Suchergebnisse

Intro -- Foreword: Land Take and the Emerging Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic -- COVID-19: Environmental and Territorial Pressures -- Planning and Design Solutions -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Chapter 1: Introduction: Innovative Reflections on Land Take -- 1.1 Changed Conditions of Cities -- 1.2 Ecological Paradigms -- 1.3 Proposing a New Approach -- 1.4 Structure and Contents of the Book -- References -- Chapter 2: Land Take: From General Concerns to an Ecological Approach -- 2.1 Urban Sprawl: A Matter of Terminology, Time and Place -- 2.1.1 European Interpretations -- 2.2 In Search for Alternatives -- 2.2.1 Coping with Land Take in Global and European Policies -- 2.3 Planning Alternatives: The Quest for Limitation Towards Sustainability -- 2.4 The Environmental and Ecological Turn -- 2.5 Moving Towards a Diverse Approach to Land Take -- References -- Chapter 3: Optimising Land Use: Insights from French and Italian Planning Experiences -- 3.1 France and Italy in the European Context -- 3.1.1 An Overview on Land Take -- 3.1.2 French and Italian Planning Systems in the European Context -- 3.1.3 Institutional Setting -- 3.1.4 Planning Tools -- 3.2 Planning for Sustainability -- 3.3 Green Infrastructure in France and Italy -- 3.4 Elements of Innovation -- References -- Chapter 4: Approaches to Green Infrastructure and Ecological Preservation: Two Case Studies -- 4.1 Case 1: The Former Rhône-Alpes Region -- 4.1.1 The Cities of Grenoble and Lyon -- 4.1.2 Planning Tools -- 4.1.3 Trames Vertes et Bleues in Action: From the Regional to the Local Scale -- 4.1.4 The Urban Project Approach -- 4.2 Case 2: The Piedmont Region -- 4.2.1 Institutional and Planning Background -- 4.2.2 Sustainability Issues -- 4.2.3 Methodological Innovations in GI Construction in the Province of Turin -- References -- Chapter 5: Ecological Planning.

Intro -- Foreword by Stéphane Sadoux -- Foreword by Grazia Brunetta -- Contents -- 1 Framing Green and Blue Infrastructure -- 1.1 Urban Challenges in the Post-pandemic Era -- 1.2 Green (and Blue) Infrastructure as a Responsive Approach -- 1.3 Objectives and Contents of the Book -- 1.3.1 Experiences in Planning and Design -- References -- Part I Planning Strategies -- 2 Milton Keynes, the "Forest City". From the Landscape Planning to the Advent of the Car, Lessons for the Future Green Infrastructure? -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Elements of Context -- 2.2.1 Origins of an Urban Laboratory -- 2.2.2 Green Infrastructure: Policy Tool and Precedents -- 2.3 Milton Keynes' Landscape Planning -- 2.3.1 Milton Keynes: Supporting the Creation of Natural Habitats -- 2.3.2 Roadsides in the Service of Ecosystems -- 2.3.3 A Quest for Efficiency and Sustainability -- 2.3.4 The Aesthetics of Diversity -- 2.4 The Contribution of the Milton Keynes Case Study -- 2.4.1 Milton Keynes, an Example in the Face of Current Challenges -- 2.5 Field Investigations, Observation of Ecosystem Services Provided -- 2.6 Conclusion -- References -- 3 Towards a Method of Assessing the Well-Being Brought by Landscape and Heritage Along a Blue and Green Infrastructure: The Loire Valley (France) -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.2 A Method as a Tool for Understanding -- 3.3 Outcomes -- 3.3.1 Portrait of the Territory and Its Evolution (Stages 1 and 2) -- 3.3.2 Description of the Experiences of Territorial Dynamics by the Inhabitants (Step 3) -- 3.4 Conclusions -- References -- 4 Unfolding the Aniene River in Peri-Urban Rome. From Conflicts to Opportunities for a Sustainable Strategy -- 4.1 The Green Infrastructure Approach for Spatial Planning -- 4.2 Designing and Performing the Aniene River as a Green Blue Infrastructure -- 4.2.1 Overlapping Identities Across Time and Space.

