Suchergebnisse

<p>Este trabalho, produto de um cartel de uma Escola de Psicanálise, pretende desenvolver a concepção do objeto voz como objeto perdido da pulsão invocante, segundo Jacques Lacan, e buscar as manifestações subjetivas e formas clínicas nas quais pode-se encontrar a recuperação da voz como objeto mais-de-gozar. Neste percurso discute-se a alucinação sonora, a ruminação obsessiva e o insulto entre outros fenômenos. Num segundo momento discute-se o lugar da função poética na interpretação psicanalítica, tomando a materialidade sonora, a assonância e os afetos provocados pela poesia como recuperação imaginária de um gozo perdido. Conclui-se que, uma vez que a voz se faça estruturalmente objeto perdido, não há emissão significante que não carregue um enigma, não há endereçamento não atravessado pelo oracular, não há comunicação em que o equívoco não seja possível.</p><p> </p>

RESUMEN: Analizando el caso uruguayo, Conrado Ramos trata de perfilar el nuevo papel que va a desempeñar un Estado eficiente. Centrándose en un aspecto más concreto de la reforma de la Administración Pública, el autor analiza la relación que se establece entre la nueva burocracia y la élite política, y los apoyos que los diferentes gobiernos dan al proceso de implementación de la reforma.ABSTRACT: Studying the Uruguayan case, Ramos tríes to define the role to be played by an efficient State. In one more concrete aspect of the Administration Reform, the author analyzes the relationship between the new bureaucracy and the political elites, and the supports that the different governments give to the process of implementation reform.

[ES] Analizando el caso uruguayo, Conrado Ramos trata de perfilar el nuevo papel que va a desempeñar un Estado eficiente. Centrándose en un aspecto más concreto de la reforma de la Administración Pública, el autor analiza la relación que se establece entre la nueva burocracia y la élite política, y los apoyos que los diferentes gobiernos dan al proceso de implementación de la reforma. ; [EN] Studying the Uruguayan case, Ramos tríes to define the role to be played by an efficient State. In one more concrete aspect of the Administration Reform, the author analyzes the relationship between the new bureaucracy and the political elites, and the supports that the different governments give to the process of implementation reform.

Dans le présent article, nous tentons de contribuer au développement de la théorie néo-wébérienne de l'administration publique en la situant dans le contexte latino-américain. Nous soutenons que ce modèle de réforme de l'administration publique, identifié dans les États d'Europe continentale, a tendance à être présent dans certains pays d'Amérique latine qui ont suivi des modèles néo-développementaux de développement économique. La stratégie politique néo-wébérienne plaide pour une modernisation du secteur public, qui renforce ses capacités de pilotage et de coordination, ce qui correspond à une vision néo-développementale visant à rétablir le rôle central de l'État dans la conduite de la croissance économique et de la cohésion sociale. Pourtant, le modèle de gestion publique instauré ressemble à un néo-wébérianisme « imparfait » en raison des insuffisances institutionnelles de ces pays et des difficultés à proposer un scénario de réforme clair. Nous proposons de faire ce lien en décodant les grandes lignes du modèle de gestion publique en Uruguay dans le contexte des réformes mises en œuvre par le Frente Amplio . Remarques à l'intention des praticiens Notre article met en avant deux idées fondamentales. Premièrement, que les processus de réforme du secteur public sont généralement liés à d'autres stratégies de développement plus larges et à des calculs de faisabilité politique. Cela peut expliquer dans une certaine mesure les options choisies par les politiques. Deuxièmement, les réformes du secteur public sont souvent une combinaison de plusieurs doctrines administratives, d'où le risque qu'elles soient non systématiques, incohérentes, voire contradictoires.

This article seeks to contribute to the development of the neo-Weberian theory of public administration by making it travel to the Latin American context. We argue that this model of public administration reform, identified in continental European states, tends to be present in some Latin American countries that have followed neodevelopmentalist models of economic development. The neo-Weberian political strategy promotes a public sector modernization that enhances its steering and coordination capacities which is functional to a neodevelopmental view that aims to rebuild the state's central role in leading economic growth and social cohesiveness. Yet, the public management model that is implanted resembles an 'imperfect' neo-Weberianism due to the institutional deficiencies of these countries and the difficulties in providing a clear reform script. We provide this link by decoding the main outlines of the public management model in Uruguay in the context of the reforms implemented by the Frente Amplio.Points for practitionersThe article demonstrates two central points. First, that the processes of public sector reform are usually linked to other broader development strategies and to calculations of political feasibility. This can explain to some extent the options taken by politicians. Second, public sector reforms are often a combination of multiple administrative doctrines. This poses the risk of being unsystematic, incoherent or even contradictory.

While most scholarship on public administration in Latin America has taken an overtly legal approach, this handbook examines the subject from a political and public management perspective. In so doing, this handbook brings the study of public administration in Latin America more in line with studies conducted in other parts of the world, providing a basis for much more fruitful comparison. The handbook is divided into two parts. The first section contains chapters that explore a range of administrative systems in existence across Latin America, including the major representative types of public administration. The second portion of the book presents comparative examinations of important issues relating to public administration across the region, including accountability, public personnel management, policy coordination and the politics of bureaucracy. In providing an in-depth examination of public administration in contemporary Latin America, this handbook is a vital resource for scholars interested in the fields of public administration in both a Latin American and comparative context, as well as practitioners in government.