pay special attention to the cluster formation procedure itself, recognizing cluster initiatives in a timely manner and contributing to the processes of cluster formation in a natural way when the idea of their creation comes from the participants themselves, as well as effective support for existing clusters, helping them quickly adapt to changing macroeconomic conditions of functioning. Such an approach to cluster policy will, on the one hand, contribute to the implementation of only viable cluster initiatives, and on the other hand, will lead to a real improvement in the investment climate in the region.

A historical sketch of the development of biological education and science at Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University for the period 1959-1988 is given.

The article deals with the existing scientific approaches to the interpretation of the term "world order". Based on the analysis they are systematized into three key directions: institutional, ideological (axiological), and actor approach. Within the framework of the latter approach, there is a transition from the study of poles or centers of power to a statement of the fact of polycentricity of the new world order. For the completeness of the political science study of the world order the author considers it necessary to take into account besides the institutional design, configuration of actors, and value paradigm also the nature of society in which such an order is formed (post-information or network) and the state of globalization processes that determine the spatial characteristics of the world order (de-globalization, regionalization, and localization). Despite the difference in interpretations, different scientific schools are united by the thesis of the modern liberal world order crisis. The scientific debate revolves around the question of whether the world order is in a state of definite transition or whether the current non-equilibrium state can be considered as a new world order. The synergetic paradigm, or complexity theory, proposed as a research methodology, provides an answer. According to it, the formation of new world order is seen as a nonequilibrium nonlinear process defined by a dynamic synthesis of order and chaos. If there are specific political actors (institutions, interest groups, individuals) in the political space, their influence on the transformation of the political space is possible at bifurcation points and is predominantly random. This defines subjectlessness as a trend in the formation of new world order. From the point of view of finding a methodological basis for the research, the existing models of system dynamics, cyclic models, and simulation modeling were considered. It is determined that for the study of the new world order as a nonlinear dynamic complex system, it is ...

The phenomenon of «children's» movements has historical analogs, which traditionally were the result of thoughtful technologies of adults, which were aimed at realizing their interests and achieving specific goals. The use of geopolitical and civilizational approaches has led to the consideration of the phenomenon of «children's» eco-strikes as a political technology of the initiators of a New World Order. The genesis, essence and purpose of the «Greta Thunberg project» and mass environmental actions in the context of the formation of a New World Order and the interests of Russia have been characterized. It is shown that the initiators of this technology are the «old» globalist and neoliberal elites of Western states, part of the American establishment, international big capital and powerful corporations in the non-material digital sphere. To achieve their goals of neutralizing opponents in the economic and political spheres, they use the protest potential of the «greens», which over the past few decades have actually become part of the Western neoliberal elite. In the context of efforts to create a New World Order, these actors seek to maintain and strengthen their power, continue to exploit third world countries, suppress existing anti-system movements and weaken their main geopolitical competitors – mainly China and Russia, which are looking for safe transport routes and new sources of resources. Therefore, on the initiative of the globalist and neoliberal elites, projects are being put forward to create ecozones in resource-rich «disputed areas» and, as a result, to preserve the prospects for economic activity there. The image of «children's» eco-strikes, which is presented by the media, reproduces a new social idea and stimulates support from the electorate for the purpose of the transformation of the World Order, which is confirmed by the fact that the movement is massive in various countries of the world. Youth strikes with environmental slogans help to shift the dominant positions from the traditional industrial-resource elite to the digital elite, opening up new financial and economic opportunities and prospects for global leadership for the latter. The intensification of this movement coincided in time with the USA claims to the Northern Sea Route and the development of Arctic resources, which directly affects the interests of Russia.

