Suchergebnisse

The article is devoted to the clarification of the right to free movement of employees and some other persons with the purpose of employment in the European Union. The content of the freedom of employees' movement is analysed and the respective capabilities of people who work or are looking for work are described. It is noted that the term «employee», despite its widespread usage, is not disclosed in legal acts of the EU. At the same time, features of this notion, which were developed by the Court of the European Union, are clarified.The authors research the right to free movement within the EU of other categories of persons who are actually employed, but at the same time with regards to formal features their employment is not considered as a labor relations of hired labor. It is noted that persons who carrying out individual entrepreneurial activities can not benefit from the freedom of movement, since they are subject to the rules on the free movement of services. Also, the freedom of movement of employees does not apply to civil servants.Attention is drawn to the fact that not only the employees, but also members of their families are entitled to freedom of movement. The rights of family members of an employee who are not EU citizens are considered to be derived from the rights and obligations of a worker, who has the EU citizenship. That is why they exist as long as the employee retains his status.It is argued that the freedom of movement is not absolute and can be subjected to certain restrictions. In particular, it may be restricted with regards to public order, public health and public safety. It is mentioned that the existence of unterminated conviction is not a ground for the application of restrictive measures. Like the expiry of the validity of the identity documents, which were the base for the entrance to the territory of a Member State, can not be the reason for the expulsion of that person from the country.The article describes the classification of EU legal acts that determine the freedom of movement of employees within the European Union and guarantee the free movement of members of their families and certain other categories of persons. It is proposed to divide the EU acts regulating the relevant relations into two groups. To the first one, the authors include the acts that regulate the implementation of the right to free movement of EU employees and their family members. The second group consists of those acts that establish the rules of employment in the EU for third-country nationals. ; Статтю присвячено з'ясуванню права на вільне пересування працівників та деяких інших осіб з метою працевлаштування у Європейському Союзі. Проаналізовано зміст свободи переміщення працівників та охарактеризовано відповідні можливості осіб, які працюють або ж шукають роботу. Відзначено, що поняття «працівник», незважаючи на його доволі широке використання, у правових актах ЄС не розкрито. Водночас з'ясовано ознаки цього поняття, що були напрацьовані Судом Європейського Союзу.Розглянуто право на вільне пересування у межах ЄС інших категорій осіб, що є фактично зайнятими, але, за формальними ознаками їхня зайнятість не вважається трудо­вими відносинами найманої праці. Наголошено, що особи, які провадять індивідуальну підприємницьку діяльність не можуть скористатися свободою вільного пересування, адже на них поширюються правила щодо вільного переміщення послуг.Обґрунтовано, що свобода вільного пересування не є абсолютною та підлягає певним обмеженням. Зокрема, вона може бути обмежена заради забезпечення публічного порядку, громадського здоров'я та громадської безпеки.Подано класифікацію правових актів ЄС, які визначають свободу переміщення праців­ників у межах Європейського Союзу та гарантують можливість вільного пересування за членами їхніх сімей і деякими іншими категоріями осіб.

The article is devoted to the clarification of the right to free movement of employees and some other persons with the purpose of employment in the European Union. The content of the freedom of employees' movement is analysed and the respective capabilities of people who work or are looking for work are described. It is noted that the term «employee», despite its widespread usage, is not disclosed in legal acts of the EU. At the same time, features of this notion, which were developed by the Court of the European Union, are clarified.The authors research the right to free movement within the EU of other categories of persons who are actually employed, but at the same time with regards to formal features their employment is not considered as a labor relations of hired labor. It is noted that persons who carrying out individual entrepreneurial activities can not benefit from the freedom of movement, since they are subject to the rules on the free movement of services. Also, the freedom of movement of employees does not apply to civil servants.Attention is drawn to the fact that not only the employees, but also members of their families are entitled to freedom of movement. The rights of family members of an employee who are not EU citizens are considered to be derived from the rights and obligations of a worker, who has the EU citizenship. That is why they exist as long as the employee retains his status.It is argued that the freedom of movement is not absolute and can be subjected to certain restrictions. In particular, it may be restricted with regards to public order, public health and public safety. It is mentioned that the existence of unterminated conviction is not a ground for the application of restrictive measures. Like the expiry of the validity of the identity documents, which were the base for the entrance to the territory of a Member State, can not be the reason for the expulsion of that person from the country.The article describes the classification of EU legal acts that determine the freedom of movement of employees within the European Union and guarantee the free movement of members of their families and certain other categories of persons. It is proposed to divide the EU acts regulating the relevant relations into two groups. To the first one, the authors include the acts that regulate the implementation of the right to free movement of EU employees and their family members. The second group consists of those acts that establish the rules of employment in the EU for third-country nationals. ; Статтю присвячено з'ясуванню права на вільне пересування працівників та деяких інших осіб з метою працевлаштування у Європейському Союзі. Проаналізовано зміст свободи переміщення працівників та охарактеризовано відповідні можливості осіб, які працюють або ж шукають роботу. Відзначено, що поняття «працівник», незважаючи на його доволі широке використання, у правових актах ЄС не розкрито. Водночас з'ясовано ознаки цього поняття, що були напрацьовані Судом Європейського Союзу.Розглянуто право на вільне пересування у межах ЄС інших категорій осіб, що є фактично зайнятими, але, за формальними ознаками їхня зайнятість не вважається трудо­вими відносинами найманої праці. Наголошено, що особи, які провадять індивідуальну підприємницьку діяльність не можуть скористатися свободою вільного пересування, адже на них поширюються правила щодо вільного переміщення послуг.Обґрунтовано, що свобода вільного пересування не є абсолютною та підлягає певним обмеженням. Зокрема, вона може бути обмежена заради забезпечення публічного порядку, громадського здоров'я та громадської безпеки.Подано класифікацію правових актів ЄС, які визначають свободу переміщення праців­ників у межах Європейського Союзу та гарантують можливість вільного пересування за членами їхніх сімей і деякими іншими категоріями осіб.

