Suchergebnisse

Regional politics is the common denominator of democracy and market economy. A state can be strong only if strong regions are developed, since the main principle of increasing the level of democracy in society is an effective local government as close as possible to the people. The right of citizens to govern the state is realized primarily at the local level. It is here that there is a chance like nowhere else to reveal the initiative of millions of citizens, involve them in public life. If there is no such local authority in the state, then there is no democracy in it either. At the same time, the problem of regional policy is no less important. After all, each of the regions of the state has its own specifics, and only with its consideration we can achieve a harmonious balance of national and local interests. In reality, we have a number of screaming problems: depressed areas of mining settlements, small towns, etc., of which, in the end, are the big problems of Ukraine. Taking this into account, the absence of a balanced regional policy leads to the disintegration of any country, which is a particularly dangerous factor for states with a short history of democratic development.

Categories compromise in political activities of political parties centrism direction are quite relevance in the modern political life of Ukrainian society. The social base of political centrism is the middle strata of society, in the so-called «middle class» intellectuals and officials of middle-income, skilled workers. Executive power is based on the centrist majority, usually steady and consistent in implementing policy. Political centrism reflected also in the spectrum of social consciousness, political science, in philosophy, politics in the form of concepts, policies. Philosophy centrism expresses moderation necessity of dialogue, consensus, compromise, focuses on the gradual transformation of an evolutionary path, avoiding the possibility of aggravation while driving social systems that are relevant for modern Ukrainian political life.The purpose of this article to answer the question of the existence of the political center, the use of policy trade-offs in activity centrist political parties as an example the recent parliamentary elections. The theory of «political center» is not possible without the use of the principle of compromise in contemporary political life for the present mattered achieve historic compromise – first supreme agreements on the peaceful resolution of conflicts, which allows to shape the constitution of European countries Political compromises, as practice shows, subject to strategic goals and objectives of the country, state, region, ethnic group, political party, etc. They should be timely, because the delay in compromise render it meaningless or makes it impossible to conclude the agreement. Political compromises should not lead to disruption, and especially to the destruction of moral values in society. The success of the compromise agreement depends on the following factors. First, is the refusal by the political elite as the ruling and opposition, on the approach to politics only as a struggle between different forces for power sector confrontation and rivalry, the transition to the path of dialogue, the path of adjustment contradictions in society. This is relevant for contemporary Ukrainian centrism parties. Political compromise gives effect when both parties are aware of its importance, followed him with the desire and the desire to find a consensus on important issues of political life, time to conclude a compromise agreement.Today centrism political parties completely ignore this compromise (February events in Parliament), which evidence of weakness and political convention center centrism general and political parties in particular.Summing up, it can be seen that centrism as a political compromise is still not a significant factor in the life of modern Ukraine, but the appeal of modern centrism is that today it is a dream and utopia can become a real possibility. Ideological and theoretical task of modern centrism is that scientific development philosophy centrism were philosophy complementarity, sociology centrism – innovations social relations and political programs centrism produced as programs struggle really civilized way of truly civil society, all this provides the scientific perspective in further substantiating the category of political centrism and compromise. ; Задача этой статьи ответить на вопрос существования политического центра, использование политики компромиссов в деятельности центристских политических партий на примере последних парламентских выборов.Подводя итоги, можно отметить, что центризм как политический компромисс еще не стал влиятельным фактором в жизни современной Украины, но привлекательность современного центризма заключается в том, что сегодня он из мечты и утопии может стать реальной возможностью.Идейно-теоретическое задача современного центризма заключается в том, чтобы научные разработки философии центризма были философией взаимного дополнения. Социология центризма – новацией неантагонистических социальных отношений, а политические программы центризма производились, как программы борьбы за цивилизованное устройство гражданского общества. Все это придает научную перспективу в обосновании категории политического центризма и компромисса ; Завдання цієї статті відповісти на питання існування політичного центру, використання політики компромісів в діяльності центристських політичних партій на прикладі останніх парламентських виборів. центризм як політичний компроміс ще не став впливовим чинником в житті сучасної України, але привабливість сучасного центризму полягає в тому, що сьогодні він із мрії та утопії може стати реальною можливістю. Ідейно-теоретичне завдання сучасного центризму полягає в тому, щоб наукові розробки філософії центризму були філософією взаємного доповнення, соціології центризму – новаціями неантагоністичних соціальних відносин, а політичні програми центризму вироблялися як програми боротьби за дійсно цивілізований устрій дійсно громадянського суспільства, все це надає наукову перспективу в подальшому обґрунтуванні категорії політичного центризму, та компромісу.

На протяжении веков универсальной, консолидирующей, мотивационно-инспирирующей силой во многих общественных системах выступала церковь. Поэтому ее мощный духовный потенциал становится особенно остро востребован в периоды общественных кризисов, трансформаций и нестабильности. Однако он до сих пор остается до конца не изученным и не исследованным в отечественной политологической мысли. Особенно мало исследованным остается такой важный поворотный момент в истории христианской церкви, как начало ее преобразование в один из основных политических институтов политической системы древнерусского общества. Изучению данного факта и посвящена предлагаемая статья ; The Church was the universal, unifying, motivational andinspiring force in many social systems for centuries. So itspowerful spiritual potential is particularly acute in demand intimes of social crises, transformations and instability. However,this potential is still not fully known, and was not used in thenational political science practice. Such an important momentin the history of the Christian church as the beginning of itstransformation into one of the main institutions of the politicalsystem of ancient society is especially little studied. The proposedarticle is devoted to the exploration of this fact.Since its formation and development of ecclesiasticalorganization of Kievan Rus became actively involved in politicallife and quickly became avatar the state, contributing to itsformation, integration, consolidation and development.However, this process wasn't painless. According to mosthistorians, in some regions of Rus Christianity was literallyforced upon, and in some states, such as Novgorod, Suzdal, socialprotests against the new religion took the form of religious andpolitical struggle. But in this case the church should not be putto blame of social protests and irregularities. On the contrary,there is evidence that the church has served as the stabilizationof the system during its transformation into a feudal society.For example, the church organization had sufficiently flexiblepolicy, which includes the protection for the most disadvantagedgroups of the population of the Old Russian state. With methodsavailable to her, it rose against the feudal arbitrariness, hardextortions from the people and extremes of the social life of thetime. Such activity, of course, was not completely effective, butstill objectively helped to smooth the social contradictions andmaintain a relatively stable and peaceful situation in the country.This article is particularly pointed out to such politicalfunctions of the church, as legitimating, integrative, culturetranslating,philosophical, communicative, psychotherapeuticand educational. This function certainly evolved over time,depending on the prevailing historical and political situation(for example, the balance of political forces, the national interest,national status of the church, etc.). ; Впродовж століть універсальною, консолідуючою,мотиваційно-інспіруючою силою в багатьох суспільнихсистемах виступала церква. Тому її потужнього духовногопотенціалу в рамках політичного функціонування особливогостро потребують періоди суспільних криз, трансформаційі нестабільності. Проте, цей потенціал й досі залишаєтьсямало вивченим та дослідженим у вітчизняній політологічнійдумці. Зокрема, мало дослідженим залишається такийважливий поворотний момент в історії християнськоїцеркви, як початок перетворення церковної організації водин з головних політичних інститутів соціально-політичноїсистеми давньоруського суспільства. Дослідженню даногофеномену і присвячена пропонована стаття.