The article deals with the existing scientific approaches to the interpretation of the term "world order". Based on the analysis they are systematized into three key directions: institutional, ideological (axiological), and actor approach. Within the framework of the latter approach, there is a transition from the study of poles or centers of power to a statement of the fact of polycentricity of the new world order. For the completeness of the political science study of the world order the author considers it necessary to take into account besides the institutional design, configuration of actors, and value paradigm also the nature of society in which such an order is formed (post-information or network) and the state of globalization processes that determine the spatial characteristics of the world order (de-globalization, regionalization, and localization). Despite the difference in interpretations, different scientific schools are united by the thesis of the modern liberal world order crisis. The scientific debate revolves around the question of whether the world order is in a state of definite transition or whether the current non-equilibrium state can be considered as a new world order. The synergetic paradigm, or complexity theory, proposed as a research methodology, provides an answer. According to it, the formation of new world order is seen as a nonequilibrium nonlinear process defined by a dynamic synthesis of order and chaos. If there are specific political actors (institutions, interest groups, individuals) in the political space, their influence on the transformation of the political space is possible at bifurcation points and is predominantly random. This defines subjectlessness as a trend in the formation of new world order. From the point of view of finding a methodological basis for the research, the existing models of system dynamics, cyclic models, and simulation modeling were considered. It is determined that for the study of the new world order as a nonlinear dynamic complex system, it is advisable to analyze the megatrends of world politics and deconstruct them using the "method-assemblage" of a constantly changing reality. ; У статті розглянуті існуючі наукові підходи до інтерпретації терміну «світовий порядок». На підставі проведеного аналізу вони систематизовані до трьох ключових напрямків: інституційний, ідеологічний (аксіологічний) та акторний. В межах останнього підходу відбувається перехід від дослідження окремих полюсів чи центрів сили до констатації факту поліцентричності нового світового порядку. Для повноти політологічного дослідження світового порядку автор вважає за необхідне враховувати окрім інституційного дизайну, конфігурації акторів та ціннісної парадигми також характер суспільства, в якому формується такий порядок («пост-інформаційне» або «мережеве») та стан глобалізаційних процесів, що визначає просторові характеристики світопорядку (де-глобалізація, регіоналізація та локалізація). Попри різницю в інтерпретаціях, різні наукові школи поєднує теза щодо кризи сучасного ліберального світопорядку. Наукова дискусія розгортається навколо питання, чи перебуває світовий порядок у стані певного переходу, або поточний нерівноважний стан може вважатися новим світопорядком. Відповідь дозволяє надати синергетична парадигма, або теорія складності, що запропонована в якості методології дослідження. Відповідно до неї формування нового світового порядку розглядається як нерівноважний нелінійний процес, що визначається динамічним синтезом порядку та хаосу. При наявності у політичному просторі конкретних політичних акторів (інститути, групи інтересів, окремі індивіди), їх вплив на трансформацію політичного простору можливий у точках біфуркації та має переважно випадковий характер. Це визначає безсуб'єктність як тренд формування нового світопорядку. З точки зору пошуку методичних засад дослідження розглянуті існуючі моделі системної динаміки, циклічні моделі та імітаційне моделювання. Визначено, що для дослідження нового світопорядку як нелінійної динамічної складної системи, доцільними є моделі аналізу мегатрендів світової політики та їх деконструкція за допомогою «методу-збірки» реальності, що постійно змінюється.

