Suchergebnisse
Filter
39 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Negotiating with North Korea … Again
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 63, Heft 6, S. 101-106
ISSN: 1468-2699
Negotiating with North Korea...again
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 63, Heft 6, S. 101-106
ISSN: 0039-6338
World Affairs Online
Reviews & Essays - Terror In Extremis - The nuclear apocalypse is everyone's worst nightmare. A suitcase laden with nuclear material. A dirty bomb in a major city. How real is the nuclear terrorism threat?
In: The national interest, Heft 98, S. 74-78
ISSN: 0884-9382
Averting Nuclear Catastrophe: Contemplating Extreme Responses to U.S. Vulnerability
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 607, Heft 1, S. 51-58
ISSN: 1552-3349
Traditional deterrence is not an effective approach toward terrorist groups bent on causing a nuclear catastrophe. Preventive strategies, which call for the elimination of an enemy before it is able to attack, are highly risky and often difficult to implement. The United States should instead consider a policy of expanded deterrence, which focuses not on the would-be nuclear terrorists but on those states that may deliberately transfer or inadvertently leak nuclear weapons and materials to them. By threatening retaliation against those states, the United States may be able to deter that which it cannot physically prevent.
Averting Nuclear Catastrophe: Contemplating Extreme Responses to U.S. Vulnerability
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 607, S. 51-58
ISSN: 1552-3349
Traditional deterrence is not an effective approach toward terrorist groups bent on causing a nuclear catastrophe. Preventive strategies, which call for the elimination of an enemy before it is able to attack, are highly risky & often difficult to implement. The United States should instead consider a policy of expanded deterrence, which focuses not on the would-be nuclear terrorists but on those states that may deliberately transfer or inadvertently leak nuclear weapons & materials to them. By threatening retaliation against those states, the United States may be able to deter that which it cannot physically prevent. References. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2006 The American Academy of Political and Social Science.]
Averting nuclear catastrophe: contemplating extreme responses to U.S. vulnerability
In: The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Band 607, Heft 1, S. 51-58
ISSN: 0002-7162
Traditional deterrence is not an effective approach toward terrorist groups bent on causing a nuclear catastrophe. Preventive strategies, which call for the elimination of an enemy before it is able to attack, are highly risky and often difficult to implement. The United States should instead consider a policy of expanded deterrence, which focuses not on the would-be nuclear terrorists but on those states that may deliberately transfer or inadvertently leak nuclear weapons and materials to them. By threatening retaliation against those states, the United States may be able to deter that which it cannot physically prevent.[Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2006 The American Academy of Political and Social Science.]
Nuclear shockwaves: ramification of the North Korean nuclear test
In: Arms control today, Band 36, Heft 9, S. 6-8
ISSN: 0196-125X
World Affairs Online
Preventing the Unthinkable
In: The national interest, Heft 81, S. 129-131
ISSN: 0884-9382
Galluci reviews Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe by Graham Allison.
Reviews & Essays - Preventing the Unthinkable - Graham Allison paints a frightful picture of nuclear terrorism. But all is not yet lost
In: The national interest, Heft 81, S. 129-131
ISSN: 0884-9382
BUREAUS - Dean, School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University
In: Harvard international review, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 84
ISSN: 0739-1854
A question of strategic nuclear weapons policy
In: Naval War College review, Band 55, Heft 1, S. 129-132
ISSN: 0028-1484
Non-proliferation and national security
In: Arms control today, Band 24, Heft 3, S. 13-16
ISSN: 0196-125X
World Affairs Online
Redirecting the Soviet weapons establishment: Ein ACT Interview with Ambassador Robert L. Gallucci
In: Arms control today, Band 22, Heft 5, S. 3-6
ISSN: 0196-125X
World Affairs Online
The Counterinsurgency Era: U.S. Doctrine and Performance, 1950 to the Present, by Douglas S. Blaufarb
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 93, Heft 3, S. 502-503
ISSN: 1538-165X