Suchergebnisse

This is an advance summary of a forthcoming article in the Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Please check back later for the full article.Referendums are puzzling because they are ubiquitous. Described in the theoretical literature as "veto-player institutions," referendums are used as frequently by autocratic dictators as they are employed in constitutional democracies. As an institution championed by both Hitler and Churchill, as well as Augusto Pinochet and Woodrow Wilson it is not surprising that political scientists of an earlier generation felt that they defied all attempts to develop testable hypotheses and that referendums—in the words of Arend Lijphart from his 1984 book Democracies—"fail to fit any clear universal pattern."More recently, beginning in the 1990s, however scholars from both historical institutional as well as rational choice schools have begun to develop testable propositions as well as they have advanced explanations as to the origins, practice and consequences of the increased use of referendums. Further, in addition to general theories of voting behaviour in referendums, an emerging literature has been established, which has investigated the policy consequences of referendums. These consequences include, lower levels of inequality, higher levels of trust in government and lower levels of public spending. Compared to an earlier period characterised by ideographic single country studies, and a general pessimism regarding the prospect of developing general theories, the study of referendums has entered a 'revolutionary' phase in the Kuhnian sense of the word. While no general paradigm has emerged, scholars are increasingly confident that general recurrent patterns exist and that it is possible to develop law-like statements about the emergence, use, and implications of the use of the referendum.

"This chapter reviews research on political communication in referendums that have become increasingly popular in democracies worldwide. The authors define key characteristics of referendums, touch upon participation in and popular support for referendums, and highlight the differences between them and presidential or parliamentary elections for political actors, the media, and citizens. Furthermore, they discuss findings regarding media effects on issue salience, issue understanding, turnout, and voting behavior. The authors argue that the potential for communication and campaign effects on citizens is generally larger in a referendum campaign than in other electoral contests. Finally, the authors call for more research into referendums that will likely become even more important in the future." (publisher's description)

"Referendums in the European Union" published on by Oxford University Press.

Sollte es im Rahmen eines Scheiterns einer Ratifizierung der EU-Verfassung zu einer Neuverhandlung des Verfassungsvertrages kommen, wird sich möglicherweise in Deutschland die Frage nach einem Referendum über diesen Vertrag neu stellen. Auf dem Hintergrund einer schon seit langem anhaltenden Diskussion um dieses Thema untersucht der Beitrag, ob sich aus dem Grundgesetz die Notwendigkeit eines Referendums über den EU-Verfassungsvertrag ableiten lässt. Weiterhin wird die Frage gestellt, ob auch ohne speziellen Bezug zum Grundgesetz ein solches Referendum wünschenswert und sinnvoll ist, und schließlich wird die verfassungsmäßige Möglichkeit eines solchen Referendums nach dem Grundgesetz betrachtet. Abschließend wird betont, dass die vom Parlamentarischen Rat vorherrschenden Bedenken gegen die Einführungen von Volksabstimmungen heute nach weit verbreiteter Ansicht überholt sind. Sinnvoll wäre daher eine Aufnahme des Referendums in das Grundgesetz für bestimmte Fälle, so dass auch eine mögliche Abstimmung über die EU-Verfassung ihre verfassungsrechtliche Grundlage finden könnte. (ICH)