Suchergebnisse

Seit den demokratischen Revolutionen von 1989 hat sich sowohl in der Regierung als auch in der Gesellschaft der USA das Interesse an der internationalen Förderung von Demokratie und Pluralismus verstärkt. Entgegen verbreiteter wissenschaftlicher Ansicht kommen die Autoren zu dem Ergebnis, daß die USA tatsächlich in der Lage sind, demokratische Entwicklungen international zu fördern, bzw. daß sie nachweisbar solche Entwickungen bereits gefördert haben. Im einzelnen werden Prinzipien für demokratiefördernde Initiativen aufgezählt und in Verbindung mit konkreten Maßnahmen erörtert.(AuD-Hng)

Views of the American Christian community on the morality of the "Gulf War."

One of the most important functions governments perform is that of mobilizing and deploying financial resources to achieve their objectives. According to the most recent World Bank data, governments throughout the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region spent approximately 407 billion dollars in 2007 in delivering their policy, regulatory and service functions. The way in which this money is spent has huge implications for their broader development trajectory. For governments to perform their spending function well, their PFM practices should meet certain well-established criteria. Government spending should be affordable, in that it takes place within a framework that ensures expenditure is consistent with monetary and fiscal policy objectives and sustainable in the long term. Governments should optimize the allocation of public resources between different sectors and expenditure categories in a way that reflects their policy priorities, including sustainable growth as well as human and social development. Such expenditure should be efficient, in that it maximizes output for a given set of inputs, and effective, in that it supports the successful realization of the government's goals. It should also be transparent; conducted in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations; and undertaken with appropriate checks and balances to ensure financial probity.

This volume—a collaborative work between the World Bank's Global Governance Practice and a team of researchers working with the Korean Development Institute—is dedicated to the proposition that there is much that can be learned from a careful and nuanced assessment of Korea's experience with e-governance. It seeks to draw lessons both from the large reservoir of experience as to what has worked, as well as the more limited and isolated examples of what has not. In particular, it seeks to achieve two objectives. The first is to accurately understand, capture and distill the key dimensions of Korea's e-governance experience so that it can be properly understood and appreciated. Towards this end, some of the world's leading experts on Korea's e-governance experience have been engaged in its preparation, and their conclusions have been carefully vetted and reviewed by other leading scholars of the role of IT systems within government. The goal is to avoid flip generalizations or characterizations, such as "political will is important" or "it is important to embed e-governance within a broader strategy to develop a domestic IT industry," but to truly understand the complex interplay between differing political, economic and bureaucratic interests and how they shaped decisions about developing the technological and human infrastructure that would support Korea's successful thrust to be the world's leading nation in this area. The second is to ponder the lessons learned and what did and did not work from Korea's experience for other developing countries seeking to strengthen the role of information technology within their public sectors.