Suchergebnisse

This book combines urban planning and architectural tools in an attempt to overcome the limitations of sectoral measures. In this perspective, it offers a forum for the debate of different approaches used by schools of planning and architecture. It explores strategies by drawing from the potential contributions of cognitive models for decisions, the role of utopian thinking and retrofitting actions and their interconnectedness, the role of cultural legacy for urban and landscape design, the design perspectives about public spaces, and the role of architecture design and urban and regional planning for landscape quality. The book also discusses on design as a process of decision-making that operates as an act of empathy that aligns with human and ecological values - emotional, physical and socio-cultural. Each planning and design act has different possible effects able to help making clear strategic and local actions, contributing to community empowerment and to landscape and local governance. Design activity along the river and multiple experiences (design processes, urban fringe design, agri-urban models, river parks, UNESCO sites, River Contracts, greenbelts and ecological networks), through reflection on design roles, helping to understand the design process and its results at different scales. Roberta Ingaramo, architect, PhD, is Assistant Professor in Architectural and Urban Design, Department of Architecture and Design (DAD), Polytechnic University of Turin (Italy), Master in Conservation of Historic Towns and Buildings, Katholieke Universiteit (Belgium). roberta.ingaramo@polito.it Angioletta Voghera, architect, PhD, is Associate Professor of Urban and Regional Planning, Inter-university Department of Urban and Regional Studies and Planning (DIST), Polytechnic University of Turin (Italy). angioletta.voghera@polito.it.

"This book explores in a systematic way the themes of big data and the spatial analysis, with theoretical and operative recommendations for urban planning. It also brings together different work methodologies that combine the potential of large data analysis with GIS applications in dedicated tools specifically for sectoral, territorial, environmental, transport, energy, real estate and landscape assessment"--

This open access book builds a framework that holds together numerous open issues in territorial planning: from the understanding of territorial, landscape, environmental and climatic dynamics to the analysis of local vulnerabilities, to the use of modern survey techniques to support planning. What is the role of urban and regional planning in achieving the sustainable development goals of our communities considering the major issues posed by the COVID-19 pandemic in urban planning? And how do these medium- and long-term objectives interact with the needs that the emergency has given rise to? Post Un-Lock—from territorial vulnerabilities to local resilience—aims to provide the reader with a useful key to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic can be seen as a catalyst for a restart based on the concepts of sustainability and resilience. In fact, the COVID-19 experience evidences the need to propose a planning system able to integrate multiple scales according to an interdisciplinary approach focused on in-depth knowledge of the territorial risks and vulnerabilities. Besides, with the contribution of the new technologies, it is able to rethink spaces on a neighbourhood scale, conceived as a "local resilience unit" that ensures the population high standards of safety, liveability, and accessibility to proximity services. In this view, planning is increasingly concerned about social aspects and the well-being of communities, supported by indicators and evaluation tools. With the proposal of the concept of local resilience unit, Post Un-Lock takes a step forward towards the definition of a new paradigm of local planning and a topic for urban regeneration.

Part 1: The research -- Post-pandemic challenges. The role of local governance for territorial resilience -- Part 2: Topics -- Notes of spatial implications of Covid-19. Evidence from Piedmont Region, Italy -- The role of the minor hydrographic system in increasing the ecological network -- Ecosystem services and territorial resilience: The role of green and blue infrastructure -- Indicators and scenarios for sustainable development at the local level -- Towards neighborhoods as minimum units of resilience?- Part 3: Case studies -- NO2 concentrations and Covid-19 in local systems of North-West Italy -- The COVID-19 effects and the development process of Lanzo Valleys in a metro-mountain perspective -- Analysis of hydrogeological risks related to climate change: Testing the ClimeApp assessment tool on the Torino Nord Homogenous Zone -- From knowledge to land-use planning: Local resilient experience in the territory of the municipality of Mappano -- Space for rights. The school between urban standards and social innovation -- Part 4: Digital tools -- The 3D metric survey for the digital cartographic production to support the knowledge of the new Municipality of Mappano -- Sources and data for the analysis of the metropolitan territory with GIS tools -- Part 5: Lesson learned and perspectives -- Final remarks on the implementation of the post-pandemic city and the role of technology.

