Suchergebnisse

Straipsnyje nagrinėjami rusų kilmės Antrojo pasaulinio karo pabėgėlių iš Lietuvos ryšiai su rusų diaspora JAV, gilinamasi į individualias dalyvavimo rusų emigrantų religinių ir visuomeninių organizacijų veikloje patirtis bei istorinėse rusų stačiatikių kapinėse išlikusių antkapinių paminklų spektrą. Atsižvelgiama į tai, kokios įtakos rusų kilmės karo pabėgėlių iš Lietuvos ryšiams su rusų diaspora turėjo kilmė, šeiminiai ir socialiniai ryšiai, Lietuvoje ir svetur įgytas išsilavinimas, darbinės ir visuomeninės veiklos patirtys. Tyrimas atskleidė, kad Antrojo pasaulinio karo pabėgėliai iš Lietuvos, išlikę ištikimi rusų kultūrai ir išlaisvintos iš komunizmo Rusijos idėjai, JAV įsijungė į visuomeninę veiklą, kuria siekta supažindinti amerikiečius su ikirevoliucinės Rusijos kultūrinėmis ir religinėmis tradicijomis, demaskuoti komunistinę ideologiją. Dalis pabėgėlių, kaip ir rusų diaspora, įsiliejo į užsienio Rusų stačiatikių bažnyčios, priešiškos SSRS atžvilgiu dėl religinio persekiojimo, dvasininkų ir tikinčiųjų bendruomenes.

The present article discusses the relationship between tradition of Lithuania's statehood of February 16th and identity formation of Lithuanian Russians in 20th century. The past of Russian ethnic group in Lithuania is most often interpreted by contemporary public discourse (politicians, online and printed media) considering two different perspectives. The first one is based on dominant in Lithuania narrative of the soviet occupation and the other one deal with official position of Russia to the history of World War II and politics of commemoration of its victims. Differences that characterize these two narratives lead often to presentation of various negative aspects from the past of Lithuanian-Russians relations in public discourse. 100th anniversary of restoration of Lithuania's statehood serves as opportunity for analysis of alternative (positive) experiences based on common history. That's why the present article focuses on family story of lawyer Jonas Tatarincevas who lived in Kaunas 1918–1941 and made his contribution to development of Lithuania's statehood. It is revealed in the article what was influence of most important political processes of the first half of 20th century to formation of civic, ethnic and cultural identity of Jonas Tatarincevas and his family members. The family story of Jonas Tatarincevas symbolizes integration of Russians to Lithuanian society combining loyalty to tradition of Lithuanian statehood of February 16th and preservation of non-dominant ethnic and cultural identity. It is concluded that during the first Soviet occupation (1940–1941) many well-integrated families of Russian intelligentsia in Kaunas shared a similar loss to thousands families of Lithuanians (arrests, repressions, deportations). This kind of historical experiences are still not reflected in contemporary Lithuania's public discourse and dominant historical narrative.

The present article discusses the relationship between tradition of Lithuania's statehood of February 16th and identity formation of Lithuanian Russians in 20th century. The past of Russian ethnic group in Lithuania is most often interpreted by contemporary public discourse (politicians, online and printed media) considering two different perspectives. The first one is based on dominant in Lithuania narrative of the soviet occupation and the other one deal with official position of Russia to the history of World War II and politics of commemoration of its victims. Differences that characterize these two narratives lead often to presentation of various negative aspects from the past of Lithuanian-Russians relations in public discourse. 100th anniversary of restoration of Lithuania's statehood serves as opportunity for analysis of alternative (positive) experiences based on common history. That's why the present article focuses on family story of lawyer Jonas Tatarincevas who lived in Kaunas 1918–1941 and made his contribution to development of Lithuania's statehood. It is revealed in the article what was influence of most important political processes of the first half of 20th century to formation of civic, ethnic and cultural identity of Jonas Tatarincevas and his family members. The family story of Jonas Tatarincevas symbolizes integration of Russians to Lithuanian society combining loyalty to tradition of Lithuanian statehood of February 16th and preservation of non-dominant ethnic and cultural identity. It is concluded that during the first Soviet occupation (1940–1941) many well-integrated families of Russian intelligentsia in Kaunas shared a similar loss to thousands families of Lithuanians (arrests, repressions, deportations). This kind of historical experiences are still not reflected in contemporary Lithuania's public discourse and dominant historical narrative.

