Suchergebnisse
Filter
8 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Book Review: Child Care in Black and White: Working Parents and the History of Orphanages
In: Journal of family history: studies in family, kinship and demography, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 246-248
ISSN: 1552-5473
Innovations and Accountability: Vouchers, Charters, and the Florida Virtual School
Florida's system of accountability relies heavily on state-wide testing, and the state's choice options remain largely outside the testing program. This brief provides recommendations for Florida policymakers to ensure that children are able to gain access to the best possible system of education.
BASE
Using program theory to replicate successful programs
In: New directions for evaluation: a publication of the American Evaluation Association, Band 2000, Heft 87, S. 71-78
ISSN: 1534-875X
AbstractProgram theory evaluation can provide the kind of detailed information about what aspects of a program lead to success that is needed to replicate programs in new and varied settings.
Program theory evaluation: Practice, promise, and problems
In: New directions for evaluation: a publication of the American Evaluation Association, Band 2000, Heft 87, S. 5-13
ISSN: 1534-875X
AbstractThe historical development of program theory evaluation, current variations in theory and practice, and pressing issues are discussed.
Editors' notes
In: New directions for evaluation: a publication of the American Evaluation Association, Band 2000, Heft 87, S. 1-3
ISSN: 1534-875X
US state government and DARE: the story in four states
In: Evidence & policy: a journal of research, debate and practice, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 291-319
ISSN: 1744-2656
English
In contrast to the widespread local popularity of the police-led Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) school-based programme, evaluation studies have consistently questioned its sustained impact on adolescent drug use. Our focus in this article is on the role of state government in DARE policy. Semi-structured personal interviews were conducted with 30 people, including past or present state agency officials and external researchers. These cases are organised chronologically along three time periods: (1) the genesis and expansion of DARE; (2) the resiliency of the programme to negative evaluation evidence; and (3) the decline of DARE.