Suchergebnisse
Filter
17 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Bundesrepublik 3.0: ein Beitrag zur Weiterentwicklung und Stärkung der parlamentarisch-repräsentativen Demokratie durch mehr Partizipation auf Bundesebene : Abschlussbericht
In: Texte 2019,40
Die Studie Bundesrepublik 3.0 leistet einen Beitrag zur Vitalisierung der parlamentarisch-repräsentativen Demokratie, indem sie ein innovatives Konzept für Partizipation auf Bundesebene entwirft. Das Konzept wurde kokreativ in einem generativen Gestaltungsprozess entworfen, inden sowohl praktische Partizipations-und Prozesskompetenz sowie politikwissenschaftliche und verfassungsrechtliche Expertise eingeflossen sind. Das Ergebnis der Studie, ein Konzeptentwurf für wirksame nationale Beteiligungspraxis, beruhtauf einer Gegenüberstellung von (1) offenen Gestaltungsfragen, die sich aus der Analyse von gegenwärtigen gesellschaftspolitischen Herausforderungen, den Schwierigkeiten von nationalstaatlichen Beteiligungsvorhaben und dem potenziellen Wirkvermögen unterschiedlicher Partizipationskonzepten ergeben sowie (2) von Gestaltungsmustern guter Beteiligungspraxis, die auf Grundlage einer Analyse von bestehenden Verfahren und theoretischen Konzepten kommunaler, regionaler und nationalstaatlicher Beteiligung extrahiert und herausarbeitet werden. Das am Ende der Studie entwickelte innovative und praxistaugliche Modell, die Bundesbeteiligungswerkstatt, reagiert auf die beschriebenen Anforderungen – die offenen Gestaltungsfragen – und integriert die aus den Praxisbeispielen abgeleiteten Gestaltungsmuster. Es beinhaltet eine mögliche Einbettung der Bundesbeteiligungswerkstatt ins parlamentarisch-repräsentative System und lässt einen Gesamtverfahrensablauf erkennbar werden.
Bundesrepublik 3.0: a contribution to the development and strengthening of parliamentary-representative democracy through greater participation at federal level : final report
In: Texte 2020, 57
In: Ressortforschungsplan des Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit
Die Studie Bundesrepublik 3.0 leistet einen Beitrag zur Vitalisierung der parlamentarisch-repräsentativen Demokratie, indem sie ein innovatives Konzept für Partizipation auf Bundesebene entwirft. Das Konzept wurde kokreativ in einem generativen Gestaltungsprozess entworfen, in den sowohl praktische Partizipations- und Prozesskompetenz sowie politikwissenschaftliche und verfassungsrechtliche Expertise eingeflossen sind. Das Ergebnis der Studie, ein Konzeptentwurf für wirksame nationale Beteiligungspraxis, beruht auf einer Gegenüberstellung von (1) offenen Gestaltungsfragen, die sich aus der Analyse von gegenwärtigen gesellschaftspolitischen Herausforderungen, den Schwierigkeiten von national-staatlichen Beteiligungsvorhaben und dem potenziellen Wirkvermögen unterschiedlicher Partizipationskonzepten ergeben sowie (2) von Gestaltungsmustern guter Beteiligungspraxis, die auf Grundlage einer Analyse von bestehenden Verfahren und theoretischen Konzepten kommunaler, regionaler und nationalstaatlicher Beteiligung extrahiert und herausarbeitet werden. Das am Ende der Studie entwickelte innovative und praxistaugliche Modell, die Bundesbeteiligungswerkstatt, reagiert auf die beschriebenen Anforderungen - die offenen Gestaltungsfragen - und integriert die aus den Praxisbeispielen abgeleiteten Gestaltungsmuster. Es beinhaltet eine mögliche Einbettung der Bundesbeteiligungswerkstatt ins parlamentarisch-repräsentative System und lässt einen Gesamtverfahrensablauf erkennbar werden.
