"Q-Code": Decision of the Supreme Court of ROC, Taiwan 20 July 2022 – Case No. 111-Year-Tai-App-Zih-No. 186
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 5, S. 773-777
ISSN: 2195-0237
2098447 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 5, S. 773-777
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 7, S. 1013-1043
ISSN: 2195-0237
AbstractAI systems are nowadays employed in ever-increasing areas. This new era of technological development is exciting, but AI applications are also a cause for concern. If tasks that have hitherto normally been undertaken by human beings are now to be taken care of by ever more intelligent autonomous systems, how can we be certain that such functions are performed diligently and safely? Many areas of application of AI systems have also made the tribulations of AI utilization apparent. The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) aims to tackle the concerns and challenges related to the utilization of AI, and to develop human-centric, secure, trustworthy, and ethical AI systems for the EU markets. The provisions of the AIA establish a system of compliance assessment that requires AI providers to disclose how high-risk AI systems have been trained and put together. This article will look at the role of disclosure obligations under the provisions of the AIA. The focus is on the tension between obligations to disclose information on the one hand and requirements to protect the trade secrets contained in the technical details of AI on the other. This article will explain how the technical details of AI contain some information that does not qualify for trade secret protection. And even when there are trade secrets, there are exceptions to trade secret protection. Rules to enable access to information form part of the Trade Secrets Directive, but other legislative instruments too enable access and make it necessary to navigate between access and confidentiality.
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 7, S. 1116-1120
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 5, S. 673-709
ISSN: 2195-0237
AbstractWith the access-to-medicines conundrum facing its populations, the East African Community has adopted a policy framework which promotes a collective approach to resolving the access gap in the region. To this end, crucial policy documents on the implementation of TRIPS obligations, harmonisation of drug regulation and boosting regional manufacturing capacity have been adopted. This paper is a case study of the regional policy on the implementation of TRIPS obligations, specifically examining the extent to which partner states' implementation of TRIPS obligations mirrors the regional recommendations. The paper finds that, while many partner states follow the regional recommendations on implementing TRIPS obligations, coherence remains a big challenge. This, the paper concludes, may affect the overall usefulness of a regional approach to solving the access conundrum.
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 5, S. 764-772
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 5, S. 798-805
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 7, S. 1157-1157
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 5, S. 778-786
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 5, S. 815-819
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 5, S. 797-797
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 8, S. 1310-1310
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 4, S. 573-584
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 4, S. 491-494
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 4, S. 608-611
ISSN: 2195-0237
In: International review of intellectual property and competition law: IIC, Band 54, Heft 8, S. 1244-1260
ISSN: 2195-0237