Suchergebnisse

This book presents wide-ranging video research in pedagogical contexts that have previously received little notice. Video research is, and can be employed for, so much more that standing in a classroom and filming with a camera. That is what we hope to achieve with this book – to demonstrate the inherent flexibility in video, that it can serve as one tool among many and be utilized in a variety of settings in several different ways. We want to emphasize the fact that you don't need a professional lab with lots of equipment to do quality video research. All you need is a camera, a microphone, and a good plan for what you can, and cannot, capture in your project.

Video Research in Educational Settings: Diverse Video Data in Pedagogical Research and Development is written primarily for other researchers, including those who are just beginning their research activities (such as master students and PhD candidates) and are interested in discovering how flexible, applicable and creative data collection can be with the help of video, and how rich the data material one obtains can be. The chapters represent a broad cross-disciplinary approach, yet with one common denominator: the use of video in different educational arenas, not only for data collection, but also for stimulating reflection, learning and greater expertise. - Denne boken presenterer en bredde i videoforskning innen pedagogiske kontekster som tidligere ikke har fått så stor oppmerksomhet. Med andre ord, videoforskning er, og kan brukes til, så mye mer enn å bare stå i et klasserom og filme med et kamera. Det er det vi ønsker å gjøre med denne boka – vise fleksibiliteten i bruk av video og hvordan video er ett verktøy blant mange, men som kan brukes til flere ulike problemstillinger og på flere ulike måter. Vi ønsker å løfte frem det aspektet at du ikke trenger en stor videolabb med en masse utstyr for å få til god videoforskning. Du klarer deg med et kamera, en mikrofon og en god plan for hva du kan og ikke kan fange opp i ditt prosjekt.

Videoforskning på ulike læringsarenaer: Mangfoldig videodata i pedagogisk forskning og utvikling er primært for andre forskere, men også andre som er på vei inn i forskningsaktivitet, eksempelvis masterstudenter eller ph.d.-kandidater som er interessert i å oppdage hvor fleksibel, brukbar og kreativ datainnsamling med hjelp av video kan være, og hvor rikt datamateriale man kan skaffe seg. Boka presenterer en bred tverrfaglighet, men som uansett har en felles nevner: bruk av video på forskjellige læringsarenaer, både for å samle inn data til forskning og for å stimulere til refleksjon, læring i utdanning eller kompetanseutvikling.

The interest in studying multiplayer video game play has been growing since the mid-2000s. This is in part due to growing interest in games that are part of eSports settings such as Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS:GO), which is one of the main games within eSports, and is the video game that is studied in this paper. Studies of multiplayer video game play from a conversation analysis (CA) participant perspective appear to be scarce, although they are steadily becoming a legitimate topic in ethnomethodological conversation analytical (EMCA) studies. EMCA studies have mostly focused on aspects around the screen, and on how physically present players interact and draw upon resources both on- and off-screen. Some studies have taken the CA perspective further and blur the on-/off-screen dichotomy to better understand on-screen actions as social actions worthy of study. The aim of this article is to describe and gain new understanding of how participants socially organize their game play with a focus on sequentiality and accountability connected to "kills" (K) and "deaths" (D) in CS:GO. The social organizational structure of game play connected to K- and D-events in CS:GO can be described as a set of "rules" that participants orient to. In short, these rules appear to encompass communication efficiency: K-events are more often other-topicalized, and D-events are more often self-topicalized; spectating provides more sequential and temporal space for topicalization; and D-events are oriented to as more problematic events in need of further negotiation. In-and-through describing the social organization connected to K- and D-events from a participant's perspective, it becomes evident that "killing" and "dying" in-game is not oriented to in a literal fashion. They are oriented to as frequent events that are basic parts of the game's mechanics and of playing the game to win or lose.

The aim of this article is to shed light on how the democratic ideal of institutionalised Nordic popular education is realised through an ethnographic field study in an English as a foreign language study circle. The study focuses on how participants express their citizenship when taking part in the study circle. Citizenship is viewed as a dynamic concept comprising the aspects of 'being' and 'acting' and constructed in and through social interaction. The study circle is arranged as a classroom practice: The study circle leader organises the activities, while the participants engage in exercises and attempt to learn correct usage. Through their participation, the participants take individual responsibility for what they see as their lack of sufficient knowledge of English. The participants describe their participation as a personal and voluntary investment in themselves. In light of the study, the individual stance is discussed as limiting possibilities for responsibility and thus expressions of citizenship. (DIPF/Orig.)

The aim of this article is to shed light on how the democratic ideal of institutionalised Nordic popular education is realised through an ethnographic field study in an English as a foreign language study circle. The study focuses on how participants express their citizenship when taking part in the study circle. Citizenship is viewed as a dynamic concept comprising the aspects of 'being' and 'acting' and constructed in and through social interaction. The study circle is arranged as a classroom practice: The study circle leader organises the activities, while the participants engage in exercises and attempt to learn correct usage. Through their participation, the participants take individual responsibility for what they see as their lack of sufficient knowledge of English. The participants describe their participation as a personal and voluntary investment in themselves. In light of the study, the individual stance is discussed as limiting possibilities for responsibility and thus expressions of citizenship.

The aim of this article is to shed light on how the democratic ideal of institutionalised Nordic popular education is realised through an ethnographic field study in an English as a foreign language study circle. The study focuses on how participants express their citizenship when taking part in the study circle. Citizenship is viewed as a dynamic concept comprising the aspects of 'being' and 'acting' and constructed in and through social interaction. The study circle is arranged as a classroom practice: The study circle leader organises the activities, while the participants engage in exercises and attempt to learn correct usage. Through their participation, the participants take individual responsibility for what they see as their lack of sufficient knowledge of English. The participants describe their participation as a personal and voluntary investment in themselves. In light of the study, the individual stance is discussed as limiting possibilities for responsibility and thus expressions of citizenship. ; publishedVersion