Este artigo revisita a Escola Inglesa - da obra seminal de Hedley Bull em 1977, passando pelos esforços de Adam Watsom nos anos 80, e culminando com o repaginamento de Barry Buzan e Richard Little na década de 90 - resgatando sua ontologia histórica e esboçando um programa de pesquisa que a concilie com o da historiografia francesa. Conclui-se que pode ser detectado um sistema de causalidades múltiplas em nível sistêmico, com forças profundas materiais e psicosociais operando sob os auspícios do conceito de ordem, tão crucial a esta escola.
This paper revisits the English School from the seminal work of Hedley Bull in 1977, passing by the efforts of Adam Watsom in the 80's, & culminating with Barry Buzan & Richard Little repagination in the 90's. It aims to rescue the school's historical ontology & sketch a research program that conciliates it with the French historiography one. One concludes that a system of multiple causalities can be detected in a systemic level, with material & psycho-social deep forces operating under the auspices of the concept of order, so crucial to this school. References. Adapted from the source document.
Abstract This article analyses the performance of developing countries in WTO disputes against the USA and EU (the G2) from 1995 to 2012. It investigates the influence of four factors – WTO rules and norms, institutional-legal capacity, market power, and trade dynamics – on two samples, namely disputes initiated and successfully concluded against the G2. Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) are used to analyse the data. They show that, while relative bilateral exports also play a role, the institutional-legal capacity and market power of developing countries (as represented by GDP) play the most important role in allowing developing countries to initiate disputes against the G2, and to complete them successully.