The article examines the system of standards for the right to freedom of movement and the right to free choice of residence that exist in the European Union. A wide range of general and special legal methods and techniques of scientific knowledge are used, in particular: comparative law, systemstructural and formal- dogmatic research methods, as well as the methods of scientific knowledge (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, classification, etc). As a result of the study, the author substantiates the scientific position that the existing system of standards for the right to freedom of movement and the right to free choice of residence in Ukraine only partially meets the standards of these rights that exist in EU member states. The difference between these standards exists on the level of specifics of legal regulation for the implementation of these human rights by family members of citizens of EU member states, as well as the goals pursued by the implementation of relevant standards. Bringing Ukrainian standards of these human rights in line with European counterparts involves rule-making activities of public administration. The source of such rule-making should be Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (2004). The effectiveness of bringing Ukrainian standards for the right to freedom of movement and the right to free choice of residence in line with EU standard will be increased significantly if the public administration has standards for legal regulation of relations between it and individuals in the process of exercising these rights by the latter. In our opinion, the Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift zum Freizügigkeitsgesetz / EU (AVV zum FreizügG / EU) (General Administrative Code of the Law on Freedom of Movement of Citizens) can be considered as such a standard, as it is created in strict accordance with the EU Directive and other EU legal acts

In article the development of Free Сossacks movement is researched in Katerinoslav province in 1917 – 1918. Premises, reasons, social base and nature of the Cossack movement are considered. The author elucidates the process of arising, formation and development of these organizations, as well as their ligaments with Odesa Ukrainian Military Council and section of Free Cossacks attached to it. Especial attention is payed to armed conflicts detween the Free Cossacks and Red Guard. ; У статті досліджується розвиток Вільного козацтва на Катеринославщині у 1917 - 1918 рр. Розглядаються передумови, причини, соціальна база та характер козацького руху. Автор з'ясовує процес виникнення, становлення та розвитку даних організацій, а також їх зв'язок з Одеською Українською військовою радою та секцією Вільного козацтва при ній. Особливу увагу було звернено на збройне протистояння вільних козаків та червоногвардійців.

In article the development of Free Сossacks movement is researched in Katerinoslav province in 1917 – 1918. Premises, reasons, social base and nature of the Cossack movement are considered. The author elucidates the process of arising, formation and development of these organizations, as well as their ligaments with Odesa Ukrainian Military Council and section of Free Cossacks attached to it. Especial attention is payed to armed conflicts detween the Free Cossacks and Red Guard. ; У статті досліджується розвиток Вільного козацтва на Катеринославщині у 1917 - 1918 рр. Розглядаються передумови, причини, соціальна база та характер козацького руху. Автор з'ясовує процес виникнення, становлення та розвитку даних організацій, а також їх зв'язок з Одеською Українською військовою радою та секцією Вільного козацтва при ній. Особливу увагу було звернено на збройне протистояння вільних козаків та червоногвардійців.