A modern administration is a prerequisite for Germany's future viability and democracy
Germany is facing enormous challenges: The climate crisis and the destruction of ecosystems, the Covid-19 pandemic, and rapid demographic and technological change cannot be adequately addressed in Germany's traditional administrative structures. Instead, a fundamental cultural change is needed in the public administration in order to be able to lead Germany more quickly, anticipatorily and effectively through the next decades of transformation. This includes, in particular, a new self-conception of the administration as well as agile processes, state-of-the-art competencies, a horizontal and vertical opening of the state, serious public participation and transparency, institutionalised cooperation with civil society, science as well as business, and bottom-up federalism among other points. For us co-authors, the modernisation of public administration has become a question of the future viability of our country and our democracy. It is not just a matter of overcoming challenges, crises and a digital and socio-ecological transformation, but also of being able to organise our democratic community well, preserve it and develop it further in the coming decades. In this paper, we have contributed our many years of professional experience in administration, academia, science and transformation and innovation projects. We are united in our belief of a modern and effective administration as a prerequisite for a strong democracy. We are committed to putting cultural change and the modernisation of the administration on the agenda as a central goal for the new legislative period. In the work of the coming government, the question of HOW the agreed political agenda can be implemented effectively and quickly must have as much importance as the question of content. Here, our proposal refers in particular to the federal level, in order to influence from there other political-administrative levels (federal states, municipalities) as well as other areas of the public sector.
BASE
Pour une administration publique moderne en Allemagne : le pilier négligé d'un avenir démocratique et durable
L'Allemagne est confrontée à d'énormes défis : les structures traditionnelles de l'administration ne peuvent plus traiter de manière adéquate la crise climatique et la destruction des écosystèmes, la pandémie du Covid-19 et l'évolution démographique et technologique rapides. Une transition culturelle fondamentale est nécessaire au sein de l'administration publique, afin de pouvoir diriger l'Allemagne à travers les transformations en cours et à venir dans les prochaines décennies de manière plus efficace, plus rapide et plus adaptée. Cette transition culturelle implique une redéfinition par l'administration publique de ses missions et de son rôle, des principes de fonctionnement plus agiles, des compétences plus modernes, une ouverture horizontale et verticale de l'État, un engagement sérieux pour la participation citoyenne et la transparence, une coopération institutionnalisée avec la société civile, la science et les entreprises, un fédéralisme structuré du bas vers le haut - et bien plus encore. Pour nous, les co-auteur.ice.s, la modernisation de l'administration publique est devenue une question de viabilité de notre pays et de notre démocratie. Il ne s'agit pas seulement de faire face aux défis, aux crises, et aux effets profonds de la transformation numérique et socio-écologique, mais aussi d'être en mesure d'organiser, de préserver et de développer davantage notre communauté démocratique dans les décennies à venir. Dans ce document, nous avons rassemblé notre longue expérience professionnelle de l'administration, de la science, ainsi que des projets de transformation et d'innovation. Nous sommes unis par notre conviction qu'une administration moderne et efficace est une condition préalable pour préserver une démocratie solide. Nous nous engageons à inscrire la modernisation et la transition culturelle de l'administration au coeur de l'agenda politique de la nouvelle période législative. Dans le travail du gouvernement à venir, la question du « COMMENT » mettre en oeuvre rapidement et efficacement le ...
BASE
Eine moderne Verwaltung ist Voraussetzung für Deutschlands Zukunftsfähigkeit und Demokratie - Acht Handlungsfelder für die nächste Bundesregierung
Deutschland steht vor gewaltigen Herausforderungen: Klimakrise und Zerstörung der Ökosysteme, die Covid-19 Pandemie und der rasante demographische und technologische Wandel lassen sich in den tradierten Verwaltungsstrukturen nicht mehr angemessen adressieren. Es bedarf eines grundlegenden Kulturwandels in der öffentlichen Verwaltung, um Deutschland schneller, antizipativer und effektiver durch die nächsten Jahrzehnte der Transformationen führen zu können. Dazu gehören ein neues Selbstverständnis sowie entsprechende agile Prozesse, zeitgemäße Kompetenzen, eine horizontale und vertikale Öffnung des Staates, ernst gemeinte Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung und Transparenz, institutionalisierte Zusammenarbeit mit der Zivilgesellschaft, Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft, bottom-up Föderalismus – und vieles mehr. Für uns Co-Autor:innen ist die Modernisierung der öffentlichen Verwaltung zu einer Frage der Zukunftsfähigkeit unseres Landes und unserer Demokratie geworden. Es geht nicht allein um die Bewältigung von Herausforderungen, Krisen und eine bis in die Tiefe wirkende digitale und sozial-ökologische Transformation, sondern auch darum, unser demokratisches Gemeinwesen in den nächsten Jahrzehnten gut organisieren, bewahren und zeitgemäß weiterentwickeln zu können. Wir haben in diesem Papier unsere langjährige fachliche Erfahrung aus der Verwaltung, aus der Wissenschaft und aus Transformations- und Innovationsprojekten eingebracht. Uns eint der Glaube an eine zeitgemäße und effektive Verwaltung als Voraussetzung einer starken Demokratie. Wir setzen uns dafür ein, den Kulturwandel und die Modernisierung der Verwaltung als zentrales Ziel für die neue Legislaturperiode auf die Agenda zu setzen. In der kommenden Regierungsarbeit muss die Frage, WIE die vereinbarte politische Agenda wirksam und schnell umgesetzt werden kann, genauso viel Bedeutung haben, wie die Frage nach den Inhalten. Mit Blick hierauf beziehen sich unsere Vorschläge insbesondere auf die Bundesebene, um von dort auch auf die anderen politisch-administrativen Ebenen ...
