Suchergebnisse

Секция 2. Методологический потенциал современной философии ; Рассматривается взаимосвязь философии и социально-гуманитарных наук в двух основных аспектах. Диахронических аспект характеризует особенности становления и развития наук об обществе и статусе человека в нем, начиная с XVII века. Характеризуется специфика и проблемное поле четырех основных этапов в развитии обществознания – классический этап, этап институционализации социально-гуманитарных наук, этапы неклассического и современного постнеклассического обществознания. Синхронический (функциональный) аспект анализа темы предполагает экспликацию взаимодействия философии и социальных наук на основе существования у них взаимного прагматического интереса. Он осуществляется в трех ракурсах, Во-первых, существования исследовательских программ в обществознании, во-вторых, существования междисциплинарных систем знания об обществе – политической, экономической и др. философии, в-третьих, координации тематических разделов в программах и практике преподавания этих дисциплин. ; The article discusses correlation between philosophy and social science in two principal aspects. Diachronic aspect characterizes the special features in evolution of the branch of sciences studying society and human from XVII century. The specificity and problematic area of four main stages in history of social science is characterized (including classic stage, stage of social science institutionalization, stages of non-classic and post-non-classic social science). Synchronic (functional) aspect explicates the cooperation between philosophy and social science because of mutual pragmatic interest. It reveals in three ways: in research programs in social science; in cross-disciplinary systems of social knowledge such as political, economic philosophy, etc.; in coordination of thematic parts in programmes and practice of teaching of these courses.

The concept of scientific infrastructure in the interpretation adopted in the European Union is considered. It is indicated that this is a modern form of organization of scientific information services. The structure of European organizations and projects forming the scientific infrastructure of European organizations is described. The activities of European consortia of scientific infrastructure of social and humanitarian profile, including information resources and services implemented in these consortia, are described in particular detail. It is concluded that the European experience can be very useful for the development of scientific information services in Russia. ; Рассматривается понятие научной инфраструктуры в трактовке, принятой в Евросоюзе. Указывается, что это является современной формой организации служб научной информации. Описывается структура европейских организаций и проектов, образующих научную инфраструктуру европейских организаций. Подробно описывается деятельность европейских консорциумов научной инфраструктуры социального и гуманитарного профиля, в том числе, информационных ресурсов и сервисов, реализованных в этих консорциумах. Делается вывод, что европейский опыт может быть очень полезен для развития служб научной информации в России.

The article analyzes the definitions of the public as a subject of social sciences. The purpose of the paper is to operationalize the concept of the public for its practical application in the system of functioning of political institutions. The basis of the methodology is an instrumental approach. The methods used are comparative, legal analysis, description and generalization of data, a questionnaire survey of residents of a metropolitan Russian city to assess the potential of public activity in solving local issues. Various theories of domestic and foreign researchers focus their attention on particular aspects of the public. Representatives of the managerial approach formally divide the public into several groups: public organized structures (NGOs, professional community, etc.), acting on a permanent and legal basis, and active citizens acting situationally within a specific project to discuss it (interested citizens, expert councils, etc.). Within the framework of political theory, the public always focuses on a problem and forms through getting interested in a particular challenge. From the point of view of the law, the public is not designated as a concept but indirectly finds its expression in the legally established forms of realization of the right to local selfgovernment. In PR, the public is labile, dynamic and unstable to manipulation. The key characteristics of the concept under consideration, which is widely used in the Russian and foreign communication space, but not formed into a single definition, are highlighted. The author concludes that the public is heterogenic, dualistic, centred on a particular problem. The empirical study revealed a low level of public participation in projects associated with creating a comfortable urban environment. On the contrary, the level of willingness to get involved in other city problems is high. ; В статье проведен анализ определений общественности как предмета социальных наук. Цель статьи — операционализация понятия «общественность» для его практического применения в системе функционирования политических институтов. Основа методологии — инструментальный подход. В качестве методов применены сравнительный, правовой анализ, описание и обобщение данных, анкетный опрос жителей крупного российского города на предмет оценки потенциала общественной активности в решении вопросов местного значения. Различные теории отечественных и зарубежных исследователей фокусируют свое внимание на тех или иных аспектах общественности. Представители управленческого подхода формально разделяют общественность на несколько групп — организованные структуры общественности (НКО, профессиональное сообщество и др.), действующие на постоянной и юридической основе, и активных граждан, действующих ситуативно в рамках определенного проекта в целях его обсуждения (заинтересованные граждане, экспертные советы и т. д.). В рамках политической теории общественность всегда сосредоточена вокруг проблемы, и формируется она посредством возникновения интереса к определенной проблеме. С точки зрения права общественность как понятие не обозначается, но косвенно находит свое выражение в законодательно установленных формах реализации права на местное самоуправление. В PR общественность является лабильной, динамичной и неустойчивой к манипуляциям. Выделены ключевые характеристики рассматриваемого понятия, широко используемого в российском и зарубежном коммуникационном пространстве, но не оформленном в единое определение. Автор делает вывод о неоднородности, дуалистичности общественности, сосредоточенной вокруг определенной проблемы. В рамках эмпирического исследования выявлен низкий уровень общественного участия в проектах формирования комфортной городской среды при высоком уровне готовности включиться в решение других проблем города.