Дана стаття присвячена огляду головних причин та рушійних сил формування українських збройних формацій для боротьби проти більшовицької навали в 1917 році на території Сумщини.Дана робота є актуальною завдяки введенню в науковий обіг неопублікованих архівних документів, які переконливо свідчать про національний характер українського антибільшовицького руху.Після прийняття 7 листопада 1917 року Українською Центральною Радою ІІІ Універсалу, яким було задекларовано створення та автономію УНР, селяни Сумщини підтримали Центральну Раду, вважаючи себе громадянами новоствореної держави/Також позитивно до Української Центральної Ради поставилися і військові, що були розквартировані на території Сумщини.Подібне ставлення до Центральної Ради було домінуючим серед усього українського населення Сумщини, про що свідчать архівні документи.Взагалі, українізація позитивно впливала на військову дисципліну, адже тепер вояки знаходилися на власній землі і мали боронити рідну країну.Більше того, із появою на карті нової геополітичної формації – УНР, виникає доконечна потреба у створенні власної армії.Центральна Рада, яка складалася переважно із соціалістів, вважала недоцільним створення власної армії. Така політична короткозорість зіграла свою негативну роль під час війни проти більшовицьких військ уже наприкінці 1917 року.Формування власних військових сил та збройних формувань відбувалося «знизу», тобто завдяки енергії та бажанням простого народу, який об'єднувався в загони Вільного Козацтва, що спочатку виконували міліційні функції, а потім – у 1919 році – І пол. 20­х років стали основою повстанського руху. Також українська армія поповнилася українізованими частинами колишньої царської армії.Створення українських добровільних загонів йшло по всій території Сумщини – на Глухівщині, Шостківщині, Роменщині, Лебединщині.Можна відзначити, що 1917 рік став переломним для становлення Української держави, а більшовицька агресія 9 грудня 1917 року – каталізатором, завдяки якому почала формуватись українська самосвідомість селянського населення. ; Дана стаття присвячена огляду головних причин та рушійних сил формування українських збройних формацій для боротьби проти більшовицької навали в 1917 році на території Сумщини.Дана робота є актуальною завдяки введенню в науковий обіг неопублікованих архівних документів, які переконливо свідчать про національний характер українського антибільшовицького руху.Після прийняття 7 листопада 1917 року Українською Центральною Радою ІІІ Універсалу, яким було задекларовано створення та автономію УНР, селяни Сумщини підтримали Центральну Раду, вважаючи себе громадянами новоствореної держави/Також позитивно до Української Центральної Ради поставилися і військові, що були розквартировані на території Сумщини.Подібне ставлення до Центральної Ради було домінуючим серед усього українського населення Сумщини, про що свідчать архівні документи.Взагалі, українізація позитивно впливала на військову дисципліну, адже тепер вояки знаходилися на власній землі і мали боронити рідну країну.Більше того, із появою на карті нової геополітичної формації – УНР, виникає доконечна потреба у створенні власної армії.Центральна Рада, яка складалася переважно із соціалістів, вважала недоцільним створення власної армії. Така політична короткозорість зіграла свою негативну роль під час війни проти більшовицьких військ уже наприкінці 1917 року.Формування власних військових сил та збройних формувань відбувалося «знизу», тобто завдяки енергії та бажанням простого народу, який об'єднувався в загони Вільного Козацтва, що спочатку виконували міліційні функції, а потім – у 1919 році – І пол. 20­х років стали основою повстанського руху. Також українська армія поповнилася українізованими частинами колишньої царської армії.Створення українських добровільних загонів йшло по всій території Сумщини – на Глухівщині, Шостківщині, Роменщині, Лебединщині.Можна відзначити, що 1917 рік став переломним для становлення Української держави, а більшовицька агресія 9 грудня 1917 року – каталізатором, завдяки якому почала формуватись українська самосвідомість селянського населення. ; This article provides an overview of the main causes and driving forces behind the formation of the Ukrainian military formations to fight against the Bolshevik invasion in 1917 in the Sumy region.This work is relevant due to the introduction of the scientific use of unpublished archival documents that strongly suggest the national character of Ukrainian anti­Bolshevik movement.After taking 7 November 1917 Ukrainian Central Rada Universal III who was declared the creation and autonomy UPR farmers Sumy, supported by the Central Council , considering themselves citizens of the newly formed state. Also positively to the Ukrainian Central Rada treated and military who were stationed in the Sumy region. This attitude to the Central Council was dominant among all Ukrainian population Sumy, evidence of archival documents. Generally, ukrainization positive effect on military discipline , because now the soldiers were on their own land and had to defend the homeland. Moreover, with the emergence of a new geopolitical map formation ­ UNR , there urgently need to create their own army.Central Council, which consisted mostly of socialists considered it inappropriate to establish their own army. This political short­sightedness played a negative role in the war against Bolshevik forces in late 1917.Forming their own armed forces and armed groups took place «below», because of the energy and the desire of ordinary people who united the ranks of the Free Cossacks , originally performed militias function, and then ­ in 1919 ­ 20s were the basis of the insurgency. Also enriched Ukrainian army of the former imperial army.Create Ukrainian voluntary groups went across the Sumy region ­ in Gluhovschina, Shostkivschyna , Romenshchyna, Lebedynschyna .It may be noted that 1917 was a turning point for the Ukrainian state and Bolshevik's aggression December 9, 1917 ­ the catalyst through which began forming self Ukrainian peasant population.

The article is devoted studying of principles with which one of the basic freedoms of "the Single Market", namely free movement of capital is provided. Position of constituent contracts, judiciary practice, norms of certificates of the secondary right of the European Union is analyzed. Out existing basically free movement of capital of an exception are found. ; Статья посвящена изучению принципов, которыми обеспечивается одна из основных свобод «единого рынка», – свободное движение капитала. Анализируются положение учредительных договоров, судебная практика, нормы актов вторичного права Европейского Союза. Выясняются существующие в принципе свободного движения капитала исключения. ; Статтю присвячено дослідженню принципів, якими забезпечується одна з основних свобод «єдиного ринку», – вільних рух капіталу. Аналізуються положення установчих договорів, судова практика, норми актів вторинного права Європейського Союзу. З'ясовується, які існують винятки з принципу вільного руху капіталу.

У статті досліджується військово-організаційна діяльність генерала Михайла Омеляновича-Павленка під час становлення та організації Українського вільного козацтва (УВК). Видатний український військовий діяч, командарм доби національно-визвольних змагань був серед організаторів та командирів УВК у період української революції 1917-1918 рр. та в міжвоєнну добу в еміграції, у роки Другої світової війни та післявоєнний час на території Чехословаччини й Німеччини. ; Исследуются военно-организационная деятельность генерала Михайла Омеляновича-Павленко по становлению и организации Украинского Вольного Казачества (УВК). Выдающийся украинский военный деятель, командарм эпохи национально-освободительного движения был среди организаторов и командиров УВК в период украинской революции 1917-1920 гг. и в межвоенный период в эмиграции, в годы Второй мировой войны и послевоенное время на територии Чехословакии и Германии. ; Military-organizational activity of General Mykhailo Omelianovych-Pavlenko concerning establishment and organization of Ukrainian Free Cossacks movement is investigated. Outstanding Ukrainian military activist, army commander in the period of national-liberation movement was among the organizers and commanders of Free Cossacks movement in the period of Ukrainian revolution of 1917-1920 and between wars in emigration, during World War II, and in postwar on theterritoryofCzechoslovakiaandGermany.