BASE
Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: Visions of future systems and how to get there
Formalised knowledge systems, including universities and research institutes, are important for contemporary societies. They are, however, also arguably failing humanity when their impact is measured against the level of progress being made in stimulating the societal changes needed to address challenges like climate change. In this research we used a novel futures-oriented and participatory approach that asked what future envisioned knowledge systems might need to look like and how we might get there. Findings suggest that envisioned future systems will need to be much more collaborative, open, diverse, egalitarian, and able to work with values and systemic issues. They will also need to go beyond producing knowledge about our world to generating wisdom about how to act within it. To get to envisioned systems we will need to rapidly scale methodological innovations, connect innovators, and creatively accelerate learning about working with intractable challenges. We will also need to create new funding schemes, a global knowledge commons, and challenge deeply held assumptions. To genuinely be a creative force in supporting longevity of human and non-human life on our planet, the shift in knowledge systems will probably need to be at the scale of the enlightenment and speed of the scientific and technological revolution accompanying the second World War. This will require bold and strategic action from governments, scientists, civic society and sustained transformational intent. ; publishedVersion
BASE
Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth : Visions of future systems and how to get there
Formalised knowledge systems, including universities and research institutes, are important for contemporary societies. They are, however, also arguably failing humanity when their impact is measured against the level of progress being made in stimulating the societal changes needed to address challenges like climate change. In this research we used a novel futures-oriented and participatory approach that asked what future envisioned knowledge systems might need to look like and how we might get there. Findings suggest that envisioned future systems will need to be much more collaborative, open, diverse, egalitarian, and able to work with values and systemic issues. They will also need to go beyond producing knowledge about our world to generating wisdom about how to act within it. To get to envisioned systems we will need to rapidly scale methodological innovations, connect innovators, and creatively accelerate learning about working with intractable challenges. We will also need to create new funding schemes, a global knowledge commons, and challenge deeply held assumptions. To genuinely be a creative force in supporting longevity of human and non-human life on our planet, the shift in knowledge systems will probably need to be at the scale of the enlightenment and speed of the scientific and technological revolution accompanying the second World War. This will require bold and strategic action from governments, scientists, civic society and sustained transformational intent.
BASE
Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth : Visions of future systems and how to get there
Formalised knowledge systems, including universities and research institutes, are important for contemporary societies. They are, however, also arguably failing humanity when their impact is measured against the level of progress being made in stimulating the societal changes needed to address challenges like climate change. In this research we used a novel futures-oriented and participatory approach that asked what future envisioned knowledge systems might need to look like and how we might get there. Findings suggest that envisioned future systems will need to be much more collaborative, open, diverse, egalitarian, and able to work with values and systemic issues. They will also need to go beyond producing knowledge about our world to generating wisdom about how to act within it. To get to envisioned systems we will need to rapidly scale methodological innovations, connect innovators, and creatively accelerate learning about working with intractable challenges. We will also need to create new funding schemes, a global knowledge commons, and challenge deeply held assumptions. To genuinely be a creative force in supporting longevity of human and non-human life on our planet, the shift in knowledge systems will probably need to be at the scale of the enlightenment and speed of the scientific and technological revolution accompanying the second World War. This will require bold and strategic action from governments, scientists, civic society and sustained transformational intent.