Theoretical and methodological approaches to the interpretation and analysis of the world order are analyzed and generalized. The key issues of the influence of democratization processes on the formation of a new world order are considered. It is determined that the essence of the new world order is to build a single, interconnected and global world, the renunciation of the supremacy of nation-states and the priority of universal interests. It is substantiated that in order to solve the problems of democratization in the new world order, it is necessary to implement the following principles: it is the inevitable orientation of Western democracies to their own fundamental values: freedom, human rights, tolerance, democracy, rule of law and social market economy; it is the recognition of the need for and respect for an international order based on common values, law, harmony, cooperation and participation in governance, the possibility of political, economic, social and cultural involvement in the construction of a globalized world; it is political determination and military ability to repel new threats. Both of these components are necessary for the reliable destruction of totalitarian networks and anti-humanist ideologies.It is noted that the spread of democratic institutions within the country was often accompanied by the collapse of democracy and the dominance of large powers at the interstate level, where the most important decisions had to be made on the world economy, proliferation and environmental protection. Liberal democracy, because it is the opposite of social democracy, is not responsible for meeting the needs of the most vulnerable societies. Adhering to the concept of world order and other normative-critical views, it can be noted that there is a possibility of devolution of the democratic mechanism of decision-making both at the regional, international level and at the level of self-government. The process of democratization is one of the elements in the effective construction of a new world order.Key words: democracy, democratization, new world order, international order, globalization, geopolitics. ; Проаналізовано та узагальнено теоретико-методологічних підходів тлумачення та аналізу світового порядку. Розглянуто ключові питання впливу демократизаційних процесів на формування нового світового порядку. Визначено, що суть нового світового порядку полягає в побудові єдиного, взаємопов'язаного і глобального світу, відмову від верховенства національних держав і пріоритеті загальнолюдських інтересів.Обґрунтовано, що для вирішення проблем демократизації в умовах нового світового порядку, необхідно реалізувати наступні принципи: це неодмінна орієнтація західних демократій на власні фундаментальні цінності: свободу, права людини, толерантність, демократію, верховенство права і соціальну ринкову економіку; це визнання необхідності і повагу міжнародного порядку, заснованого на спільних цінностях, на праві, злагоді, співробітництво та участі в управлінні, можливість політичного, економічного, соціального і культурного залучення до будівництва глобалізованого світу; це політична рішучість і військова здатність відобразити нові загрози. Обидва цих компонента необхідні для надійного знищення тоталітарних мереж і антигуманістичних ідеологій.Ключові слова: демократія, демократизація, новий світовий порядок, міжнародний порядок, глобалізація, геополітика. Проанализированы и обобщены теоретико-методологические подходы толкования и анализа мирового порядка. Рассмотрены ключевые вопросы влияния демократических процессов на формирование нового мирового порядка. Определено, что суть нового мирового порядка состоит в построении единого, взаимосвязанного глобального мира, отказ от верховенства национальных государств и приоритете общечеловеческих интересов. Обосновано, что для решения проблем демократизации в условиях нового мирового порядка, необходимо реализовать следующие принципы: это непременное ориентация западных демократий на собственные фундаментальные ценности: свободу, права человека, толерантность, демократию, верховенство права и социальную рыночную экономику; это признание необходимости и уважение международного порядка, основанного на общих ценностях, на праве, согласии, сотрудничестве и участии в управлении, возможность политического, экономического, социального и культурного привлечения к строительству глобализирующегося мира; это политическая решимость и военная способность отразить новые угрозы. Оба этих компонента необходимы для надежного уничтожения тоталитарных сетей и антигуманистических идеологий.Ключевые слова: демократия, демократизация, новый мировой порядок, международный порядок, глобализация, геополитика. Theoretical and methodological approaches to the interpretation and analysis of the world order are analyzed and generalized. The key issues of the influence of democratization processes on the formation of a new world order are considered. It is determined that the essence of the new world order is to build a single, interconnected and global world, the renunciation of the supremacy of nation-states and the priority of universal interests. It is substantiated that in order to solve the problems of democratization in the new world order, it is necessary to implement the following principles: it is the inevitable orientation of Western democracies to their own fundamental values: freedom, human rights, tolerance, democracy, rule of law and social market economy; it is the recognition of the need for and respect for an international order based on common values, law, harmony, cooperation and participation in governance, the possibility of political, economic, social and cultural involvement in the construction of a globalized world; it is political determination and military ability to repel new threats. Both of these components are necessary for the reliable destruction of totalitarian networks and anti-humanist ideologies.It is noted that the spread of democratic institutions within the country was often accompanied by the collapse of democracy and the dominance of large powers at the interstate level, where the most important decisions had to be made on the world economy, proliferation and environmental protection. Liberal democracy, because it is the opposite of social democracy, is not responsible for meeting the needs of the most vulnerable societies. Adhering to the concept of world order and other normative-critical views, it can be noted that there is a possibility of devolution of the democratic mechanism of decision-making both at the regional, international level and at the level of self-government. The process of democratization is one of the elements in the effective construction of a new world order.Key words: democracy, democratization, new world order, international order, globalization, geopolitics.

Sociology Reference Guide: The Formation of Cultures -- Contents -- Introduction -- Cultural Universals & -- Human Nature -- Biology & -- Culture -- Culture: Sociobiology -- Cultural Relativism -- Culture & -- Language -- Cultural Scripts -- Cultural Symbols -- Cultural Transmission -- Ideal & -- Real Culture -- Culture: Values, Norms & -- Material Objects -- Culture & -- Conformity -- Popular Culture -- Subcultures & -- Countercultures -- Society & -- Multiculturalism -- Ethnocentrism -- Global Culture.

Using data on Government of Canada securities auctions, this paper shows that in countries where direct access to primary issuance is restricted to government securities dealers, Order-flow" information is a key source of private information for these security dealers. Order-flow information is revealed to a security dealer through his interactions with customers, who can place bids in the auctions only through the security dealer. Since each dealer interacts with a different set of customers, they, in effect, see different portions of the market demand and supply curves, leading to differing private inferences of where the equilibrium price might.

The development of the Earth's and planets formation theory over 70 years is considered with a special focus on the history of development of this theory at the Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPE RAS) where this direction of research was founded by Otto Schmidt. The state of the art of the theory is outlined. In particular, the planetesimals formation problem currently belonging to the key unsolved issues in the theory of planet formation is discussed. Recent results of the studies aimed at solving this problem at IPE RAS are presented.