The article explains the concept of "worker" and its identification features following European Union labour law. EU legal acts that directly or indirectly interpret this term are analyzed. For example, some EU directives point to the need to refer to national law to interpret the term "worker", while others interpret it independently. Such an interpretation will be different because of the purpose of the directives, which are enshrined and conditioned by the various EU social policy objectives within which a relevant legal act is adopted. The characteristics of this concept, which were argued by the Court of the European Union, are clarified. It is noted that there is no single approach to defining the term "worker" in the European Union. Moreover, its interpretation may vary depending on the scope.The EU Court has held that any person is a worker if she/he performs work for remuneration and under the control of another person, the content of which is not determined by that person independently, regardless of the basis of the employment relationship. The EU Court also advises national courts to assess the scale and importance of employment in the context of employee identification. All in all, only those who work effectively and really can obtain employee status, except for activities on such a small scale that they should be regarded as minor and exclusively supportive. That is why, when deciding to confirm employee status, national courts must assess all the factual circumstances that characterize employment, as well as the elements of the legal relationship that arose between the parties to the dispute.It is emphasized that the interpretation of the concept of "worker" at the EU level depends on the content and scope of the rights and obligations of the subjects of the employment relationship. There is a tendency to unify the concept of "worker", which is traced in the case-law of the EU Court concerning both primary and secondary law.The threats that can be triggered by establishing a universal definition of the term "worker" are analyzed. On the one hand, a unified concept will promote a uniform application of EU law and will not allow the Member States to manipulate national interpretations with legal exceptions to this concept. At the same time, the communitarian concept of "worker" may restrict access to labour guarantees for persons who are in similar employment relationships, but will not be considered to be due to a narrow interpretation of the term.It is emphasized that the supranational concept of "worker" will help to remove obstacles to the full realization of freedom of movement for employment.The article deals with subordination, remuneration, effective and genuine work as criteria that collectively identify a person as a hired worker. ; Статтю присвячено з'ясуванню поняття «працівник» та його ідентифікуючих ознак у трудовому праві в Європейському Союзі. Проаналізовано правові акти ЄС, що прямо чи опосередковано тлумачать цей термін. Водночас з'ясовано ознаки цього поняття, що були напрацьовані Судом Європейського Союзу. Відзначено, що єдиного підходу щодо визна­чення поняття «працівник» у Європейському Союзі немає. Більше того, його тлу­мачення може змінюватися залежно від сфери застосування.Наголошено, що інтерпретація поняття «працівник» на рівні ЄС відбувається залежно від змісту та обсягу прав і обов'язків суб'єктів трудових правовідносин. З'ясовано тенден­цію щодо уніфікації поняття «працівник», яка простежується у практиці Суду ЄС як щодо пер­вин­ного, так і вторинного права. Проналізовано загрози закріплення універсального визначення «працівник». Водночас акцентовано, що наднаціональне поняття «працівник» сприятиме ліквідації перешкод для повної реалізації свободи руху з метою праце­влаштування.Розглянуто відносини субординації, винагороду за виконану роботу, ефективну та справжню трудову діяльності як ознаки, що у своїй сукупності, допомагають ідентифікувати особу як найманого працівника.

The purpose of this article is to study the participation of Volodymyr Moshynsky (1895-1988) in the Ukrainian Cossack movement, who for some time was a representative of the Odessa center of the Ukrainian revolution of 1917-1921, but the main stage of his life took place in North America in the second half of the twentieth century. The article is based on the use of a wide source base of published narrative sources, the most important of which are the memoirs and works of V. Moshinsky. Biographical, prosopographic, historical-genetic methods, as well as a number of generally accepted scientific methods were used to implement the tasks. The historiographical work on the figure of V. Moshinsky is narrow and clearly inadequate to the scale of his activity. It is mentioned in a limited number of publications and sometimes in a false context. V. Moshynsky's articles show that he was fully aware of his Cossack ancestral roots and was proud of them. There was a harmonious connection between the facts of his biography and his interests, as he had to work in the interwar period in the area where his wife's ancestors came from the Danube Cossacks. In October 1917, during a confrontation with the Bolsheviks in Moscow, V. Moshinsky became friends with the Amur Cossacks, who almost persuaded him to go with them to the Far East. V. Moshinsky received scientific information about the history of the Ukrainian Cossacks at lectures of the leading Odessa Cossack scholar M. Slabchenko. The Cossack trace in V. Moshinsky's biography was most clearly reflected in his activity in the Cossack Ukrainian movement in the USA. In the 1970s, he was one of the leaders, clerk, tent of the Ukrainian Free Cossacks in Denver named after the commander, the first knight of the Iron Cross, Colonel-General Mikhail Omelyanovich-Pavlenko. V. Moshynsky received the rank of Cossack lieutenant colonel and later colonel. The main body of the free Cossack movement in the United States was the magazine "Ukrainian Cossacks", published from the late 1960s to ...

