"La Commission européenne et les professionnels du cinéma s'affrontent sur trois sujets : le programme Europe Créative, la video on demand et la taxe sur les fournisseurs d'accès à Internet".
The article focuses on the Next Generation EU as a financial intervention plan prepared by the European Union to tackle the health, economic and social crisis caused by the Covid-19 epidemic. The programs that make up the Next Generation Eu are analyzed, and therefore also the specific aspect of its insertion into the sequence of the European Semester, in the belief that this constitutes an important turning point for the Union, both for the role played by the European Commission in determining the objectives and contents of the policies of the Member States in relation to the Semester, and for the effective expansion and reorientation of the EU guidelines in the view to recovery and resilience. In order to highlight the change in the "political discourse" of the European Commission and therefore of the Union in general, the Annual Growth Surveys for 2017, 2018 and 2019 and the Annual Growth Strategy 2020, drawn up by European Commission at the beginning of the European Semester for the years considered and, for the same purpose, the Country-specific Recommendations addressed to Italy, France, Spain and Germany, for the years 2019 and 2020, were examined. Another topic that it was intended to give rise to from this analysis, is that concerning the notion of a s.c. "useful conditionality", which would emerge from the methods applied by the European Commission in carrying out its monitoring function on the policies adopted by the Member States in connection with the disbursement of loans and grants referred to in the resilience and resilience device. In this context, the issues concerning the proposal to modify the EU's own resources and the proposal on the remodeling of the Union's multiannual financial framework were also brought to attention.
The External Policy of the European Commission and the Challenges of Globalisation. The European Union's external activities are growing ever more pronounced. Global exchanges, common foreign and security policy, aid to developing countries, and the birth of the Euro are all areas in which there is a need for co-ordinated effort. The external administration of the Commission is trying to adapt to these new requirements. Moreover, the cumulated resources of each Member State are making the European Union the most represented entity at international level, particularly in the area of diplomacy. These huge resources can be utilised more effectively through collaboration between the external administrations of Member States and between these administrations and the Commission.
As the latest financial and economic crisis has reshuffled the institutional order on the economic governance of the European Union, the role of the European Commission stands to question, While it is often portrayed as being in general decline, this article provides a more nuanced perspective. The Commission's agenda setting power is indeed decreasing due to growing leadership by the European Council but a large majority of decisions in economic governance are dependent on the European Union's executive to make them work. With more and stronger implementation competences it may therefore be less visible but it is hardly less important. Adapted from the source document.
This article analyses the New Pact on migration and asylum in light of the evolution of European law and the trends which characterize its develop- ment. In the aftermath of the partial failure of the reform advanced in 2016, the new European Commission's proposals are placed in a context of recurrent crises, typical of the process of integration of the European Union. What emerges is a reform in which the protection of human rights coexists together with pragmatic solutions as well as flexible solidarity mechanisms put for- ward to curb irregular immigration. If it appears an urgency to incorporate the newly developed emergency measures into the EU legal framework, the Union is confronted with Member States' domestic policies and the need for a more effective coordination. ; Questo contributo analizza il Nuovo Patto sulla migrazione e l'asilo alla luce delle evoluzioni del diritto europeo e di alcune macro-tendenze che ne ca- ratterizzano lo sviluppo. L'odierna proposta di riforma della Commissione europea interviene in un contesto di cicliche crisi, tipico dell'integrazione eu- ropea, all'indomani del parziale fallimento di quella presentata nel 2016. Ne emerge una riforma in cui la tutela dei diritti umani dei migranti è posta in relazione alle soluzioni pragmatiche di contrasto all'immigrazione irregolare e di ricerca di meccanismi di solidarietà flessibili. L'esigenza di inglobare le misure emergenziali emerse nel corso degli ultimi anni nel quadro giuridico dell'Unione si confronta, infatti, con le politiche interne degli Stati membri e la necessità di un più efficace coordinamento delle stesse.
This article analyses the New Pact on migration and asylum in light of the evolution of European law and the trends which characterize its develop- ment. In the aftermath of the partial failure of the reform advanced in 2016, the new European Commission's proposals are placed in a context of recurrent crises, typical of the process of integration of the European Union. What emerges is a reform in which the protection of human rights coexists together with pragmatic solutions as well as flexible solidarity mechanisms put for- ward to curb irregular immigration. If it appears an urgency to incorporate the newly developed emergency measures into the EU legal framework, the Union is confronted with Member States' domestic policies and the need for a more effective coordination. ; Questo contributo analizza il Nuovo Patto sulla migrazione e l'asilo alla luce delle evoluzioni del diritto europeo e di alcune macro-tendenze che ne ca- ratterizzano lo sviluppo. L'odierna proposta di riforma della Commissione europea interviene in un contesto di cicliche crisi, tipico dell'integrazione eu- ropea, all'indomani del parziale fallimento di quella presentata nel 2016. Ne emerge una riforma in cui la tutela dei diritti umani dei migranti è posta in relazione alle soluzioni pragmatiche di contrasto all'immigrazione irregolare e di ricerca di meccanismi di solidarietà flessibili. L'esigenza di inglobare le misure emergenziali emerse nel corso degli ultimi anni nel quadro giuridico dell'Unione si confronta, infatti, con le politiche interne degli Stati membri e la necessità di un più efficace coordinamento delle stesse.