Suchergebnisse

Bibliography: leaves 124-129. ; The concept of religion in South Africa has been distorted by religious and racial prejuidices. This problem is particularly evident in public schools South African schools have taught Christianity as the only authentic religion, in fact as the only truth. Black parents have not been given a choice of religion for their children. The white government has decided for them Based on the assumption that Christianity is the only legitimate religion, the state has suppressed African indigenous religion at every level of society, but especially in the schools. The thesis examines the indigenous beliefs and practices of the black people in South Africa which were suppressed by Western culture and Christianity. It reveals all the distortions about African Religion by the outside researchers in order to uproot the black people from their way of life so as to colonise them. As a result all the black children are taught to regard Christianity as a "Religion" and their own religion as "culture", the implication being that blacks had no religion until the white man came with Christianity. The thesis also investigates the feelings of the black people about recovering their indigenous religion by having it as a subject in schools. The results reveal that the majority of blacks never dissociated themselves with their religion. Although most are Christians in principle, deep down they practise their own religion. It has also been discovered that there are great lamentations amongst most blacks over the "loss" of some of the indigenous practices. Most have felt alienated from their heritage and identity. It is therefore the interest of the blacks in South Africa that African Religion be taught in schools.

Religion has had a profound influence on the geography, culture, politics, and artistic life of Sydney. While religion has mostly been a conservative force, preserving traditions transported from home societies, it has also reflected the setting and people of Sydney, its harbour, bushland and suburbs. This article reviews the history of religion in Sydney and the role it has played in the lives of those who have made their home here.

This article discusses the position of religion in politics that has relation to leadership. The main argumentation of this research is religion will constantly become a political power and social movement. In one side the research has a different opinion from the integration politic paradigm and secular that proposed by Hasan al-Bannā and 'Alī Abd. al-Rāziq, but in other side, it has reinforced the two paradigms. By using literature study and descriptive method and philosophical historical approach, it indicates Islam will constantly exist and has influence in the political process. Although Islam is not depending on politics and on the contrary. Islam and politic are both integrated dimensions of life, so both are not able to be separated from social political dynamics.

This item is part of the Political & Rights Issues & Social Movements (PRISM) digital collection, a collaborative initiative between Florida Atlantic University and University of Central Florida in the Publication of Archival, Library & Museum Materials (PALMM).

Society is presently living an interesting event: laicity and democracy are permeating its deepest roots. Each continent is facing it in different ways but all of them present the same common denominator. For many people, religion has been outdated within the context of laicity and democracy, No place for a word in its favour should come from families or new generations. For some scholars, the undersigned included, the described situation could be a good stage to establish a constructive dialogue between families, education, State, politics, laicity and democracy… Such an environment has shades and lights but we can´t deny that it is a challenge to generate formative, dynamic and creative processus. ; La sociedad enfrenta actualmente un evento interesante: la democracia y la laicidad van permeando sus raíces más profundas. En cada continente existen matices más o menos diversos, pero en el fondo el asunto tiene ese denominador común. En un contexto de democracia y laicidad, la religión para muchos ha pasado de moda, ni las familias, ni los padres de las nuevas generaciones deben pronunciarse. Para otros estudiosos, como el autor del presente artículo, la situación enunciada representa un escenario propicio para entablar un diálogo constructivo entre familia, educación, estado, política, laicidad, democracia. Un entorno así posee muchas luces y sombras, pero a su vez se erige como un reto capaz de generar procesos formativos dinámicos y creativos.

