Suchergebnisse

AbstractThe birth of the Constitutional Court Verdict No.16 / PUU-XVI / 2018 has implications for the authority of the Council of Honors (MKD) of the House Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia (DPR-RI) which was previously regulated in Article 2 of Act Number 2 of 2018 concerning the Second Amendment to Act Number 17 of 2018 concerning the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR), House of Representatives (DPR-RI), Regional Representative Council (DPRD), and Regional House of Representatives (DPD) (UU MD3). The problem in this study is First, how is the position of the right to immunity of members of the house of representatives in the perspective of equality before the law?. Second, how is the implication of the Constitutional Court No.16/PUU-XVI/2018 releated to the MKD (Council Honorary Court)?. This research is a normative study using a legislative approach, a historical apporach, and a case approach. The results of the study show that right of immunity of the DPR members not contradicting the principle of equality before the law as long as the meaning of the right of immunity does not cover the total immunity of the members of the DPR as citizens in general. In addition, the right of immunity only relates to the functions and authority and duties of the DPR. The verdict of the Constitutional Court No.16/PUU-XVI/2018 has implications on two things, the abolition of MKD authority in giving preliminary considerations before the Presidents written permission is born, as well as an agreement to call and request information from DPR Members in relations to criminal acts only through the Presidents permission.Keywords: House of Representatives, Constitutional Court, Equality Before The Law, RightOf Immunity.

In addition to the professionalism element, the portion of certain ministries for the party supporting the presidential candidate will influence the presentation of women's representation as ministers in the government cabinet. This article aims to describe the problematic placement of women as ministers in Indonesia and the effective percentage of representation of women as ministers in a government cabinet. The analysis will be carried out normatively using a statutory, historical, and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that until now, women's representation had been accommodated in every government cabinets. However, there is no fixed number of women as ministers. Women tend to occupy ministries that dealt with nature and social life. Therefore, it can be done a special action (affirmative action) in the form of determining the minimum limit of the number of women's representation in a government cabinet. In addition, the determination of the composition of the government cabinet is also based on the zaken cabinet. Selain unsur profesionalitas, porsi kementerian tertentu bagi partai pengusung calon Presiden akan mempengaruhi presentasi keterwakilan perempuan sebagai menteri dalam kabinet pemerintahan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan problematika penempatan perempuan sebagai menteri di Indonesia dan presentase efektif keterwakilan perempuan sebagai menteri dalam suatu kabinet pemerintahan. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisa secara normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, sejarah serta konseptual. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa hingga saat ini, keterwakilan perempuan telah diakomodir dalam setiap kabinet pemerintahan. Akan tetapi, tidak ada jumlah yang tetap terhadap presentase perempuan sebagai menteri. Perempuan cenderung menempati kementerian yang berhubungan dengan kodrat dan kehidupan sosialnya. Oleh sebab itu, dapat dilakukan suatu tindakan khusus (affirmative action) berupa penentuan batas minimal jumlah keterwakilan perempuan dalam suatu kabinet pemerintahan. Selain itu, penentuan komposisi kabinet pemerintahan juga harus didasarkan pada kabinet zaken.