Problem setting. The order of cross-border goods and vehicles for commercial use is the basis of the state customs. As a result of the movement of goods in foreign economic entities is subject to certain subjective rights and legal responsibilities. A person who carries out the movement, to pay taxes and fees, return the product for a certain period unchanged (the temporary removal) to keep the goods in a particular state (customs warehouse regime) to carry the goods on certain route (transit mode). There is also entitled to recover VAT on the free use of the goods (in Ukraine or abroad), change the customs regime free of import and export and so on. Transported goods are not the same status, heterogeneity, specific features. They are moving from the point of view of customs law, an object owned by a specific subject, with the customs value. In many cases, their signs are installed by specialized laws of the various areas of law. Bans and restrictions on the movement established a wide range of laws and regulations (depending on the type of goods subject movement, customs regulations, means and transportation). The list of goods allowed to move, does not exist. Similarly, there is no single list of goods prohibited by the customs. Recent research and publications analysis. The issue of moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine are still scarcely explored and controversial legal science in general and in particular customs law. Of course, the movement of goods and its components to some extent, been the subject of distribution was the same theoretical studies in the works B.M. Habrichidze, A.V . Grebelnyka, E.V . Dodina, S.V. Kivalova, O.M. Kozyrina, B.A. Kormicha, A.V . Mazura, V. Naumenko, P.V . Pashka, V.V. Prokopenka, D.V. Pryimachenka, K.K. Sandrovskoho, S.S. Tereshchenka, D.S. Tsalinoyi and others. Review of scientific works leads to the conclusion that despite the obvious signs of apparent legislative wording in this area there is still a lack of understanding of many aspects and features of exercise and movement. Positive perception of Ukraine international legal doctrine in customs led establishment of new approaches, some of which are reflected in the Customs Code of 2012 thus moving goods in a transboundary movement requires further thorough research relevant customs and legal regulation. Paper objective. The purpose of the article is to analyze normative legal acts and scientific literature to identify the main components of the movement of goods - customs regimes and customs clearance. In accordance with the designated purpose of the following objectives: analysis of the normative acts that regulate application of customs regimes and customs clearance; clarify the legal status of participants moving; proposals to improve legislation aimed at regulating the movement of goods through the customs border of Ukraine. Paper main body. One of the key places in moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine belongs customs regulations and customs clearance. Customs regimes established exclusively by the Customs Code. With customs regimes carried out state influence on the development of foreign economic relations. A component of the customs regime reflects the customs policy. The current Customs Code of Ukraine (Art. 70) found that in order to apply the law of Ukraine on Civil customs introduced customs regimes: 1) imports (release for free circulation); 2) re-import; 3) exports (final export); 4) re-export; 5) transit; 6) the temporary admission; 7) temporary export; 8) customs warehouse; 9) free customs zone; 10) free trade; 11) inward processing; 12) processing outside the customs territory; 13) destruction or destruction; 14) failure to state. Custom regime has its own internal structure that is revealed through the contents that is provided requirements and restrictions. Under the terms of the customs regime understood the circumstances that lead to the possibility of room under it for goods and vehicles, restrictions - direct or indirect prohibition to carry with them certain actions and requirements - actions are related to the implementation feasibility of completing the customs regime When moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine is determined by its country of origin. This information is needed to use taxation and non-tariff measures. Under the country of origin of goods is the country in which the goods were fully produced or subjected to sufficient processing in accordance with the criteria set out in MK Ukraine. Due to the existence of differential customs duties (depending on the country of origin) customs tariff is an effective tool in foreign relations. Country of origin of goods is one of the main elements of the regulation of trade flows between countries is essential in the implementation of foreign trade agreements Conclusions of the research. Moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine is the main location, which is based customs. It brings together in a single unit all provisions of the Customs Code. Its components, especially, are the customs regimes, the customs clearance, the customs control, the customs formalities and the risk management. As for components that were considered in this study, it is possible to recognize the following. Customs regimes are the most voluminous institutes of the customs law. Through cross-border, economic operators elect customs regime provided for by the customs legislation and implement its clearance in accordance with established procedures. The choice depends on the particular administrative or fiscal prescription. The features are purpose of moving, origin (Ukrainian or foreign) status of the goods after customs clearance, payment of customs duties and some other features. By approving features and procedure for customs clearance, the legislator establishes rules for movement of goods through the customs border of Ukraine. These rules are defined conducted customs policy. ; Раскрыто содержание и структуру перемещения товаров через таможенную границу Украины. Обращено внимание на такие составляющие, как таможенные режимы, таможенное оформление, определение таможенной стоимости и страны происхождения товара. ; Розкрито зміст і структуру переміщення товарів через митний кордон України. Основну увагу сконцентровано на таких складових, як митні режими, оформлення, визначення митної вартості та країни походження товару

