State and society in South Asia: themes of assertion and recognition
In: Heidelberg series in South Asian and comparative studies v. 7
90 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Heidelberg series in South Asian and comparative studies v. 7
In: Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
In: Standpunkte 2008,4
In: Schriftenreihe der Gesellschaft für Deutschlandforschung 43
In: Vorträge zur Militärgeschichte 5
In: (Vorträge zur Militärgeschichte, 4)
World Affairs Online
In: Wehrforschung aktuell 7
World Affairs Online
In: Spektrum der Mediation, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 18-21
ISSN: 2750-2481
Manipulation als eine Form der Beeinflussung hat einen schlechten Ruf. Auch im psychosozialen Bereich werden mitunter Anklagen von Manipulation laut. Manipulation kann, muss aber nicht problematisch sein. Philosoph und Therapeut Dr. Alexander Fischer analysiert, wie Manipulation konzeptualisiert werden kann, wie sie im psychosozialen Bereich aussehen mag, und wann sie problematisch wird.
This thesis is a longitudinal study of judicial power in India and captures the history of the Supreme Court from the perspective of positive political theory. Combining measurements of competitiveness of political participation with quantitative indicators that describe the court as a composite actor, the thesis identifies both the structuration of opportunities for judicial power expansion as well as critical junctures resulting from the court's strategic choices. Each chapter combines empirical data and historiographic narratives to portray such phases of institutional flux, re-conceptualizing the overall trend towards judicial power expansion as distinct sequences of judicial overreach, jurisdiction stripping, and judicial self-empowerment alternating between regime supportive judicial activism and judicial assertiveness. Like all good dependent variables the power of the Indian Supreme Court thus varies over time, while the theoretical frameworks for tying together this thesis always derive from the same paradigm of separation-of-power-games, drawing on strategic approaches in judicialization studies to explain juristocratic patterns of judicial power expansion in India.
BASE
In: suhrkamp taschenbuch wissenschaft 2228
In: Suhrkamp-E-Books
In: Philosophie
This article explores the constitutional ideology of the social revolution in the context of liberal economic reforms in India. While India's new economic policies emphasize the benefits of competition and free markets her constitutional preferences remain embedded in legal provisions and traditions that favor social engineering in the name of economic, political and social equality. As liberalization as well as the global marketplace have become firmly established in the rhetoric and practice of elite politics, the political momentum towards economic change falls short of the numerical majorities to amend the Constitution. Consequently, India's Supreme Court judges are taking centre-stage in the field of economic liberalization, having the power to either stall or accelerate the reform process by means of judicial review. Unrestrained by the political obstacles of democratic politics the court has sketched a dialectical reform of the constitutional political economy exercising judicial restraint as the means and modes of production are freed from state control and exposing judicial activism as the judges advocate the interweaving of the distribution and consumption of wealth with the goals of the social revolution. Based on an analysis of judicial policies as well as constitutional reform debates the article maintains that the constitutional ideology of the social revolution acts as an important, if not constructive, constraint and guideline as India's policies are shifting from "empirical gradualist" socialism to empirical gradualist liberalization and globalization.
BASE
In: MTZ - Motortechnische Zeitschrift, Band 62, Heft 3, S. 250-253
ISSN: 2192-8843
In: Deutschland Archiv, Band 28, Heft 3, S. 309
ISSN: 0012-1428
In: Militärgeschichtliche Mitteilungen: MGM, Heft 1, S. 288
ISSN: 0026-3826