Emile Durkheim Revisited: Les Corps intermediaires
In: Citizenship studies, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 313-328
ISSN: 1362-1025
Discusses the relevance of Emile Durkheim for contemporary debates about citizenship & democracy. If the concepts of social bonds & solidarity that have existed since the classical period of the welfare state are under revision, the question is whether the thought of Durkheim has lost relevance too? Talcott Parsons's (1965) interpretation of Durkheim as a theorist of social order is criticized, arguing that Durkheim did not look for a functional order of the Parsonian type. More likely, he was preoccupied with the paradoxes & problems of the liberal state, ie, the search for a type of authority compatible with modern individual rights. Durkheim's focal interest in intermediary institutions is analyzed & related to the neoliberal view of the welfare state as having too much influence over the individual. Forgetting that intermediary bodies are important preconditions for the construction of citizenship & modern democracies, the communitarian vision of modern intermediary bodies in the 1990s is criticized for being too local. 41 References. Adapted from the source document.