Problem setting. The order of cross-border goods and vehicles for commercial use is the basis of the state customs. As a result of the movement of goods in foreign economic entities is subject to certain subjective rights and legal responsibilities. A person who carries out the movement, to pay taxes and fees, return the product for a certain period unchanged (the temporary removal) to keep the goods in a particular state (customs warehouse regime) to carry the goods on certain route (transit mode). There is also entitled to recover VAT on the free use of the goods (in Ukraine or abroad), change the customs regime free of import and export and so on. Transported goods are not the same status, heterogeneity, specific features. They are moving from the point of view of customs law, an object owned by a specific subject, with the customs value. In many cases, their signs are installed by specialized laws of the various areas of law. Bans and restrictions on the movement established a wide range of laws and regulations (depending on the type of goods subject movement, customs regulations, means and transportation). The list of goods allowed to move, does not exist. Similarly, there is no single list of goods prohibited by the customs. Recent research and publications analysis. The issue of moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine are still scarcely explored and controversial legal science in general and in particular customs law. Of course, the movement of goods and its components to some extent, been the subject of distribution was the same theoretical studies in the works B.M. Habrichidze, A.V . Grebelnyka, E.V . Dodina, S.V. Kivalova, O.M. Kozyrina, B.A. Kormicha, A.V . Mazura, V. Naumenko, P.V . Pashka, V.V. Prokopenka, D.V. Pryimachenka, K.K. Sandrovskoho, S.S. Tereshchenka, D.S. Tsalinoyi and others. Review of scientific works leads to the conclusion that despite the obvious signs of apparent legislative wording in this area there is still a lack of understanding of many aspects and features of exercise and movement. Positive perception of Ukraine international legal doctrine in customs led establishment of new approaches, some of which are reflected in the Customs Code of 2012 thus moving goods in a transboundary movement requires further thorough research relevant customs and legal regulation. Paper objective. The purpose of the article is to analyze normative legal acts and scientific literature to identify the main components of the movement of goods - customs regimes and customs clearance. In accordance with the designated purpose of the following objectives: analysis of the normative acts that regulate application of customs regimes and customs clearance; clarify the legal status of participants moving; proposals to improve legislation aimed at regulating the movement of goods through the customs border of Ukraine. Paper main body. One of the key places in moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine belongs customs regulations and customs clearance. Customs regimes established exclusively by the Customs Code. With customs regimes carried out state influence on the development of foreign economic relations. A component of the customs regime reflects the customs policy. The current Customs Code of Ukraine (Art. 70) found that in order to apply the law of Ukraine on Civil customs introduced customs regimes: 1) imports (release for free circulation); 2) re-import; 3) exports (final export); 4) re-export; 5) transit; 6) the temporary admission; 7) temporary export; 8) customs warehouse; 9) free customs zone; 10) free trade; 11) inward processing; 12) processing outside the customs territory; 13) destruction or destruction; 14) failure to state. Custom regime has its own internal structure that is revealed through the contents that is provided requirements and restrictions. Under the terms of the customs regime understood the circumstances that lead to the possibility of room under it for goods and vehicles, restrictions - direct or indirect prohibition to carry with them certain actions and requirements - actions are related to the implementation feasibility of completing the customs regime When moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine is determined by its country of origin. This information is needed to use taxation and non-tariff measures. Under the country of origin of goods is the country in which the goods were fully produced or subjected to sufficient processing in accordance with the criteria set out in MK Ukraine. Due to the existence of differential customs duties (depending on the country of origin) customs tariff is an effective tool in foreign relations. Country of origin of goods is one of the main elements of the regulation of trade flows between countries is essential in the implementation of foreign trade agreements Conclusions of the research. Moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine is the main location, which is based customs. It brings together in a single unit all provisions of the Customs Code. Its components, especially, are the customs regimes, the customs clearance, the customs control, the customs formalities and the risk management. As for components that were considered in this study, it is possible to recognize the following. Customs regimes are the most voluminous institutes of the customs law. Through cross-border, economic operators elect customs regime provided for by the customs legislation and implement its clearance in accordance with established procedures. The choice depends on the particular administrative or fiscal prescription. The features are purpose of moving, origin (Ukrainian or foreign) status of the goods after customs clearance, payment of customs duties and some other features. By approving features and procedure for customs clearance, the legislator establishes rules for movement of goods through the customs border of Ukraine. These rules are defined conducted customs policy. ; Раскрыто содержание и структуру перемещения товаров через таможенную границу Украины. Обращено внимание на такие составляющие, как таможенные режимы, таможенное оформление, определение таможенной стоимости и страны происхождения товара. ; Розкрито зміст і структуру переміщення товарів через митний кордон України. Основну увагу сконцентровано на таких складових, як митні режими, оформлення, визначення митної вартості та країни походження товару