The relationship between translation and religion, as well as between the translator and the development of religious attitude and behaviour, is of interest to many sciences such as psychology, anthropology, or the sociology of religion, but also to translating. The concept of "monastic translation" (Bueno 2007), or more broadly "religious translation", supports this approach. The relationship of the sacred scriptures with their author undoubtedly marks some differences in translation, which also influence their reception. The identity of the translator is also an important factor in understanding the commitment to the work and function of the target text. The time and space in which this translation work takes place undoubtedly condition the result and allow for the consideration of multiple variants and consequences of their task. The consequences and impact of religious translation on different societies or political systems are measured from the Ancient Age to the Middle Ages and from the Middle Ages to Humanism, the Modern Age or the Contemporary Age. In the age of geographical discovery, the expansion of religions and their translations had very different consequences, depending on the identity of the populations or the character of the recipients of the religious message. Starting from the most well-known religions and the translation activity carried out within them, we analyse here the characteristics of the text, the behaviour of the translator (believer or non-believer, apologetic or critical of the religious system in question) and the value of the translation from multiple perspectives: linguistic, religious, anthropological, sociological, political, etc. From a more general point of view, the value of contemporary or past texts is also examined, as well as the reactions of the recipient to the translated texts, whether they are from the same or a different period.

The great monotheistic religions –Judaism, Christianity, and Islam– agree in announcing God's love for men, while demanding men's love for God and for their neighbors. However, a brief look at these religions' praxis leads to doubt whether this love is not a mere statement, while in history and at present were and are still imposed exclusive truth claims exercising violence against the adepts of the own religion ("internally") and, in especial, against the followers of other religions ("externally") in order to attain political power. Now, a distinction between the just sovereign power of God and detrimental violence should be made, asides from the fact that God's sovereign power and God's concept is not the same in the three great monotheistic religions. In Judaism God governs with love and as king, in Christianity with love and as servant, in Islam with love and majesty. Nevertheless, sovereign power is exclusive of God and detrimental violence is never desired among men. Only thus is power constitutive of religion's inner nature, but not of the relation between religions or of religions with the world: "There is no coercion in religion". ; Las grandes religiones monoteístas –Judaísmo, Cristianismo e Islam– coinciden en anunciar el amor de Dios a los hombres, y reclaman el amor de los hombres a Dios y al prójimo. Sin embargo, una breve mirada a la praxis de estas religiones hace dudar de si este amor no es una mera afirmación, mientras que en la historia y en el presente se impusieron y se imponen las pretensiones exclusivas de verdad mediante el ejercicio de la violencia en contra de los adeptos de la propia religión ("internamente") y, en especial, en contra de los seguidores de otras religiones ("externamente") para así alcanzar el poder político. Ahora bien, hay que distinguir entre el justo poder soberano de Dios y la violencia lesiva, además de que el poder soberano de Dios, al igual que el concepto de Dios, no es el mismo en las tres grandes religiones monoteístas. En el Judaísmo domina Dios con amor y como rey; en el Cristianismo, con amor y como servidor; en el Islam, con amor y majestad. Aunque siempre el poder soberano es exclusivo de Dios y nunca se desea la violencia lesiva entre los hombres. Solo así el poder es constitutivo de la naturaleza interna de la religión, mas no de la relación entre las religiones o de las religiones con el mundo: "No hay coacción en la religión".

25 páginas ; Este artículo explora el problema de la política y la religión en JeanJacques Rousseau desde una perspectiva filosófica. Para ello expone la forma como Rousseau concibe la religión en sus principales obras, destacando su carácter equívoco y polémico. Luego analiza el concepto de la religión civil desde la óptica del papel público que debía desempeñar en la comunidad política. Finalmente, sugiere los argumentos que fundamentan la propuesta rousseauniana como el diseño de una religión civil o política, o si, por el contrario, es una suerte de instrumentalización política de la religión, elemento que lo emparentaría con otros autores modernos. Este texto no pretende resolver el dilema, sino sugerir que hay razones para sostener cualquiera de estas dos lecturas de la obra del ginebrino. ; This article explores the problem of politics and religion in Jean-Jacques Rousseau from a philosophical perspective. In order to achieve this goal, this paper firstly shows how Rousseau conceives religion in his major works, and it emphasizes in their ambiguous and controversial character. After that, this paper analyzes the concept of civil religion based on the public role that it was called to play within the political community. Finally, this paper deals with the issue of whether the arguments behind Rousseau's proposal are the design of a civil or political religion; or is it a sort of political manipulation of religion, and in consequence, an element that evidences a link between Rousseau and other modern authors. The text does not purport to resolve the dilemma, but suggest that there are reasons to support either of these two readings of the work of the author.

