As we have seen in its fact, the reformation program which is implemented not on the base of the Indonesian nation's core philosophy drags Indonesian to come into multi-crisis situation. The violence conflict, terrorism, ethnical, racial, class and religious conflicts in this country had sacrificed a big amount of innocence nation's generation. All of that is caused by unemployed philosophical base of Indonesian state, Pancasila which is dealt with divinity values, humanity, nationality, democracy and social justice in the process of reformation. Therefore, to form the democratic, religious and civilized society in the process of reformation since globalization era, the revitalization of nation state's philosophical foundation is a must. In addition to form such society, the bureaucrats and political elites ought to develop their political communication attitude based on the morality, religious and civilized values as its result as to realize the welfare society on the togetherness as its foundation. In accordance with both national and rural developments, the philosophy of nation-state must be despised as the foundation of paradigmatic orientation of culture strategy because of national and rural developments are complex problem. Philosophy provides an inter-connected policy foundations and guidance in finding a wise solution to the complex problem.
The use of the term "Four Pillars" by the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia (MPR RI) since the end of 2009 has generated numerous debates in Indonesian political life. The term of Four Pillars that consists of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, NKRI (Unitary State of the Republik of Indonesia), and Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity) is affected by the essence, meaning, and understanding of the four in their original meanings. This research aims to examine and analysis on the philosophical problem of Four Pillars terms in the context of philosophy of language especially in the context of contestation of meaning and the essence of Four Pillars term in public discourse and debate. The research was conducted in 2014 to 2018 through literature studies in Yogyakarta. The research fnds that the term of "four pillars" since it was produced by political elites through the public education program has degraded and legitimized the meaning of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, NKRI (Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia), and Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity). Philosophically, the use of term of four pillars for public education to introduce national insight conducted by the People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia has distorting of meaning and displacing of meaning of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, NKRI, and Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. The term of "four pillars" is also not yet known in this history or by the public.
AbstractThe term Four Pillar became a public debate. The main problem is the use of the Four Pillars term consisting of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, NKRI, and Bhinneka Tunggal Ika has raised questions from the community. This research is a qualitative research that examines the existing norms and legislation through the normative laws approach. The purpose of this research is to analyze the normative laws and the impact of the Constitutional Court's decision on the use of the Four Pillars term. The Constitutional Court's decision is in accordance with the logic of legal language and the prevailing rules related to the concept and the nature of Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia, and Unity in Diversity can not be categorized into one of the same variants is true. In this case the MPR RI has made a mistake in the language logic using the term 4 Pilar MPR RI. IntisariIstilah Empat Pilar menjadi perdebatan publik. Pokok persoalannya yaitu penggunaan istilah Empat Pilar yang terdiri atas Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika telah menimbulkan pertanyaan dari masyarakat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif yang mengkaji norma dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada melalui pendekatan penelitian hukum normatif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis dasar normatif dampak putusan MK terhadap penggunaan istilah Empat Pilar. Putusan MK telah sesuai dengan kaidah logika bahasa hukum dan kaidah yang berlaku terkait dengan konsep dan hakikat Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika tidak dapat dikategorikan menjadi satu varian yang sama. Dalam hal ini MPR RI telah melakukan kesalahan logika bahasa dalam menggunakan istilah 4 Pilar MPR RI.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis terkait problem penggunaan istilah 4 Pilar Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara atau 4 Pilar MPR RI yang menimbulkan banyak kritik dan pertentangan di masyarakat. Istilah 4 Pilar yang mengkatgorikan Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika sebagai bagian dari pilar menjadi polemik sejak MPR RI menggunakan istilah tersebut sebagai program sosialisasinya. Studi ilmu politik dan sosial jarang meneliti dan menganalisis terkait implikasi dari politik bahasa dalam penggunaan istilah kenegaraan seperti Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. Penelitian ini merupakan bagian dari disertasi yang menganalisis secara kritis tentang penggunaan istilah 4 Pilar Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara melalui kajian filsafati yang ditinjau dari perspektif Filsafat Bahasa. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan filsafat analitika bahasa. Data primer dalam penelitian ini diperoleh melalui kajian pustaka, dan analisis teks wacana yang berkembang tentang polemik dan perdebatan 4 Pilar baik secara online maupun offline. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pertama, penggunaan istilah 4 Pilar Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara dengan mengkategorikan Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika sebagai pilar tidak tepat. Kedua, penggunaan istilah 4 Pilar tidak dikenal dalam sejarah dan memori kolektif bangsa Indonesia untuk menyebut Pancasila, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika sebagai bagian pilar. Ketiga, penggunaan istilah 4 Pilar oleh MPR RI merupakan kesalahan kategoris. Keempat, kegiatan sosialisasi 4 Pilar yang dilakukan justru mendelegitimasi makna Pancasila dan upaya pembodohan kepada masyarakat.Kata kunci: Empat Pilar, Filsafat, bahasa, Politik bahasa, deligitimasi, makna, Pancasila.