Problem setting. The order of cross-border goods and vehicles for commercial use is the basis of the state customs. As a result of the movement of goods in foreign economic entities is subject to certain subjective rights and legal responsibilities. A person who carries out the movement, to pay taxes and fees, return the product for a certain period unchanged (the temporary removal) to keep the goods in a particular state (customs warehouse regime) to carry the goods on certain route (transit mode). There is also entitled to recover VAT on the free use of the goods (in Ukraine or abroad), change the customs regime free of import and export and so on. Transported goods are not the same status, heterogeneity, specific features. They are moving from the point of view of customs law, an object owned by a specific subject, with the customs value. In many cases, their signs are installed by specialized laws of the various areas of law. Bans and restrictions on the movement established a wide range of laws and regulations (depending on the type of goods subject movement, customs regulations, means and transportation). The list of goods allowed to move, does not exist. Similarly, there is no single list of goods prohibited by the customs. Recent research and publications analysis. The issue of moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine are still scarcely explored and controversial legal science in general and in particular customs law. Of course, the movement of goods and its components to some extent, been the subject of distribution was the same theoretical studies in the works B.M. Habrichidze, A.V . Grebelnyka, E.V . Dodina, S.V. Kivalova, O.M. Kozyrina, B.A. Kormicha, A.V . Mazura, V. Naumenko, P.V . Pashka, V.V. Prokopenka, D.V. Pryimachenka, K.K. Sandrovskoho, S.S. Tereshchenka, D.S. Tsalinoyi and others. Review of scientific works leads to the conclusion that despite the obvious signs of apparent legislative wording in this area there is still a lack of understanding of many aspects and features of exercise and movement. Positive perception of Ukraine international legal doctrine in customs led establishment of new approaches, some of which are reflected in the Customs Code of 2012 thus moving goods in a transboundary movement requires further thorough research relevant customs and legal regulation. Paper objective. The purpose of the article is to analyze normative legal acts and scientific literature to identify the main components of the movement of goods - customs regimes and customs clearance. In accordance with the designated purpose of the following objectives: analysis of the normative acts that regulate application of customs regimes and customs clearance; clarify the legal status of participants moving; proposals to improve legislation aimed at regulating the movement of goods through the customs border of Ukraine. Paper main body. One of the key places in moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine belongs customs regulations and customs clearance. Customs regimes established exclusively by the Customs Code. With customs regimes carried out state influence on the development of foreign economic relations. A component of the customs regime reflects the customs policy. The current Customs Code of Ukraine (Art. 70) found that in order to apply the law of Ukraine on Civil customs introduced customs regimes: 1) imports (release for free circulation); 2) re-import; 3) exports (final export); 4) re-export; 5) transit; 6) the temporary admission; 7) temporary export; 8) customs warehouse; 9) free customs zone; 10) free trade; 11) inward processing; 12) processing outside the customs territory; 13) destruction or destruction; 14) failure to state. Custom regime has its own internal structure that is revealed through the contents that is provided requirements and restrictions. Under the terms of the customs regime understood the circumstances that lead to the possibility of room under it for goods and vehicles, restrictions - direct or indirect prohibition to carry with them certain actions and requirements - actions are related to the implementation feasibility of completing the customs regime When moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine is determined by its country of origin. This information is needed to use taxation and non-tariff measures. Under the country of origin of goods is the country in which the goods were fully produced or subjected to sufficient processing in accordance with the criteria set out in MK Ukraine. Due to the existence of differential customs duties (depending on the country of origin) customs tariff is an effective tool in foreign relations. Country of origin of goods is one of the main elements of the regulation of trade flows between countries is essential in the implementation of foreign trade agreements Conclusions of the research. Moving goods through the customs border of Ukraine is the main location, which is based customs. It brings together in a single unit all provisions of the Customs Code. Its components, especially, are the customs regimes, the customs clearance, the customs control, the customs formalities and the risk management. As for components that were considered in this study, it is possible to recognize the following. Customs regimes are the most voluminous institutes of the customs law. Through cross-border, economic operators elect customs regime provided for by the customs legislation and implement its clearance in accordance with established procedures. The choice depends on the particular administrative or fiscal prescription. The features are purpose of moving, origin (Ukrainian or foreign) status of the goods after customs clearance, payment of customs duties and some other features. By approving features and procedure for customs clearance, the legislator establishes rules for movement of goods through the customs border of Ukraine. These rules are defined conducted customs policy. ; Раскрыто содержание и структуру перемещения товаров через таможенную границу Украины. Обращено внимание на такие составляющие, как таможенные режимы, таможенное оформление, определение таможенной стоимости и страны происхождения товара. ; Розкрито зміст і структуру переміщення товарів через митний кордон України. Основну увагу сконцентровано на таких складових, як митні режими, оформлення, визначення митної вартості та країни походження товару