National audience ; While in France, the law «portant Engagement National pour l'Environnement» (2010) has legally recognized the tool of Trame verte et bleue, in Italy, the "reti ecologiche" has not yet been the subject of any national legislation. Whereas the French regional planning experiments (Schéma régional de cohérence écologique) are carried out within a framework defined by the Environmental and Urban Planning Codes, in Italy, Regions have experimented some first attempts. These attempts are diversified: some have opted for a normative or design approach to ecological networks, while others have used landscape planning (related to the application of the 2004 «Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio» to preserve or restore ecological connectivity. The article focuses on two case studies, the French and Italian one, with an emphasis on regional experiences on the one hand (Piedmont and Auvergne Rhône-Alpes), and on their translation into supra-local and local planning (Provincial Coordination Territorial Plan and Regulatory Plan in Italy, Territorial Coherence Scheme and Local Urban Plan in France) on the other hand. ; Si en France, la loi portant Engagement National pour l'Environnement (2010) a reconnu juridiquement la Trame Verte et Bleue, en Italie le « reti ecologiche » ne font l'objet d'aucune transcription dans la législation nationale. Alors que les expériences françaises de planification régionale (Schéma de cohérence écologique) sont conduites dans un cadre défini par les Codes de l'environnement et de l'urbanisme, en Italie, les Régions ont mené de manière plus libre des expérimentations, certaines faisant le choix d'une approche normative ou projectuelle des réseaux écologiques, alors que d'autres ont utilisé la planification paysagère (liée à l'application du « Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio » de 2004) pour préserver ou restaurer une connectivité écologique. L'article s'attache à mettre en perspective les deux cas français et italien, en mettant l'accent sur les expériences ...

National audience ; While in France, the law «portant Engagement National pour l'Environnement» (2010) has legally recognized the tool of Trame verte et bleue, in Italy, the "reti ecologiche" has not yet been the subject of any national legislation. Whereas the French regional planning experiments (Schéma régional de cohérence écologique) are carried out within a framework defined by the Environmental and Urban Planning Codes, in Italy, Regions have experimented some first attempts. These attempts are diversified: some have opted for a normative or design approach to ecological networks, while others have used landscape planning (related to the application of the 2004 «Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio» to preserve or restore ecological connectivity. The article focuses on two case studies, the French and Italian one, with an emphasis on regional experiences on the one hand (Piedmont and Auvergne Rhône-Alpes), and on their translation into supra-local and local planning (Provincial Coordination Territorial Plan and Regulatory Plan in Italy, Territorial Coherence Scheme and Local Urban Plan in France) on the other hand. ; Si en France, la loi portant Engagement National pour l'Environnement (2010) a reconnu juridiquement la Trame Verte et Bleue, en Italie le « reti ecologiche » ne font l'objet d'aucune transcription dans la législation nationale. Alors que les expériences françaises de planification régionale (Schéma de cohérence écologique) sont conduites dans un cadre défini par les Codes de l'environnement et de l'urbanisme, en Italie, les Régions ont mené de manière plus libre des expérimentations, certaines faisant le choix d'une approche normative ou projectuelle des réseaux écologiques, alors que d'autres ont utilisé la planification paysagère (liée à l'application du « Codice dei Beni Culturali e del Paesaggio » de 2004) pour préserver ou restaurer une connectivité écologique. L'article s'attache à mettre en perspective les deux cas français et italien, en mettant l'accent sur les expériences régionales d'une part (Piémont et Auvergne Rhône-Alpes), sur leur traduction dans la planification locale (Plan de coordination et Plan régulateur en Italie, Schéma de cohérence territoriale et Plan local d'urbanisme en France) de l'autre.

In the majority of European regions, territorial inequalities between main urban nodes and marginal territories are raising concerns and pose serious development challenges. Phenomena such as ageing, depopulation and impoverishment of inner areas, and the polarization of social, economic and cultural opportunities in urban areas are often the result of place-neutral, spatially-blind approaches and hinder the European objective of social, economic and territorial cohesion. Since a decade, the European Union is pushing towards more place-based approaches to development in order to face these challenges. The experiences of the River Agreements and the National Strategy for Inner Areas are relevant examples of the Italian take on the EU place-based logics, combining bottom-up and top-down logic within multilevel, multiactor and multifund context-sensitive processes. This contribution discusses the main features, potentials and limitations of the two approaches, aiming to contribute to the debate and policies for the sustainable reactivation of marginal areas and rebalance of territorial inequalities.