"Extrait de la Revue économique internationale (septembre 1920)" ; Cover-title ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Author's autographed presentation copy to M. Pillet
English This article reports on a small-scale enquiry into the value for Japanese social work students of learning about international social work. The study highlights a number of practice-related benefits for students, linking these to contemporary Japanese and UK social work education and practice. French Cet article présente le rapport d'une enquête à échelle restreinte sur les valeurs des étudiants Japonais en travail social qui étudient le travail social international. L'étude souligne nombre d'avantages relatifs à la pratique pour les étudiants, en lien avec la formation et les pratiques de travail social contemporaines japonaises et britanniques. Spanish Este es el reporte de una investigación a pequeña escala sobre el valor que para los estudiantes japoneses de trabajo social tiene el aprender acerca del trabajo social internacional. El estudio subraya primero un número de beneficios relacionados con la práctica que alcanzarán los estudiantes, y después muestra la conexión que existe entre tales beneficios a la práctica y educación del trabajo social contemporáneos en el Japón y en el Reino Unido.
The book is written for active learners - those keen on cutting their own path through the complex and at times hardly comprehensible world of THEORY in International Relations. To aid this process as much as possible, this book employs the didactical and methodical concept of integrating teaching and self-study. The criteria for structured learning about IR theory will be derived from an extensive discussion of the questions and problems of philosophy of science (Part 1). Theory of IR refers to the scientific study of IR and covers all of the following subtopics: the role and status of theory in the academic discipline of IR; the understanding of IR as a science and what a "scientific" theory is; the different assumptions upon which theory building in IR is based; the different types of theoretical constructions and models of explanations found at the heart of particular theories.
Intro -- Collective Preventive Diplomacy -- Contents -- Tables and Illustrations -- Acknowledgments -- Part I: Framework and Concepts -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Insulation and Intervention: A Conceptual Overview -- 3. Forging Great-Power Consensus -- Part II: The History -- 4. Eight Cases -- Part III: Case Analysis -- 5. Local Ethnic Conflict as an International Problem -- 6. Great-Power Objectives and Agenda Making -- 7. Conciliating the Antagonists -- 8. From Conciliation to Coercion -- 9. The Endgame -- Part IV: Conclusions -- 10. Implications for Policy -- Notes -- CHAPTER 1 -- CHAPTER 2 -- CHAPTER 3 -- CHAPTER 4 -- CHAPTER 5 -- CHAPTER 6 -- CHAPTER 7 -- CHAPTER 8 -- CHAPTER 9 -- CHAPTER 10 -- Selected Bibliography -- List of Titles in the SUNY series in Global Politics -- Index -- A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- Z.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
The aim of the paper is the analysis of the relationship between the perception of the success factors in international collaborative relationships and firm's international experience. The results of an empirical study on the sample of 278 Polish exporters and importers cooperating with partners from China and Germany are presented and both the differences in success factor perception depending on foreign partners' home country, and the correlation of the perception of the success factors with the international experience of the firms are discussed. The study revealed that the firms working with partners in China have somewhat more international experience. The importance of the majority of the success factors in relationships with German partners did not differ significantly from those in collaboration with Chinese firms. However, some consequential differences were observed. Internationalization experience is not strongly related with the perception of international cooperation success factors.
With focus on three distinct international systems -- the interwar, the postwar or Cold war, & the emerging post-Cold war period -- examined is the impact of changing system structure (bipolarity, multipolarity), the degree of ideological conflict at the big-power level, alliance patterns, & rates of military technological change on such aspects of the arms trade as supplier markets, patterns of supplier-recipient relations, transfer modes, & levels of arms dependency by recipients. The emerging post-Cold war period already appears to evidence some trends in arms transfer patterns reminiscent of the interwar period, specifically those involving the depoliticization & denationalization of that trade. The impact of the military-technical revolution in an era of contracting global arms transfers is viewed as crucial to the emerging arms trade. Adapted from the source document.
AbstractInternational academic mobility is an important dimension of the internationalization of higher education institutions, which aims to enact practical changes in economies and societies. Although many studies have investigated the mobility of international students, the mobility of international academics has been less investigated, particularly in the context of mainland China. This qualitative study explores the experience of international academics in Chinese academia. The study is based on semi‐structured interviews with twenty‐six international academics from different countries, working at different universities in Beijing. Through a four‐stage systematic analysis, the study shows that international academics' engagement with mobility in Chinese academia can be characterized by a combination of gains and losses. This article explores how international academics view Chinese academia as either resourceful or restrictive for their academic career. It then discusses the hidden narratives concerning the challenges that international academics face in relation to mobility.
Die Frage nach den Ursachen von Krieg und Frieden und nach den Möglichkeiten des Friedens hat die Disziplin "Internationale Beziehungen" von Anfang an geprägt. Das Verhältnis von Recht und Macht kann als Schlüsselfrage der Friedensproblematik gelten. Auf die Frage, wie Frieden möglich ist, hat die Disziplin unterschiedliche Antworten gefunden. Der Verfasser stellt die Friedenskonzeptionen des Neorealismus, des Institutionalismus, des Konstruktivismus und des Liberalismus unter der Perspektive vor, welchen Beitrag sie zum Wissen um den Frieden leisten. Da Heterogenität als Komplementärentwicklung der Globalisierung die Weltordnung noch lange Zeit prägen wird, diskutiert er abschließend, in wie weit die einzelnen Ansätze das Moment der Heterogenität in ihre Friedenstheorie einbeziehen. (ICE2)