This article attempts to reveal the contents of a relatively young concept of "scientiic diplomacy", which includes three dimensions (science in diplomacy, diplomacy for science, science for diplomacy), as well as to identify key practices of all three dimensions of science diplomacy. The author identiies key practices that illustrate the three dimensions of science diplomacy: development of recommendations to the international policy objectives (science in diplomacy); simpliication of the process of international scientiic cooperation (diplomacy for science); the use of scientiic alliances in order to improve international relations between countries (science for diplomacy). The author carries out a systematic analysis and gives a generalized description of their efectiveness and eiciency. The article analyzes the experience of the international cooperation of scientists through personal initiative and under the auspices of the National Science Foundation and other associations, such as the AAAS, GIS or LIGO. They have become a platform for studying the practices of the irst and second dimensions of science diplomacy – "science in diplomacy" and "diplomacy for science." Particular attention is paid to the Russell-Einstein Manifesto, which initiated the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Afairs, and, accordingly, the development of such a dimension as a "science for diplomacy". Date of scientists who are in the movement, make a signiicant contribution to the development of international scientiic cooperation and create conditions to improve the political climate. The author proposes as a landmark example of the third dimension of science diplomacy consider the Union of Concerned Scientists – Union of Concerned Scientists, which was founded in 1969 by faculty and students at MIT. Also, special attention is paid to the periodization of the development of science diplomacy, as the author concludes that it was after World War II, when scientists themselves have become actively involved in the resolution of ...

Issues of research methodology have always been important for social sciences. In the contemporary world, globalizational challenges and economic crises both change the society dramatically and reveal the weakness of the explanatory capability of many conventional theories. Thus examining the theoretical and methodological foundations of contemporary social science proves a highly important challenge.In our opinion, substantiated in the article, many underlying reasons for the contemporary systemic crisis have arisen because many fundamental concepts in social sciences fail to adequately reflect the changing reality, including the crises in global economy, politics and interethnic relations. Social sciences often can neither predict these processes nor explain their causes and nature.We contend that the weakness of the explanatory capability of social science is due to its being founded on the Newtonian-Cartesian metaparadigm, which, in its turn, rests upon the laws of the macrocosm — while the contemporary world has actually become akin to a microcosm.We conclude that the existing categorical apparatus needs reviewing and refining, which will consequently lead to a development of a new metaparadigm of thinking. ; Для общественной науки проблемы методологии всегда представляют чрезвычайно важную задачу. Особенно эта значимость возрастает в современном мире, когда глобализационные вызовы и экономические кризисы не только кардинально меняют общество, но и наглядно демонстрируют слабость объяснительного потенциала многих традиционных теорий. Отсюда чрезвычайно важным представляется анализ теоретико-методологической базы современной общественной науки.В статье обосновывается мысль о том, что причины современного системного кризиса объясняются тем, что многие фундаментальные понятия общественной науки не совсем адекватно отражают изменившуюся реальность, в частности кризисные процессы и явления в области мировой экономики, политики, межэтнических отношений. Общественные науки часто не способны не только предсказать, но и объяснить причины и сущность этих процессов.Согласно мнению автора слабость объяснительного потенциала общественной науки состоит в том, что она до сих пор основывается на ньютоно-картезианской метапарадигме, которая, в свою очередь, базируется на законах макромира, в то время как современный мир стал фактически похожим на микромир.Отсюда необходимы пересмотр и уточнение существующего категориального аппарата и, соответственно, поиск и разработка новой метапарадигмы мышления.

Journal "Comparative Politics" in Web of Science. ; Журнал «Сравнительная политика» в Web of Science.