Includes indexes. ; "Literatur" at end of each article. ; Geschichte der christlichen Religion, mit Einleitung : Die israelitisch-jüdische Religion / von J. Wellhausen -- Die Religion Jesu und die Aufänge des Christentums bis zum Nicaenum (325) / von A. Jülicher -- Kirche und Staat bis zur Gründung der Staatskirche / von A. Harnack -- Griechisch-orthodoxes Christentum und Kirche in Mittelatler und Neuzeit / von N. Bonwetsch -- Christentum und Kirche Westeuropas im Mittelalter / von K. Müller -- Katholisches Christentum und Kirche in der Neuzeit / von F.X. Funk -- Protestantisches Christentum und Kirche in der Neuzeit / von E. Troeltsch -- Systematische christliche Theologie, mit Einleitung : Wesen der Religion und der Religionswissenschaft / von E. Troeltsch -- Christlich-katholische Dogmatik / von J. Pohle -- Christliche-katholische Ethik / von J. Mausbach -- Christlich-katholische praktische Theologie / von C. Krieg -- Christlich-protestantische Dogmatik / von W. Herrmann -- Christlich-protestantische Ethik / von R. Seeberg -- Christlich-protestantische practische Theologie / von Wilhelm Faber -- Die Zukunftsaufgaben der Religion und der Religionswissenschaft / von Heinrich Julius Holtzmann. ; Mode of access: Internet.

Este artículo explora el problema de la política y la religión en JeanJacques Rousseau desde una perspectiva filosófica. Para ello expone la forma como Rousseau concibe la religión en sus principales obras, destacando su carácter equívoco y polémico. Luego analiza el concepto de la religión civil desde la óptica del papel público que debía desempeñar en la comunidad política. Finalmente, sugiere los argumentos que fundamentan la propuesta rousseauniana como el diseño de una religión civil o política, o si, por el contrario, es una suerte de instrumentalización política de la religión, elemento que lo emparentaría con otros autores modernos. Este texto no pretende resolver el dilema, sino sugerir que hay razones para sostener cualquiera de estas dos lecturas de la obra del ginebrino. ; This article explores the problem of politics and religion in Jean-JacquesRousseau from a philosophical perspective. In order to achieve this goal,this paper firstly shows how Rousseau conceives religion in his majorworks, and it emphasizes in their ambiguous and controversial character. After that, this paper analyzes the concept of civil religion based onthe public role that it was called to play within the political community.Finally, this paper deals with the issue of whether the arguments behindRousseau's proposal are the design of a civil or political religion; or is it asort of political manipulation of religion, and in consequence, an elementthat evidences a link between Rousseau and other modern authors. Thetext does not purport to resolve the dilemma, but suggest that there arereasons to support either of these two readings of the work of the author.

Cécile Laborde's Liberalism's Religion proposes liberal principles to address political controversies over religion. One is the public reason requirement that reasons for state policies should be accessible. Another is the civic inclusiveness requirement according to which symbolic religious establishment is wrong when it communicates that religious identity is a component of civic identity. A third is the claim that liberal states have meta-jurisdictional authority to settle the boundary between what counts as religion and what counts as non-religion. The article considers whether Laborde has managed to articulate these three principles in a way that is operationalisable and can serve to provide solutions to practical controversies over religion. It is argued that Laborde's formulations leave important issues open, and some ways of settling these issues are considered. ; Cécile Laborde's Liberalism's Religion proposes liberal principles to address political controversies over religion. One is the public reason requirement that reasons for state policies should be accessible. Another is the civic inclusiveness requirement according to which symbolic religious establishment is wrong when it communicates that religious identity is a component of civic identity. A third is the claim that liberal states have meta-jurisdictional authority to settle the boundary between what counts as religion and what counts as non-religion. The article considers whether Laborde has managed to articulate these three principles in a way that is operationalisable and can serve to provide solutions to practical controversies over religion. It is argued that Laborde's formulations leave important issues open, and some ways of settling these issues are considered.