The present article discusses the relationship between tradition of Lithuania's statehood of February 16th and identity formation of Lithuanian Russians in 20th century. The past of Russian ethnic group in Lithuania is most often interpreted by contemporary public discourse (politicians, online and printed media) considering two different perspectives. The first one is based on dominant in Lithuania narrative of the soviet occupation and the other one deal with official position of Russia to the history of World War II and politics of commemoration of its victims. Differences that characterize these two narratives lead often to presentation of various negative aspects from the past of Lithuanian-Russians relations in public discourse. 100th anniversary of restoration of Lithuania's statehood serves as opportunity for analysis of alternative (positive) experiences based on common history. That's why the present article focuses on family story of lawyer Jonas Tatarincevas who lived in Kaunas 1918–1941 and made his contribution to development of Lithuania's statehood. It is revealed in the article what was influence of most important political processes of the first half of 20th century to formation of civic, ethnic and cultural identity of Jonas Tatarincevas and his family members. The family story of Jonas Tatarincevas symbolizes integration of Russians to Lithuanian society combining loyalty to tradition of Lithuanian statehood of February 16th and preservation of non-dominant ethnic and cultural identity. It is concluded that during the first Soviet occupation (1940–1941) many well-integrated families of Russian intelligentsia in Kaunas shared a similar loss to thousands families of Lithuanians (arrests, repressions, deportations). This kind of historical experiences are still not reflected in contemporary Lithuania's public discourse and dominant historical narrative.

The present article discusses the relationship between tradition of Lithuania's statehood of February 16th and identity formation of Lithuanian Russians in 20th century. The past of Russian ethnic group in Lithuania is most often interpreted by contemporary public discourse (politicians, online and printed media) considering two different perspectives. The first one is based on dominant in Lithuania narrative of the soviet occupation and the other one deal with official position of Russia to the history of World War II and politics of commemoration of its victims. Differences that characterize these two narratives lead often to presentation of various negative aspects from the past of Lithuanian-Russians relations in public discourse. 100th anniversary of restoration of Lithuania's statehood serves as opportunity for analysis of alternative (positive) experiences based on common history. That's why the present article focuses on family story of lawyer Jonas Tatarincevas who lived in Kaunas 1918–1941 and made his contribution to development of Lithuania's statehood. It is revealed in the article what was influence of most important political processes of the first half of 20th century to formation of civic, ethnic and cultural identity of Jonas Tatarincevas and his family members. The family story of Jonas Tatarincevas symbolizes integration of Russians to Lithuanian society combining loyalty to tradition of Lithuanian statehood of February 16th and preservation of non-dominant ethnic and cultural identity. It is concluded that during the first Soviet occupation (1940–1941) many well-integrated families of Russian intelligentsia in Kaunas shared a similar loss to thousands families of Lithuanians (arrests, repressions, deportations). This kind of historical experiences are still not reflected in contemporary Lithuania's public discourse and dominant historical narrative.

World War II in general and Holocaust in particular are important topics of the debate in the Lithuanian public discourse. Due to that the Lithuanian and Russian press is seen by the author not just as a significant source of information, but also as a peculiar tool for structuring knowledge about Lithuania's historical past. The article reveals that the perception of Holocaust history is changing in the Lithuanian and Russian press in recent years by rethinking of the dominant Lithuanian historical narrative and representing diverse approaches to the role of Lithuanians in collaboration with the Nazi regime. The Holocaust Discourse is constructed as important experience in considering and strengthening the human rights protection discourse in Lithuania as well. The article is based on selected texts published in 2016 by online daily DELFI and printed newspapers in the Lithuanian and Russian languages (150 publications in total).

The article analyses the basic factors (migration, political-juridical circumstances, adaptation) which had influenced the process of Russians' social integration in Lithuania from 1918 to 1940. Much attention was paid to the research of the social and cultural activity of interwar Russian intelligentsia in Lithuanian istoriography during the last 15 years. That's why the main object of this research are Russians as an integral ethnic community which consists of various social segments (peasants, workers, priests, etc.). It is concluded that the integration of Russians in Lithuania was largely determinated such dimensions like professional skills, educational level, literacy and strait.

The article analyses the basic factors (migration, political-juridical circumstances, adaptation) which had influenced the process of Russians' social integration in Lithuania from 1918 to 1940. Much attention was paid to the research of the social and cultural activity of interwar Russian intelligentsia in Lithuanian istoriography during the last 15 years. That's why the main object of this research are Russians as an integral ethnic community which consists of various social segments (peasants, workers, priests, etc.). It is concluded that the integration of Russians in Lithuania was largely determinated such dimensions like professional skills, educational level, literacy and strait.