This book analyses international Green Infrastructure (GI) planning and design strategies. The GI strategy is widely recognized for its multifunctionality (as a tool for ecological, economic and social enhancement) and multiscalarity. Starting from this assumption, the book intends to implement the concept of GI and blue networks in planning strategies and their linked urban projects. New urban and regional paradigms of the latest years, such as urban sprawl, ecosystem services, biodiversity, urban resilience, climate change and health emergencies, have made it necessary to rethink cities and territories and their related plans and projects. To satisfy these paradigms, worldwide plans and projects have started to focus both on short-term and long-term processes and strategies which integrate environmental, landscape and ecological elements. Chapters 1 and 6 are available open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License via link.springer.com.

National audience ; While in France, the law «portant Engagement National pour l'Environnement» (2010) has legally recognized the tool of Trame verte et bleue, in Italy, the "reti ecologiche" has not yet been the subject of any national legislation. Whereas the French regional planning experiments (Schéma régional de cohérence écologique) are carried out within a framework defined by the Environmental and Urban Planning Codes, in Italy, Regions have experimented some first attempts. These attempts are diversified: some have opted for a normative or design approach to ecological networks, while others have used landscape planning (related to the application of the 2004 «Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio» to preserve or restore ecological connectivity. The article focuses on two case studies, the French and Italian one, with an emphasis on regional experiences on the one hand (Piedmont and Auvergne Rhône-Alpes), and on their translation into supra-local and local planning (Provincial Coordination Territorial Plan and Regulatory Plan in Italy, Territorial Coherence Scheme and Local Urban Plan in France) on the other hand. ; Si en France, la loi portant Engagement National pour l'Environnement (2010) a reconnu juridiquement la Trame Verte et Bleue, en Italie le « reti ecologiche » ne font l'objet d'aucune transcription dans la législation nationale. Alors que les expériences françaises de planification régionale (Schéma de cohérence écologique) sont conduites dans un cadre défini par les Codes de l'environnement et de l'urbanisme, en Italie, les Régions ont mené de manière plus libre des expérimentations, certaines faisant le choix d'une approche normative ou projectuelle des réseaux écologiques, alors que d'autres ont utilisé la planification paysagère (liée à l'application du « Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio » de 2004) pour préserver ou restaurer une connectivité écologique. L'article s'attache à mettre en perspective les deux cas français et italien, en mettant l'accent sur les expériences ...

National audience ; While in France, the law «portant Engagement National pour l'Environnement» (2010) has legally recognized the tool of Trame verte et bleue, in Italy, the "reti ecologiche" has not yet been the subject of any national legislation. Whereas the French regional planning experiments (Schéma régional de cohérence écologique) are carried out within a framework defined by the Environmental and Urban Planning Codes, in Italy, Regions have experimented some first attempts. These attempts are diversified: some have opted for a normative or design approach to ecological networks, while others have used landscape planning (related to the application of the 2004 «Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio» to preserve or restore ecological connectivity. The article focuses on two case studies, the French and Italian one, with an emphasis on regional experiences on the one hand (Piedmont and Auvergne Rhône-Alpes), and on their translation into supra-local and local planning (Provincial Coordination Territorial Plan and Regulatory Plan in Italy, Territorial Coherence Scheme and Local Urban Plan in France) on the other hand. ; Si en France, la loi portant Engagement National pour l'Environnement (2010) a reconnu juridiquement la Trame Verte et Bleue, en Italie le « reti ecologiche » ne font l'objet d'aucune transcription dans la législation nationale. Alors que les expériences françaises de planification régionale (Schéma de cohérence écologique) sont conduites dans un cadre défini par les Codes de l'environnement et de l'urbanisme, en Italie, les Régions ont mené de manière plus libre des expérimentations, certaines faisant le choix d'une approche normative ou projectuelle des réseaux écologiques, alors que d'autres ont utilisé la planification paysagère (liée à l'application du « Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio » de 2004) pour préserver ou restaurer une connectivité écologique. L'article s'attache à mettre en perspective les deux cas français et italien, en mettant l'accent sur les expériences régionales d'une part (Piémont et Auvergne Rhône-Alpes), sur leur traduction dans la planification locale (Plan de coordination et Plan régulateur en Italie, Schéma de cohérence territoriale et Plan local d'urbanisme en France) de l'autre.