Метою цієї статті є дослідження участі в українському козацькому русі Володимира Мошинського (1895 – 1988), деякий час представника одеського плацдарму Української революції 1917 – 1921 років, але основний етап життя якого відбувся вже у Північній Америці у другій половині ХХ ст. У постаті В. Мошинського маємо одного з найбільш своєрідних популяризаторів історії українського козацтва, козака-практика та козакамитця, козака-мемуариста, багатий життєвий досвід якого єднав незримими узами Україну та діаспору, сприяв збереженню історичної пам'яті про не найпомітніші та не найпопулярніші сторінки козацької історії. ; The purpose of this article is to study the participation of Volodymyr Moshynsky (1895-1988) in the Ukrainian Cossack movement, who for some time was a representative of the Odessa center of the Ukrainian revolution of 1917-1921, but the main stage of his life took place in North America in the second half of the twentieth century. The article is based on the use of a wide source base of published narrative sources, the most important of which are the memoirs and works of V. Moshinsky. Biographical, prosopographic, historical-genetic methods, as well as a number of generally accepted scientific methods were used to implement the tasks. The historiographical work on the figure of V. Moshinsky is narrow and clearly inadequate to the scale of his activity. It is mentioned in a limited number of publications and sometimes in a false context. V. Moshynsky's articles show that he was fully aware of his Cossack ancestral roots and was proud of them. There was a harmonious connection between the facts of his biography and his interests, as he had to work in the interwar period in the area where his wife's ancestors came from the Danube Cossacks. In October 1917, during a confrontation with the Bolsheviks in Moscow, V. Moshinsky became friends with the Amur Cossacks, who almost persuaded him to go with them to the Far East. V. Moshinsky received scientific information about the history of the Ukrainian Cossacks at lectures of the leading Odessa Cossack scholar M. Slabchenko. The Cossack trace in V. Moshinsky's biography was most clearly reflected in his activity in the Cossack Ukrainian movement in the USA. In the 1970s, he was one of the leaders, clerk, tent of the Ukrainian Free Cossacks in Denver named after the commander, the first knight of the Iron Cross, Colonel-General Mikhail Omelyanovich-Pavlenko. V. Moshynsky received the rank of Cossack lieutenant colonel and later colonel. The main body of the free Cossack movement in the United States was the magazine "Ukrainian Cossacks", published from the late 1960s to the 1980s. V. Moshinsky was mentioned in the pages of this magazine as a donor to its publication, was the author of a number of articles. The magazine covered the artistic activity of V. Moshynsky and his children, with the inclusion of this activity in the Cossack context. In 1974, the magazine published an important and so far unique evidence that the Cossack theme was present in the artist's work - a reproduction of his painting in the mid-1950s "Hetman Mazepa before the Battle of Poltava", kept in Montreal, donated to the Women's Society "Daughters of Ukraine". Thus, in the figure of V. Moshinsky we have one of the most original popularizers of the history of the Ukrainian Cossacks, a Cossackpractitioner and a Cossack-artist, a Cossack-memoirist, whose rich life experience united Ukraine and the diaspora with invisible ties, contributed to the preservation of historical memory not the most popular pages of Cossack history. But these pages are the most important for the modern Odessa region, where the problem of saturation of Bessarabia (as well as Odessa and Odessa region in general) with the Ukrainian worldview and culture is acutely relevant. The author considered the Cossacks within the framework of the national tradition, which combined the features of populist and state historiography, which was a typical feature of the North American Ukrainian historiographical tradition.

Метою цієї статті є дослідження участі в українському козацькому русі Володимира Мошинського (1895 – 1988), деякий час представника одеського плацдарму Української революції 1917 – 1921 років, але основний етап життя якого відбувся вже у Північній Америці у другій половині ХХ ст. У постаті В. Мошинського маємо одного з найбільш своєрідних популяризаторів історії українського козацтва, козака-практика та козакамитця, козака-мемуариста, багатий життєвий досвід якого єднав незримими узами Україну та діаспору, сприяв збереженню історичної пам'яті про не найпомітніші та не найпопулярніші сторінки козацької історії. ; The purpose of this article is to study the participation of Volodymyr Moshynsky (1895-1988) in the Ukrainian Cossack movement, who for some time was a representative of the Odessa center of the Ukrainian revolution of 1917-1921, but the main stage of his life took place in North America in the second half of the twentieth century. The article is based on the use of a wide source base of published narrative sources, the most important of which are the memoirs and works of V. Moshinsky. Biographical, prosopographic, historical-genetic methods, as well as a number of generally accepted scientific methods were used to implement the tasks. The historiographical work on the figure of V. Moshinsky is narrow and clearly inadequate to the scale of his activity. It is mentioned in a limited number of publications and sometimes in a false context. V. Moshynsky's articles show that he was fully aware of his Cossack ancestral roots and was proud of them. There was a harmonious connection between the facts of his biography and his interests, as he had to work in the interwar period in the area where his wife's ancestors came from the Danube Cossacks. In October 1917, during a confrontation with the Bolsheviks in Moscow, V. Moshinsky became friends with the Amur Cossacks, who almost persuaded him to go with them to the Far East. V. Moshinsky received scientific information about the history of the Ukrainian Cossacks at lectures of the leading Odessa Cossack scholar M. Slabchenko. The Cossack trace in V. Moshinsky's biography was most clearly reflected in his activity in the Cossack Ukrainian movement in the USA. In the 1970s, he was one of the leaders, clerk, tent of the Ukrainian Free Cossacks in Denver named after the commander, the first knight of the Iron Cross, Colonel-General Mikhail Omelyanovich-Pavlenko. V. Moshynsky received the rank of Cossack lieutenant colonel and later colonel. The main body of the free Cossack movement in the United States was the magazine "Ukrainian Cossacks", published from the late 1960s to the 1980s. V. Moshinsky was mentioned in the pages of this magazine as a donor to its publication, was the author of a number of articles. The magazine covered the artistic activity of V. Moshynsky and his children, with the inclusion of this activity in the Cossack context. In 1974, the magazine published an important and so far unique evidence that the Cossack theme was present in the artist's work - a reproduction of his painting in the mid-1950s "Hetman Mazepa before the Battle of Poltava", kept in Montreal, donated to the Women's Society "Daughters of Ukraine". Thus, in the figure of V. Moshinsky we have one of the most original popularizers of the history of the Ukrainian Cossacks, a Cossackpractitioner and a Cossack-artist, a Cossack-memoirist, whose rich life experience united Ukraine and the diaspora with invisible ties, contributed to the preservation of historical memory not the most popular pages of Cossack history. But these pages are the most important for the modern Odessa region, where the problem of saturation of Bessarabia (as well as Odessa and Odessa region in general) with the Ukrainian worldview and culture is acutely relevant. The author considered the Cossacks within the framework of the national tradition, which combined the features of populist and state historiography, which was a typical feature of the North American Ukrainian historiographical tradition.