The article analyses the basic factors (migration, political-juridical circumstances, adaptation) which had influenced the process of Russians' social integration in Lithuania from 1918 to 1940. Much attention was paid to the research of the social and cultural activity of interwar Russian intelligentsia in Lithuanian istoriography during the last 15 years. That's why the main object of this research are Russians as an integral ethnic community which consists of various social segments (peasants, workers, priests, etc.). It is concluded that the integration of Russians in Lithuania was largely determinated such dimensions like professional skills, educational level, literacy and strait.

The article analyses the basic factors (migration, political-juridical circumstances, adaptation) which had influenced the process of Russians' social integration in Lithuania from 1918 to 1940. Much attention was paid to the research of the social and cultural activity of interwar Russian intelligentsia in Lithuanian istoriography during the last 15 years. That's why the main object of this research are Russians as an integral ethnic community which consists of various social segments (peasants, workers, priests, etc.). It is concluded that the integration of Russians in Lithuania was largely determinated such dimensions like professional skills, educational level, literacy and strait.

The article analyses the basic factors (migration, political-juridical circumstances, adaptation) which had influenced the process of Russians' social integration in Lithuania from 1918 to 1940. Much attention was paid to the research of the social and cultural activity of interwar Russian intelligentsia in Lithuanian istoriography during the last 15 years. That's why the main object of this research are Russians as an integral ethnic community which consists of various social segments (peasants, workers, priests, etc.). It is concluded that the integration of Russians in Lithuania was largely determinated such dimensions like professional skills, educational level, literacy and strait.

The article analyses the basic factors (migration, political-juridical circumstances, adaptation) which had influenced the process of Russians' social integration in Lithuania from 1918 to 1940. Much attention was paid to the research of the social and cultural activity of interwar Russian intelligentsia in Lithuanian istoriography during the last 15 years. That's why the main object of this research are Russians as an integral ethnic community which consists of various social segments (peasants, workers, priests, etc.). It is concluded that the integration of Russians in Lithuania was largely determinated such dimensions like professional skills, educational level, literacy and strait.

Straipsnyje analizuojami Maskvos patriarchatui pavaldžios Lietuvos ortodoksų arkivyskupijos bendruomenės etninis ir religinis identitetai, šių identitetų pobūdį ir sąveiką lemiantys istoriniai veiksniai, šiuolaikiniai demografiniai, socialiniai ir geopolitiniai aspektai. Analizei pasitelkti 2019–2021 m. atlikti kokybiniai interviu su įvairaus amžiaus ortodoksų tikėjimą išpažįstančiais rusais arba mišrios tapatybės rusakalbiais bei ortodoksų bažnyčios atstovais (dvasininkais, religinių organizacijų atstovais, kt.) ir oficialaus arkivyskupijos žurnalo "Vestnik" (2012–2022 m.) tekstai. Atskleista, kad tyrimo laikotarpiu šiai ortodoksų bendruomenei Lietuvoje buvo svarbūs istoriškai susiklostę glaudūs ryšiai su Rusija, rusų etninis identitetas ir Rusijos ortodoksų tradicija, bet nemaža dalis šios bendruomenės tapatinosi su visuotine (Bizantijos) ir (ar) vietine (Lietuvos Didžiosios Kunigaikštystės) ortodoksų tradicijomis, taip pat susidūrė su iššūkiu prisitaikyti prie dabartinėje Lietuvos visuomenėje vykstančių socialinių demografinių ir politinių procesų (asimiliacija, mišrios šeimos, lietuvių kalbos vartojimas, geopolitiniai pokyčiai).

The causes of the emigration of the members of the Russian ethnic minority from Lithuania in the last two decades are analyzed in the article. There is a lack of official statistics about the scale (numbers) and reasons for the emigration of ethnic minority groups from Lithuania. Therefore, the qualitative data analysis of Lithuanian press in the Russian language and interviews with informants of Russian nationality is presented in the article. The qualitative data analysis allows to look at the aspects on emigration from the Russian ethnic minority group perspective. The topics of articles about emigration and emigration aspects reflected in informants' interviews are analyzed. It is considered how emigration of Russians from Lithuania is related to socio-economic, socio-psychological and other factors important to the country's development.