Political-Administrative Relations in Collaborative Environmental Management
In: International journal of public administration: IJPA, Band 34, Heft 7, S. 424-436
ISSN: 0190-0692
121 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International journal of public administration: IJPA, Band 34, Heft 7, S. 424-436
ISSN: 0190-0692
Dedication -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- About the Contributors -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- Chapter 1: Introduction -- Advocacy Coalition Framework -- Policy Subsystems -- Policy Actors and Coalitions -- Policy Change or Continuation -- Two Guiding Questions -- Hydraulic Fracturing -- Plan of the Book -- United States of America -- Canada -- United Kingdom -- France -- Sweden -- Germany -- Switzerland -- Chapter Summary -- Notes -- References -- Chapter 2: Contours of Coalition Politics on Hydraulic Fracturing Within the United States of America -- Introduction
In: Policy sciences: integrating knowledge and practice to advance human dignity, Band 53, Heft 3, S. 389-394
ISSN: 1573-0891
In: Policy and society, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 59-73
ISSN: 1839-3373
The purpose of this essay is to analyze two theories. One is a relatively new approach called Instrument Constituencies. The other is an established approach called the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). This essay begins by comparing the two theories by an explicit set of criteria. It then lays out opportunities for refinement and advancement of Instrument Constituencies towards its better placement, usefulness, and longevity as a policy process theory. Research prospects at the intersection of Instrument Constituencies and the ACF are then presented with a set of research questions and hypotheses. This essay concludes with a summary of insights about the field of policy processes gained from this theoretical exploration. While there are opportunities for improvements and important caveats for consideration, this essay makes an optimistic argument for the potential of Instrument Constituencies to offer generalizable and context-specific knowledge in helping to advance policy process research.
In: International journal of public administration, Band 34, Heft 7, S. 424-435
ISSN: 1532-4265
In: Policy studies journal: the journal of the Policy Studies Organization, Band 36, Heft 4, S. 615-635
ISSN: 1541-0072
This article reviews and synthesizes the uses of expert‐based information in policy subsystems. The review begins by summarizing the different uses of information in the multiple streams theory, the punctuated equilibrium theory, the social construction theory, and the advocacy coalition framework. Three uses of expert‐based information are identified as instrumental, learning, and political. The three uses of expert‐based information are then compared across unitary, collaborative, and adversarial policy subsystems. This article synthesizes the findings in a set of propositions about the use of expert‐based information in policy subsystems and about the factors that contribute to shifts from one policy subsystem to another.
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 40, Heft 6, S. 853-865
ISSN: 1432-1009
In: Environment and behavior: eb ; publ. in coop. with the Environmental Design Research Association, Band 40, Heft 1, S. 24-45
ISSN: 1552-390X
What factors explain stakeholder benefit–cost expectations for participating in a collaborative institution? This article examines this question by applying a version of the collective interest model. The case study includes original data from a mail-in questionnaire and in-person interviews of stakeholders' expectations before the start of a collaborative process to establish marine-protected areas in California. The results provide little support for the traditional variables in the collective interest model with null results for group and personal efficacy. Selective incentives, especially putting in your own time versus company time, are important in explaining stakeholders' benefit–cost expectations. The results show that ally efficacy is an important factor, suggesting that perceptions of allies compared to opponents shape initial expectations for a collaborative process. This article adds to the research on political participation in environmental management by presenting a rare exploration of ex ante beliefs before the start of a collaborative planning institution.
In: Journal of public administration research and theory, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 95-117
ISSN: 1477-9803
There is a growing recognition that public policy controversies are driven more by value differences than by technical deficiencies. Unfortunately, we have yet to develop, test, and refine systematic approaches for understanding political systems. In this article I explain how the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) can be used as a theoretical basis for understanding political context via a stakeholder analysis. An ACF stakeholder analysis widens the attention of policy analysts toward subsystem-wide dynamics with multiple actors who are motivated by their beliefs, structure their relationships into advocacy coalitions, and try to influence policy through utilizing multiple resources and venues. I illustrate an ACF approach to stakeholder analysis in a scientifically contentious political conflict over the establishment of marine protected areas in California. I conclude with a summary of contributions to the ACF literature and the strengths and limitations of conducting an ACF stakeholder analysis. Adapted from the source document.
In: Journal of public administration research and theory, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 95-118
ISSN: 1053-1858
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of the Western Political Science Association and other associations, Band 58, Heft 3, S. 461
ISSN: 1938-274X
In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of Western Political Science Association, Pacific Northwest Political Science Association, Southern California Political Science Association, Northern California Political Science Association, Band 58, Heft 3, S. 461-476
ISSN: 1065-9129
In: Handbook of Public Policy Analysis; Public Administration and Public Policy, S. 123-136
"The increasingly global study of policy processes faces challenges with scholars applying theories in radically different national and cultural contexts. Questions frequently arise about how to conduct policy process research comparatively and among this global community of scholars. Methods of the Policy Process is the first book to remedy this situation, not by establishing an orthodoxy or imposing upon the policy process community a rigid way of conducting research, but instead, by allowing the leading researchers in the different theoretical traditions a space to share the means by which they put their research into action. This edited volume serves as a companion volume and supplemental guide to the well-established Theories of the Policy Process, 4th Edition. Methods of the Policy Process acknowledges that growth and advancement in the study of the policy process is dependent not merely on conceptual and theoretical development, but also on developing and systematizing better methodological approaches to measurement and analysis. To maximize student engagement with the material, each chapter follows a similar framework: introduction of a given theory of the policy process, application of that theory (including best practices for research design, conceptualization, major data sources, data collection, and methodological approaches), critical assessment, future directions, and online resources (including datasets, survey instruments, and interview and coding protocols). While the structure and focus of each chapter varies slightly according to the theoretical tradition being discussed, each chapter's central aim is to prepare readers to confidently undertake common methodological strategies themselves. Methods of the Policy Process is especially beneficial to people new to the field, including students enrolled in policy process courses, as well as those without access to formal training. For scholars experienced in applying theories, this edited volume is a helpful reference to clarify best practices in research methods"--