This article provides an overview of the main Internet-sites for scientiic vacancies. The scientiic labor market is analyzed on the basis of data from the internet portal "ученые-исследователи.рф". It is revealed that the distribution of vacancies on the portal in diferent areas of science is uneven, most of the vacancies posted on the site are SMET vacancies (Science, Math, Engineering and Technology), there are much fewer vacancies for scientists of the humanitarian proile. The geographical distribution of vacancies is also uneven (with Moscow and Moscow region leading by a large margin). The absolute majority of employers' organizations registered on the portal are government agencies, mostly organizations subordinate to FANO. Average salaries are extremely low, lower than average income by region. Abroad, journals like Science and Nature both have big Internetsites for scientiic vacancies. Placement of announcements about scientiic vacancies on these sites is a paid service. Science is more focused on the American market, while Nature is more international. In any case, both sites have a more extensive geographical coverage in comparison with the site "ученые-исследователи.рф". Moreover, a signiicant part of employers on these sites are private universities commercial enterprises. The average salary for vacancies posted on these sites is much higher than for vacancies on the site "ученые-исследователи.рф". It is concluded that if the government of the Russian Federation wants to use the internet portal "ученые-исследователи.рф" as a tool to boost academic mobility in Russia, increase in salary in Russian universities and institutes is necessary, as well as a real representation of these salaries in job descriptions on the website. ; For citation: Malahov VA. The science labor market in Russia and abroad (based on the largest science job portals). Science. Innovation. Education. 2018;4(30): 120–132.

The phenomenon of exceptional (to the extent of chaos) conceptual and terminological diversity is currently observed in the research of S&T development and in the practice of public administration of science and technology in the Russian Federation. It has the most strong and negative impact at the federal level as it appears in the strategic planning documents, which sum up and put into action the governmental science and technology policy (in terms of goal setting, forecasting, planning and programming the socio-economic development and national security). The article seeks to comprehend and explain the root cause of this conceptual and terminological diversity, that lie, in the author's opinion, in the excessive decentralization and weak public administration of the S&T development in the country. In the face of new global challenges and threats the leading role of the state in S&T development should be drastically increased. The article outlines juridical principles of the Russian S&T modernization at the current stage of development.

If the beginning of the 21st century, with its rapid changes, somewhat led into deep confusion of the world in general and the country in particular, then the arisen is unknown from where Covid 19 and the so-called digitalization are already testing the strength of the human community once again and even more with tough manifestations. Target attitudes, formed over decades, are shifted in the criteria. Living preferences, built priorities, prevailing moral but ethical standards. Of course, the forms of social consciousness, among which economic science, if you use a generalizing term is crucial. And the history of countries with their various characteristics confirms this, as well as the fact that science itself is not represented is a set of dogmas or once and for all frozen truths. Economic science, reflecting, to one degree or another, the cyclically developing economic world, also changes its object, subject, methodological approaches, tools analysis.

Раскрываются этапы становления и развития социальной коммуникации как отрасли научного знания и образовательной специальности. Представлены различные концептуально-структурные модели социальной коммуникации, описывающие ее компоненты и связи между ними. Выявляется специфика рациональной коммуникации в экономике, политике, бизнесе, науке. Показывается, что на современном этапе появляются реальные предпосылки для формирования фундаментальной теоретической и практико-ориентированной концепции социальной коммуникации, выделения данной области исследования и ее дисциплинарного поля в качестве автономной, самодостаточной академической единицы. = Disclosed are stages in the development of social communication as a branch of scientific knowledge and educational specialty. It presents various conceptual and structural model of social communication, describing its components and connections between them. It reveals the specifics of rational communication in economy, politics, business and science. It is shown that at present there are real prerequisites for the formation of fundamental theoretical and practice-oriented concept of social communication, selection of the research and its disciplinary field as an autonomous, self-contained academic units

The paper discusses the prospects for connecting the universities to use Mega- Science research facilities as an important tool for the integration of world level science and education. The need for such integration of leading universities with research organizations was noted in the RF Government Decision of 19 June 2015 on the results of the joint meeting of the boards of trustees of the Southern and Siberian Federal University. ; Описаны перспективы подключения вузов к использованию научно-исследовательских установок мега-класса, которые являются важнейшим инструментом интеграции науки и образования мирового уровня. Необходимость подобной интеграции ведущих университетов с научными организациями была отмечена в решении Правительства Российской Федерации 19 июня 2015 г. по итогам совместного заседания попечительских советов Южного и Сибирского федеральных университетов.