BASE
Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth: Visions of future systems and how to get there
Formalised knowledge systems, including universities and research institutes, are important for contemporary societies. They are, however, also arguably failing humanity when their impact is measured against the level of progress being made in stimulating the societal changes needed to address challenges like climate change. In this research we used a novel futures-oriented and participatory approach that asked what future envisioned knowledge systems might need to look like and how we might get there. Findings suggest that envisioned future systems will need to be much more collaborative, open, diverse, egalitarian, and able to work with values and systemic issues. They will also need to go beyond producing knowledge about our world to generating wisdom about how to act within it. To get to envisioned systems we will need to rapidly scale methodological innova-tions, connect innovators, and creatively accelerate learning about working with intractable challenges. We will also need to create new funding schemes, a global knowledge commons, and challenge deeply held assumptions. To genuinely be a creative force in supporting longevity of human and non-human life on our planet, the shift in knowledge systems will probably need to be at the scale of the enlightenment and speed of the scientific and technological revolution accompanying the second World War. This will require bold and strategic action from governments, scientists, civic society and sustained transformational intent.
BASE
Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth : visions of future systems and how to get there
Formalised knowledge systems, including universities and research institutes, are important for contemporary societies. They are, however, also arguably failing humanity when their impact is measured against the level of progress being made in stimulating the societal changes needed to address challenges like climate change. In this research we used a novel futures-oriented and participatory approach that asked what future envisioned knowledge systems might need to look like and how we might get there. Findings suggest that envisioned future systems will need to be much more collaborative, open, diverse, egalitarian, and able to work with values and systemic issues. They will also need to go beyond producing knowledge about our world to generating wisdom about how to act within it. To get to envisioned systems we will need to rapidly scale methodological innovations, connect innovators, and creatively accelerate learning about working with intractable challenges. We will also need to create new funding schemes, a global knowledge commons, and challenge deeply held assumptions. To genuinely be a creative force in supporting longevity of human and non-human life on our planet, the shift in knowledge systems will probably need to be at the scale of the enlightenment and speed of the scientific and technological revolution accompanying the second World War. This will require bold and strategic action from governments, scientists, civic society and sustained transformational intent. ; Publisher PDF ; Peer reviewed
BASE
Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth : Visions of future systems and how to get there
Formalised knowledge systems, including universities and research institutes, are important for contemporary societies. They are, however, also arguably failing humanity when their impact is measured against the level of progress being made in stimulating the societal changes needed to address challenges like climate change. In this research we used a novel futures-oriented and participatory approach that asked what future envisioned knowledge systems might need to look like and how we might get there. Findings suggest that envisioned future systems will need to be much more collaborative, open, diverse, egalitarian, and able to work with values and systemic issues. They will also need to go beyond producing knowledge about our world to generating wisdom about how to act within it. To get to envisioned systems we will need to rapidly scale methodological innovations, connect innovators, and creatively accelerate learning about working with intractable challenges. We will also need to create new funding schemes, a global knowledge commons, and challenge deeply held assumptions. To genuinely be a creative force in supporting longevity of human and non-human life on our planet, the shift in knowledge systems will probably need to be at the scale of the enlightenment and speed of the scientific and technological revolution accompanying the second World War. This will require bold and strategic action from governments, scientists, civic society and sustained transformational intent.
BASE
Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth : Visions of future systems and how to get there
