Suchergebnisse
Filter
43 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Creating Human Nature: The Political Challenges of Genetic Engineering. By Benjamin Gregg. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022. 250p. $105.00 cloth, $34.99 paper
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 21, Heft 3, S. 1075-1077
ISSN: 1541-0986
Your Whole Life: Beyond Childhood and Adulthood. By James Bernard Murphy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2020. 253p. $59.95 cloth
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 19, Heft 2, S. 622-623
ISSN: 1541-0986
How should wetheorizeabout justice in the genomic era?
In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 106-125
ISSN: 1471-5457
AbstractThe sequencing of the human genome and advances in gene therapy and genomic editing, coupled with embryo selection techniques and a potential gerontological intervention, are some examples of the rapid technological advances of the "genetic revolution." This article addresses the methodological issue of how we should theorize about justice in the genomic era. Invoking the methodology ofnon-ideal theory, I argue that theorizing about justice in the genomic era entails theorizing about (1) the new inequalities that the genetic revolution could exacerbate (e.g., genetic discrimination, disability-related injustices, and gender inequality),and(2) those inequalities that the genetic revolution could help us mitigate (e.g., the risks of disease in early and late life). By doing so, normative theorists can ensure that we develop an account of justice that takes seriously not only individual rights, equality of opportunity, the cultural and sociopolitical aspects of disability, and equality between the sexes, but also the potential health benefits (to both individuals and populations) of attending to the evolutionary causes of morbidity and disability.
Justice for Earthlings: Essays in Political Philosophy, David Miller, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 254
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique : RCSP, S. 15-17
ISSN: 0008-4239
Justice for Earthlings: Essays in Political Philosophy, David Miller, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 254
In: Canadian journal of political science: CJPS = Revue canadienne de science politique, Band 48, Heft 3, S. 735-737
ISSN: 1744-9324
Play and Politics
In: Journal of political science education, Band 9, Heft 4, S. 487-500
ISSN: 1551-2177
EMPIRICAL ETHICS AND THE DUTY TO EXTEND THE "BIOLOGICAL WARRANTY PERIOD"
In: Social philosophy & policy, Band 30, Heft 1-2, S. 480-503
ISSN: 1471-6437
AbstractThe world's aging populations face novel health challenges never experienced before in human history. The moral landscape thus needs to adapt to reflect this novel empirical reality. In this paper I take for granted one basic moral principle advanced by Peter Singer — a principle of preventing bad occurrences — and explore the implications that empirical considerations from demography, evolutionary biology, and biogerontology have for the way we conceive of fulfilling this principle at the operational level. After bringing to the fore a number of considerations that Singer ignores, such as the probability that nonintervention will result in harm and the likelihood that different kinds of extrinsic and intrinsic harms can be prevented, I argue that the aspiration to extend the human biological warranty period (by retarding the rate of aging) is a pressing moral imperative for the twenty-first century. In the final sections I briefly address some standard objections raised against life extension and conclude that, while there may be some legitimate concerns worth addressing, they are not compelling enough to provide a rational basis for forfeiting the potential health and economic benefits that could be realized by extending the biological warranty period.
Virtue Epistemology and the 'Epistemic Fitness' of Democracy
In: Political studies review, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 7-22
ISSN: 1478-9302
In this article I explore three distinct advantages of linking virtue epistemology to an epistemic defence of democracy. First, because intellectual agents and communities are the primary focus of epistemic evaluation, virtue epistemology offers political theorists the opportunity to develop an epistemic defence of democracy that takes 'realism' seriously (e.g. the cognitive limitations and biases of humans). Second, because virtue epistemology conceives of epistemology as a normative discipline, it builds normative criteria into the exercise of assessing the 'epistemic fitness' of a political arrangement (e.g. democracy vs. epistocracy). Third, by assessing the epistemic powers of democracy from a virtue-epistemological perspective, a more robust (Deweyan) conception of democracy needs to be employed and assessed than the minimalist conception employed by the Condorcet Jury Theorem.
Patriarchy and Historical Materialism
In: Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, Band 26, Heft 1, S. 1-21
ISSN: 1527-2001
Why does the world have the pattern of patriarchy it currently possesses? Why have patriarchal practices and institutions evolved and changed in the ways they have tended to over time in human societies? This paper explores these general questions by integrating a feminist analysis of patriarchy with the central insights of the functionalist interpretation of historical materialism advanced by G. A. Cohen. The paper has two central aspirations: first, to help narrow the divide between analytical Marxism and feminism by redressing the former's neglect of the important role female labor has played, and continues to play, in shaping human history. Second, by developing the functionalist account of historical materialism in order to take patriarchy seriously, we can derive useful insights for diagnosing the emancipatory challenges that women face in the world today. The degree and form of patriarchy present in any particular society is determined by the productive forces it has had at its disposal. According to historical materialism, technological, material, and medical advances that ease the pressures on high fertility rates (such as the sanitation revolution, vaccinations, birth control, and so on) are the real driving forces behind the positive modulations to patriarchy witnessed in the twentieth century.
Global Aging, Well-Ordered Science, and Prospection
Aristotle described the study of politics as an "architectonic" science that aspires to bring together insights from different fields of scientific inquiry to ensure that citizens have the opportunities to flourish. To meet the health and economic challenges of aging populations, we must revive this Aristotelian vision of politics. Prioritizing biogerontology is a requirement of well-ordered science. But a number of cognitive limitations and biases impair our ability to perceive both the harms of the inborn aging process and the magnitude of the likely benefits of age retardation. Thus, well-ordered science also requires us to address the social and cultural, and not merely scientific, obstacles that impede the aspiration to retard human aging.
BASE
"Mind the Gap": Beneficence and Senescence
In: Public affairs quarterly: PAQ, Band 24, Heft 2, S. 115-131
ISSN: 0887-0373