Scientiic collaboration continues to increase in frequency and importance. It has the potential to solve complex scientiic problems. The relevance of the research is caused by the role of scientiic collaboration in scientiic and technological sphere. Scientiic collaboration can be deined as a science infrastructure and as a process of intellectual cooperation. The aim of the research is to construct the model of scientiic collaboration in Russian science and technology. This has been gained by solving the following research objectives: deinition of the term «scientiic collaboration», types of collaborations consideration, analysis of intellectual and research infrastructure cooperation methods which take place in Russian scientiic organizations. The main feature of this research is the particular methodology which is based on scientometrics, comparative analysis and scientiic modeling. Scientometrics was used for deining productive scientiic collaboration in Russia. Open sources of information about international and Russian scientiic collaboration, oficial websites of Russian Ministry of Education and Science and Russian Academy of Science, such databases as Russian Statistics Committee and Web of Science can be mentioned as main information resources of the research. Main results of theoretical and practical part of the research are the original authors` vision of the base of scientiic collaborations in formation Russia which meansan effective cooperation of three components: intellectual resources (scientists and research teams), infrastructure (which can provide scientists with regular access to research equipment) and government (as a main regulator). Moreover, it should be mentioned that the main productive development option for Russian scientiic collaboration is territory integration of intellectual resources and research infrastructure.

The scientiic and technological (S&T) development of the Russian Federation is one of the government top priorities. In the context of globalization, a clear image of the country's global S&T ranking can be helpful for decision making in science policy. The paper analyzes the main international statistical data banks which allow for cross-country comparisons of S&T capabilities and reviews various international rankings, including special innovation indices and rankings based on science and technology indicators, which provide opportunity to locate position of Russia in the global S&T and innovation landscape. The study is based on data from the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), UNESCO, international rankings relecting the countries' readiness for a knowledge-based economy: the Global Innovation Index, the Bloomberg Innovation Index, The IMD World Competitiveness, The Global Talent Competitiveness Index, the Networked Readiness Index. The article focuses on analysis of Russia's positions in international science, technology and innovation rankings. The discussion ends with the conclusion that despite rather high R&D expenditures and quality of human capital, R&D efectiveness and impact of S&T on the Russian economy are estimated as rather low.

The paper studies the mobilization of non-military science, suffering of internal crisis. The aims of such a mobilization are: to perform a complex of vital scientiic and technical tasks set within the military-industrial complex, to enable import substitution in the non-military sectors, due to the external economic sanctions, and to develop perspective research directions. It is shown, with some examples of the decision-making low speed within the science infrastructure development and dealing with talented youth, that the current R&D regulators' passiveness is unacceptable under new conditions. The analysis of the President of Russia May decrees and a series of his instructions revealed the soft model of the science mobilization, which, in case of its failure, will be replaced by a hard scenario. The necessary conditions for the non-military science hard mobilization start are deined, including the centralization of inancial resources, a moratorium on the multiplicity of research funding sources and the traditional R&D contest. The formation of an "emergency" state authority is contemplated in purpose of the non-military science mobilization and achieving the goals of the mobilization period. The mobilization format of the state task for universities is proposed, as an instrument of University science mobilization.

The article is devoted to the ways in which the notion of resilience is debated in social sciences and humanities in Russia and abroad. The experience of co-organizing the conference "Junctures of Modernity: Individual and Social Resilience" (ISPN, UrFU, 25-26 March 2016) is taken into consideration. It is argued that the energetic appropriation of the notions of individual, collective and social resilience by the theories of crisis management, urban studies, sociology, and social psychology testifies to the usefulness of this notion for describing how countries, nations, military and other communities exist today. The notion of "scales of resilience" is introduced to systematize the on-going debate.Key words: resilience, concept of resilience, urban studies, crisis management, social science ; В статье рассматривается обсуждение жизнестойкости в российском и зарубежном социально-гуманитарном знании с учетом опыта организации международной междисциплинарной конференции «Стыки модерности: жизнестойкость личности и сообществ», проведенной ИСПН УрФУ 25–26 марта 2016 г. Энергичное использование понятий индивидуальной, коллективной и социальной жизнестойкости в зарубежных теориях кризисного менеджмента, урбанистике, социологии, социальной психологии свидетельствует, что понятие обнаруживает свою нужность для описания жизни стран, наций, военных, этнических и иных сообществ. Введено понятие «шкал жизнестойкости» для систематизации имеющихся позиций.Ключевые слова: жизнестойкость, шкалы, модерность, постмодерность, катастрофы, кризис, менеджмент.