Suchergebnisse

The European Union requires that major legislative actions undergo an impact assessment (IA), but this methodology is often not adapted to policy measures in complex situations, as the coexistence of marine protected areas and small scale fisheries. The appropriateness of the IA methodology currently in use is tested on the example of a small scale fishery in a protected area in the German coast in the Baltic Sea (Fehmarn island). The impact of the fisheries management measures is first assessed using the available data and the results are then checked with the local fishermen and a producer organization representative using a focus group. Given the discrepancies identified in the focus group, additional methodologies are explored. By performing a literature review and a workshop with scientists, fishermen representatives, environmental organizations and managers, inputs from political science (the "wicked problem" approach) and philosophy of science (the NUSAP matrix) are applied to cope with the context of high uncertainty driven by poor ecological, economic and social data. This case study brings the opportunity to identify challenges as the assessment of biodiversity and potentially conflictive differences in national policy objectives under different EU policies (including the Common Fisheries Policy), in a way that goes beyond the contribution of other commonly used management tools as impact assessment and spatial planning. The usefulness of the approach resides both in a better identification of impacts on small scale fisheries and the unveiling of hidden governance conflicts that prevent the fulfilment of the objectives of policy measures.

The lack of clarity in the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) must be addressed to create a more efficient balance across diverse ecological, economic and social dimensions. Particularly economic and social objectives present at an overarching level must be made explicit and addressed in lower level management measures, in order to link them to biological objectives and allow policy to build a balance across types of objectives. Selecting clear objectives is essential, particularly for policy impact assessment. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate how more specific high level objectives to managing fisheries can be derived from stakeholders. The paper first reviews the definition of objectives, from a historical and conceptual perspective. Secondly, it discusses the issues of manageability and acceptability, and finally describes an articulation of the high level objectives derived from extensive stakeholder consultations at European and regional level. The results from workshops at the European level to identify objectives were further examined at regional level for the Baltic and North Seas in additional individual consultations. The German case addresses two seas (Baltic and North Seas), has a complex governance structure (due to federalism) and significant roles for the three types of actors (industry, government and environmental NGOs). The analysis suggests that establishing higher level sustainability objectives within the CFP can help diverse interest groups to develop a consensus on management actions to meet complex social goals.

The Working Group on Maritime Systems (WGMARS) is a forum for interdisciplinary perspectives on ecosystem science, advice, and governance. It engages with maritime stakeholders from across the North Atlantic to take into consideration and better understand their perspectives. From 2020-2022 WGMARS is focused on methodological, operational, contextual, and science management aspects enabling ecosystem-based maritime management/governance. Topics addressed in this report include the ways that behavioural economics could inform and could be used for an enhanced understanding of fisheries management, the development and use of integrated ecosystem assessments (IEA) in ICES, the types and extent of connectivity among ICES expert groups based on Social Network Analysis (SNA) and the ways in which (IEA), Ecosystem Based Management (EBM), and MSP (Marine Spatial Planning) are implemented in different European Union (EU) member states, the EU, and the United States. Plans for a systematic literature review of the relevance of behavioural economics in fisheries management were developed. Related work on nudging in fisheries management and compliance with marine mammal protection regulations was summarized. Interviews with ten ICES regional IEA expert groups have been completed. Preliminary analyses have identified commonalities and differences among groups, in relation to topics such as contributions to ICES advice, the role of social scientists, the maturity of the IEA they conduct, resource needs, the role of stakeholders and the balance between descriptive and quantitative science. SNA, using a database of 2015-2019 attendees at ICES expert groups, is being used to quantify the centrality of a node expert group in relation to other expert groups in any given year. Four measures of centrality have been adopted: degree centrality, betweenness centrality, closeness centrality, and eigenvector centrality. Results of the analysis will reveal the strengths and types of connections among ICES expert groups, which are expected to influence the effectiveness and impact of ICES ecosy stem and sustainability science.With regard to the implementation of IEA, WGMARS reviewed the development of the national IEA program in the United States, based on reported talks from relevant scientists and managers. At future meetings, the outcomes of this review will be compared those for IEA implementation in other countries and regions .

In der vorliegenden Stellungnahme setzt sich das Thünen-Institut mit der Frage auseinander, wie sich wichtige Strategiepapiere, die die EU-Kommission und die Bundesregierung im zurückliegenden Jahr veröffentlicht haben, voraussichtlich auf Landwirtschaft, Forstwirtschaft und Fischerei auswirken werden. Im Einzelnen handelt es sich um: Green Deal, Farm-to-Fork-Strategie, Biodiversitätsstrategie 2030, Aktionsprogramm Insektenschutz. Die Strategiepapiere sind zumeist vage formuliert und lassen hinsichtlich der jeweils erforderlichen Politikmaßnahmen einen weiten Interpretationsspielraum zu. Eine solide quantitative Politikfolgen-abschätzung ist somit nicht möglich, denn deren Ergebnisse hingen von zahlreichen (spekulativen) Annahmen über konkrete Politikmaßnahmen ab. Außerdem weisen die Papiere erhebliche thematische Überschneidungen auf, d. h. ein und dasselbe Themenfeld (z. B. Klimaschutz, Biodiversität) wird in mehreren Strategiepapieren adressiert. Vor diesem Hintergrund beschränkt sich die vorliegende Stellungnahme darauf, für die Gesamtheit der Strategien qualitativ abzuschätzen, wie sich bestimmte Themenfelder voraussichtlich entwickeln werden, sofern die Politik die in den Strategien deklarierten Ziele mit bestimmten Maßnahmen (Politikoptionen) verfolgen wird. Aus dieser Diskussion der verschiedenen Politikoptionen werden Empfehlungen an die Politik abgeleitet.

In der vorliegenden Stellungnahme setzt sich das Thünen-Institut mit der Frage auseinander, wie sich wichtige Strategiepapiere, die die EU-Kommission und die Bundesregierung im zurückliegenden Jahr veröffentlicht haben, voraussichtlich auf Landwirtschaft, Forstwirtschaft und Fischerei auswirken werden. Im Einzelnen handelt es sich um: Green Deal, Farm-to-Fork-Strategie, Biodiversitätsstrategie 2030, Aktionsprogramm Insektenschutz. Die Strategiepapiere sind zumeist vage formuliert und lassen hinsichtlich der jeweils erforderlichen Politikmaßnahmen einen weiten Interpretationsspielraum zu. Eine solide quantitative Politikfolgen-abschätzung ist somit nicht möglich, denn deren Ergebnisse hingen von zahlreichen (spekulativen) Annahmen über konkrete Politikmaßnahmen ab. Außerdem weisen die Papiere erhebliche thematische Überschneidungen auf, d. h. ein und dasselbe Themenfeld (z. B. Klimaschutz, Biodiversität) wird in mehreren Strategiepapieren adressiert. Vor diesem Hintergrund beschränkt sich die vorliegende Stellungnahme darauf, für die Gesamtheit der Strategien qualitativ abzuschätzen, wie sich bestimmte Themenfelder voraussichtlich entwickeln werden, sofern die Politik die in den Strategien deklarierten Ziele mit bestimmten Maßnahmen (Politikoptionen) verfolgen wird. Aus dieser Diskussion der verschiedenen Politikoptionen werden Empfehlungen an die Politik abgeleitet.