Formalised knowledge systems, including universities and research institutes, are important for contemporary societies. They are, however, also arguably failing humanity when their impact is measured against the level of progress being made in stimulating the societal changes needed to address challenges like climate change. In this research we used a novel futures-oriented and participatory approach that asked what future envisioned knowledge systems might need to look like and how we might get there. Findings suggest that envisioned future systems will need to be much more collaborative, open, diverse, egalitarian, and able to work with values and systemic issues. They will also need to go beyond producing knowledge about our world to generating wisdom about how to act within it. To get to envisioned systems we will need to rapidly scale methodological innovations, connect innovators, and creatively accelerate learning about working with intractable challenges. We will also need to create new funding schemes, a global knowledge commons, and challenge deeply held assumptions. To genuinely be a creative force in supporting longevity of human and non-human life on our planet, the shift in knowledge systems will probably need to be at the scale of the enlightenment and speed of the scientific and technological revolution accompanying the second World War. This will require bold and strategic action from governments, scientists, civic society and sustained transformational intent. ; Peer reviewed
BASE
Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth:Visions of future systems and how to get there
In: Fazey , I , Schäpke , N , Caniglia , G , Hodgson , A , Kendrick , I , Lyon , C , Page , G , Patterson , J , Riedy , C , Strasser , T , Verveen , S , Adams , D , Goldstein , B , Klaes , M , Leicester , G , Linyard , A , McCurdy , A , Ryan , P , Sharpe , B , Silvestri , G , Abdurrahim , A Y , Abson , D , Adetunji , O S , Aldunce , P , Alvarez-Pereira , C , Amparo , J M , Amundsen , H , Anderson , L , Andersson , L , Asquith , M , Augenstein , K , Barrie , J , Bent , D , Bentz , J , Bergsten , A , Berzonsky , C , Bina , O , Blackstock , K , Boehnert , J , Bradbury , H , Brand , C , Böhme (born Sangmeister) , J , Bøjer , M M , Carmen , E , Charli-Joseph , L , Choudhury , S , Chunhachoti-ananta , S , Cockburn , J , Colvin , J , Connon , I L C , Cornforth , R , Cox , R S , Cradock-Henry , N , Cramer , L , Cremaschi , A , Dannevig , H , Day , C T , de Lima Hutchison , C , de Vrieze , A , Desai , V , Dolley , J , Duckett , D , Durrant , R A , Egermann , M , Elsner (Adams) , E , Fremantle , C , Fullwood-Thomas , J , Galafassi , D , Gobby , J , Golland , A , González-Padrón , S K , Gram-Hanssen , I , Grandin , J , Grenni , S , Lauren Gunnell , J , Gusmao , F , Hamann , M , Harding , B , Harper , G , Hesselgren , M , Hestad , D , Heykoop , C A , Holmén , J , Holstead , K , Hoolohan , C , Horcea-Milcu , A I , Horlings , L G , Howden , S M , Howell , R A , Huque , S I , Inturias Canedo , M L , Iro , C Y , Ives , C D , John , B , Joshi , R , Juarez-Bourke , S , Juma , D W , Karlsen , B C , Kliem , L , Kläy , A , Kuenkel , P , Kunze , I , Lam , D P M , Lang , D J , Larkin , A , Light , A , Luederitz , C , Luthe , T , Maguire , C , Mahecha-Groot , A M , Malcolm , J , Marshall , F , Maru , Y , McLachlan , C , Mmbando , P , Mohapatra , S , Moore , M L , Moriggi , A , Morley-Fletcher , M , Moser , S , Mueller , K M , Mukute , M , Mühlemeier , S , Naess , L O , Nieto-Romero , M , Novo , P , ÓBrien , K , O'Connell , D A , O'Donnell , K , Olsson , P , Pearson , K R , Pereira , L , Petridis , P , Peukert , D , Phear , N , Pisters , S R , Polsky , M , Pound , D , Preiser , R , Rahman , M S , Reed , M S , Revell , P , Rodriguez , I , Rogers , B C , Rohr , J , Nordbø Rosenberg , M , Ross , H , Russell , S , Ryan , M , Saha , P , Schleicher , K , Schneider , F , Scoville-Simonds , M , Searle , B , Sebhatu , S P , Sesana , E , Silverman , H , Singh , C , Sterling , E , Stewart , S J , Tàbara , J D , Taylor , D , Thornton , P , Tribaldos , T M , Tschakert , P , Uribe-Calvo , N , Waddell , S , Waddock , S , van der Merwe , L , van Mierlo , B , van Zwanenberg , P , Velarde , S J , Washbourne , C L , Waylen , K , Weiser , A , Wight , I , Williams , S , Woods , M , Wolstenholme , R , Wright , N , Wunder , S , Wyllie , A & Young , H R 2020 , ' Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth : Visions of future systems and how to get there ' , Energy Research and Social Science , vol. 70 , 101724 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101724
Formalised knowledge systems, including universities and research institutes, are important for contemporary societies. They are, however, also arguably failing humanity when their impact is measured against the level of progress being made in stimulating the societal changes needed to address challenges like climate change. In this research we used a novel futures-oriented and participatory approach that asked what future envisioned knowledge systems might need to look like and how we might get there. Findings suggest that envisioned future systems will need to be much more collaborative, open, diverse, egalitarian, and able to work with values and systemic issues. They will also need to go beyond producing knowledge about our world to generating wisdom about how to act within it. To get to envisioned systems we will need to rapidly scale methodological innovations, connect innovators, and creatively accelerate learning about working with intractable challenges. We will also need to create new funding schemes, a global knowledge commons, and challenge deeply held assumptions. To genuinely be a creative force in supporting longevity of human and non-human life on our planet, the shift in knowledge systems will probably need to be at the scale of the enlightenment and speed of the scientific and technological revolution accompanying the second World War. This will require bold and strategic action from governments, scientists, civic society and sustained transformational intent.
BASE