ABSTRACT This research aimed to analyzed the implementation of e-voting policy in the Election of Village Heads (Pilkades) in Boyolali Regency in 2019 and examined the implications of using e-voting in the Pilkades on regional political resilience in Boyolali Regency in 2019. The implementation of e-voting policies was analyzed using a model of the policy implementation formulated by van Meter and van Horn (1974). Regional political resilience was analyzed using indicators that embody political resilience.The method used in this research was descriptive qualitative. In obtaining data, researchers used interview research tools with the research informant as the Office of Community Empowerment (Dispermasdes) of Boyolali Regency. The research also used secondary data derived from documents found in the Dispermasdes of Boyolali Regency and other sources such as books, journals, and the internet.The results of this research showed that the implementation of e-voting policy in the Pilkades in Boyolali Regency in 2019 had been implemented well. The implementation of e-voting also achieved its goal, which was to reduced the problems that occurred in the Pilkades, especially in the recapitulation of vote counting. Besides, resource support also had an important role in implementing a policy. The attitude of the policy implementers who support it was crucial to the implementation of the policy. Communication and coordination between the Regency Election Committee, the Village Election Committee, and the Technical Team which consistent and accurate it could minimize errors. Supporting social, economic, and political conditions also influenced the implementation of policies. The policy of using e-voting in the Pilkades in Boyolali Regency in 2019 was following the aspirations of the people, fulfilled the principles of LUBER JURDIL, and could support the rule of law but the use of e-voting did not necessarily increase the level of participation so that the use of e-voting in the Pilkades did not fully realize regional political resilience indicators. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis implementasi kebijakan e-voting dalam Pilkades di Kabupaten Boyolali tahun 2019 serta mengkaji implikasi penggunaan e-voting dalam Pilkades terhadap ketahanan politik wilayah di Kabupaten Boyolali tahun 2019. Implementasi kebijakan e-voting dianalisis menggunakan model implementasi kebijakan yang dirumuskan oleh van Meter dan van Horn (1974). Ketahanan politik wilayah dianalisis menggunakan indikator-indikator yang mewujudkan ketahanan politik.Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian yaitu deskriptif kualitatif. Dalam memperoleh data, peneliti menggunakan alat penelitian wawancara dengan informan penelitian Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa (Dispermasdes) Kabupaten Boyolali. Penelitian juga menggunakan data sekunder yang berasal dari dokumen yang terdapat pada Dispermasdes Kabupaten Boyolali serta sumber-sumber lain seperti buku, jurnal dan internet.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi kebijakan e-voting dalam Pilkades di Kabupaten Boyolali tahun 2019 telah terlaksana dengan baik. Implementasi e-voting juga mencapai tujuan, yaitu mengurangi permasalahan yang terjadi dalam Pilkades, terutama dalam rekapitulasi penghitungan suara. Selain itu dukungan sumber daya juga mempunyai peran penting dalam pelaksanaan sebuah kebijakan. Sikap pelaksana kebijakan yang mendukung sangat menentukan terlaksananya kebijakan. Komunikasi dan koordinasi yang terjalin antara Panitia Pemilihan Kabupaten, Panitia Pemilihan Desa, dan Tim Teknis yang konsisten dan akurat dapat meminimalisasi kesalahan. Kondisi sosial, ekonomi, dan politik yang mendukung juga mempengaruhi terlaksananya kebijakan. Kebijakan penggunaan e-voting dalam Pilkades di Kabupaten Boyolali tahun 2019 sudah sesuai dengan aspirasi masyarakat, memenuhi asas LUBER JURDIL, dan dapat mendukung penegakan supremasi hukum akan tetapi penggunaan e-voting tidak serta-merta menaikkan tingkat partisipasi sehingga penggunaan e-voting dalam Pilkades tidak sepenuhnya mewujudkan indikator-indikator ketahanan politik wilayah.
Pancasila, as the most powerful ideology, should be implemented by the nation leader in all spheres of life, according to life philosophy "ing ngarsa sung tuladha, Ing madya mangun karsa, Tut wuri handayani", should be integrated in all aspects of democratic lives in Indonesia. If doing so, the society will have the mental protection of all Indonesian, all of Indonesia's bloodshed securely, in accordance with the objectives of the Indonesian state, united, sovereign, fair, and prosperous. But in its context, Pancasila is faced with problems such as the democracy that does not prioritize aspirations to actualize social justice and prosperity, the existence of an undirected democracy, the less and lower level of public trust in the government, the loss of noble values because everything is measured by money, and an indecisive government system that led to anarchy and radicalism. The method used in this study was descriptive qualitative philosophical, describing the data consisting of arguments and contextual events. This study focused on actual problems by understanding phenomena holistically about the concept of Pancasila as the basis and direction of democracy. This study used axiology theory; the material value that is useful for human physical life and spiritual values. The results of the study showed that the ideology of Pancasila should be the foundation of society life, nation and state of Indonesia because Pancasila is still and always relevant to protect the nation's security from radicalism, liberalism, and anarchism. As a result, the goal of Pancasila as ideology is to create fair freedom in the life of the nation.
