Suchergebnisse

The article is devoted to the study of the concept, legal nature and components of a website. Based on the method of systematic and formal analysis, the conclusion is made, that the current definition of the concept of a website gives grounds to consider it a complex object of civil rights. In the structure of the website the objects of intellectual property rights (copyright, related rights, industrial property rights), as well as such a separate object of civil rights as information can be identified. Each of these objects has its own legal regime, but the website as a whole may also act as a separate object of civil relations, be subject to legal protection as a separate object, become subject to assignments, etc. The correlation between the concepts of the website and the domain name is carried out using the comparative method. It is concluded that the website and the domain name are separate independent objects on the civil field. A domain name is not an integral part of a website and should not be passed by default upon alienation of a website. Special attention is paid to protecting the content of the website from plagiarism and piracy, as well as liability for inaccurate information posted on the site.

The purpose of the article is a study of the concept and features of human rights as the fundamental concept of modern private law. The object of research is the historical, philosophical, political, ideological, economic, social and other dimensions of the concept of human rights. The main conclusion of the scientific article is the statement of the dominant role of the concept of human rights for the development of modern society, oriented to universal human liberal values and private law, as an indispensable attribute of such a society. At the same time, authors state, that modern tendencies for further expansion of the "borders" of human rights and freedoms at the expense of the interests of the state or at the expense of other social groups have no basis. ; El propósito del artículo es un estudio a fondo del concepto y las características de los derechos humanos como el concepto fundamental del derecho privado moderno. El objeto de la investigación es la dimensión histórica, filosófica, política, ideológica, económica, social y otras del concepto de derechos humanos. La principal conclusión del artículo científico es la afirmación del papel dominante del concepto de derechos humanos para el desarrollo de la sociedad moderna, orientado a los valores liberales humanos universales y al derecho privado, como un atributo indispensable de dicha sociedad. Al mismo tiempo, las tendencias modernas para una mayor expansión de las "fronteras" de los derechos humanos y las libertades a expensas de los intereses del estado o a expensas de otros grupos sociales no tienen ninguna base. ; Метою статті є ґрунтовне дослідження поняття та ознак прав людини, як засадничої конструкції сучасного приватного права. Об'єктом дослідження є історичні, філософські, політичні, ідеологічні, економічні, соціальні та інші виміри концепції прав людини. Головним висновком наукової статті є констатування домінуючої ролі концепції прав людини для розвитку сучасного суспільства, що орієнтується на загальнолюдські ліберальні цінності та приватного права, як неодмінного атрибуту такого суспільства. При цьому, сучасні тенденції до подальшого розширення «меж» прав і свобод людини за рахунок інтересів держави або за рахунок інших соціальних груп не мають під собою жодних підстав.

The purpose of the article is a study of the concept and features of human rights as the fundamental concept of modern private law. The object of research is the historical, philosophical, political, ideological, economic, social and other dimensions of the concept of human rights. The main conclusion of the scientific article is the statement of the dominant role of the concept of human rights for the development of modern society, oriented to universal human liberal values and private law, as an indispensable attribute of such a society. At the same time, authors state, that modern tendencies for further expansion of the "borders" of human rights and freedoms at the expense of the interests of the state or at the expense of other social groups have no basis.