Suchergebnisse

The article deals with the problem of language in the press of the Russophile movement, which has been gaining anti-Ukrainian character since the beginning of the 20th century. Particular attention is paid to the actual concepts that are currently actively used by Russian propaganda. The notion of language moves from the plane of communication to the plane of political expediency and the unifying factor with Russia. The purpose of the article is to find out the main ideological and thematic determinants of the language problem in the press of the Russophile movement in Eastern Galicia at the beg. of the XX cent. The task of this work is to point out the structural key points that actualize this problem; to study the features of the presentation of the speech topic in the Russophile press; to highlight the journalistic discourse around this topic of those who did not perceive the ideas of Russophile movement. Research methods – problematic and thematic method applied at all stages of the study; the historical method of research gives us an opportunity to show the historical precondition of the publications and works of the ideologues of the Muscophile movement and their opponents on the language problem; bibliographic-descriptive method used at the stage of the choice of editions that we studied in the context of studying the language problem; comparative-analytical test for the study of the ideological and conceptual foundations of the Russophile press, which concerned language problems.The problem of this research has a deep modern undertone, because attention is paid to such fundamental ideas, which today are actively cultivated by Russian propaganda, that today are actively cultivated by Russian propaganda – the basic guarantee of the «russian people» trinity is the Russian language; the presence of the Russian language on the communicative map of Eastern Galicia will mean the presence of «Russians» here; the denial of the Ukrainian language existence legalizes the idea of the Russian language as a general Slavic, and others.Key words: Russophile press, language problem, anti-Ukrainian politics. ; У статті досліджено проблему мови у пресі москвофільського руху, який вже від початку ХХ століття набирав антиукраїнського характеру. Особливу увагу звернено на актуальні концепти, які сьогодні активно використовує російська пропаганда. Поняття мови виноситься із площини комунікації у площину політичної доцільності та об'єднувального фактора із Росією.Ключові слова: москвофільська преса, проблема мови, антиукраїнська політика.

The main idea of this article is the fact that Russophile movement was losing its influence in public-political life of Galicia at the beginning of 20th century after World War I; however it was still financed by Moscow. In postwar Galicia Russophile camp split and it significantly influenced the functioning of the press of this movement. Russophile organizations undergo a split, thereby dividing the press. After war the Russian Revolutionary Committee, headed by V. Kurilovich and D. Markov, became the center of the revived Russophile movement in Lviv in 1918. The same Committee published the newspaper «Prykarpatskaya Rus'». In its national positions and political orientations, the newspaper advocated unification with Russia, however, the newspaper was banned for its anti-Polish policy. Instead, the newspaper «Rus'» begins its publishing under the changed name. In 1922, as a continuation of the newspaper «Rus'», a daily newspaper «Zhyzn'» is published (it was published by the Galician-Russian Organization), which took over the policy of «Prykarpatskaya Rus» after its prohibition.The article deals with the question of the split in the Russophile environment and refers to the features of the transformation of the press of this political group. Due to internal contradictions and different-sided views on future orientation, the Russian Executive Committee of 1923 splits up and sets up two camps: left party of Muscovites – «Narodnaya Volya» («People's Will») and right one – Russkaya Narodnaya Organizatsiya (Russian People's Organization). Since 1922, the year before the official split, the same organization began publishing the newspaper «Russkiy Golos» («Russian Gaul»). The editorial office declared itself as an independent political and economic newspaper. The main focus was the dependence on the «Russian idea», which they were very clearly separated from the ideas of communism, which they were called to fight with, as the greatest international misfortune.The main feature of this press is the denial of the existence of Ukrainian language, literature, history, state and the right to self-determination in relation to its future. Traditional Russophile movement saw the future of the Galician Rusyns in unity with Moscow. The strength of the Russophiles weakened on the political arena of Galicia, so their attitude toward Ukrainians became more aggressive and anti-Ukrainian.Key words: Russophiles press, Russian idea, Ukrainian state, Ukrainian language, anti-Ukrainian position. ; У статті розглянуто особливості формування ідейних засад преси традиційного москвофільства після Першої світової війни, вказано на проблематику цієї преси у контексті трансформації москвофільського руху як суспільно-політичного явища.Ключові слова: москвофільська преса, ідея «единой Руси», українська державність, українська мова, антиукраїнська позиція.

In this article are analyzed the main ideological and political determinants of Russophile discourse of 20th cent. It is also taken into consideration the main aspects of this communicational process: the problem of language, history, national identity, culture, church and religious life. It is discovered the main programmatic and ideological documents, which was used by Russophile editions.Key words: press, language, history, communication, ideologemes. ; У статті проаналізовано основні ідеологічні та політичні детермінанти москвофіль-ського дискурсу початку ХХ століття. Взято до уваги основні аспекти цього комунікатив-ного процесу: проблема мови, питання історії, національна ідентичність, церковно-релі-гійне життя та питання культури. Виявлено основні програмні документи та ідеологеми, якими послуговувалися москвофільські видання.Ключові слова: преса, мова, історія, комунікація, ідеологеми.