The paper examines the compatibility problems between democracy and religion. Problems of special importance when a strict idea of religion arises, with a strong sense of good and a strategy of particular foundation, when democracy is understood as deliberative democracy associated to an ideal of standard correction, an idea sometimes called republican democracy. If religion is understood as a private club its problems are diminished, away from an idea of good claiming its validity, or when democracy is strictly meant in a liberal sense, as a selection system of political elites. ; En este trabajo se examinan los problemas de compatibilidad entre democracia y religión. Los problemas son especialmente importantes cuando la idea de religión es exigente, esto es, cuando contempla una idea fuerte de bien y una estrategia de fundamentación particular, y cuando la democracia se entiende como democracia deliberativa, asociada a un ideal de corrección normativa, una idea de democracia que algunos califican como democracia republicana. Los problemas disminuyen cuando la religión se entiende como un club privado, alejada de una idea de bien con pretensiones de validez, o cuando la democracia se entiende en sentido austeramente liberal, como un sistema de selección de élites políticas.

Revista Perspectivas del Desarrollo Vol.2(2) 2013; 13-41 ; Revista Perspectivas del Desarrollo Vol.2(2) 2013; 13-41

En este trabajo se examinan los problemas de compatibilidad entre democracia y religión. Los problemas son especialmente importantes cuando la idea de religión es exigente, esto es, cuando contempla una idea fuerte de bien y una estrategia de fundamentación particular, y cuando la democracia se entiende como democracia deliberativa, asociada a un ideal de corrección normativa, una idea de democracia que algunos califican como democracia republicana. Los problemas disminuyen cuando la religión se entiende como un club privado, alejada de una idea de bien con pretensiones de validez, o cuando la democracia se entiende en sentido austeramente liberal, como un sistema de selección de élites políticas. ; The paper examines the compatibility problems between democracy and religion. Problems of special importance when a strict idea of religion arises, with a strong sense of good and a strategy of particular foundation, when democracy is understood as deliberative democracy associated to an ideal of standard correction, an idea sometimes called republican democracy. If religion is understood as a private club its problems are diminished, away from an idea of good claiming its validity, or when democracy is strictly meant in a liberal sense, as a selection system of political elites. ; La investigación para este trabajo se ha beneficiado de una ayuda del Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad al Proyecto de investigación: «La calidad de la democracia: una perspectiva normativa» (SO2008-06525-C02-02).

Schon lange Zeit spielt die Religion in Bosnien und Herzegowina (BiH) eine Rolle in der Politik. Dies spiegelt sich am besten durch den Religionsunterricht in den öffentlichen Schulen wieder. Diese Arbeit hat sich das Ziel gesetzt, die rechtlichen Grundlagen, die wichtigsten beteiligten Akteure sowie die Möglichkeiten, die sich aus alldem ergeben, in BiH darzustellen.Obwohl der Status des Religionsunterrichts in BiH durch verschiedene gesetzlich bindende Dokumente definiert ist, führt die Umsetzung zu hitzigen Debatten. In dieser Arbeit werden die Beziehung zwischen Religion und Bildung bestimmt und der Wert von alternativen Ansätzen untersucht. Es werden die folgenden Fragen beantwortet: Ist der Religionsunterricht in BiH diskriminierend? Kann ein Alternativfach, wie "Kultur der Religionen" zur Beseitigung von Diskriminierung führen und die religiöse Toleranz in der Gesellschaft fördern?Rechtlich betrachtet, ist BiH ein säkularer Nicht-Diskriminierungsstaat. Aus der praktischen Sicht, ist BiH kein säkularer Staat, da sich die Religionsgemeinschaften in staatliche Angelegenheiten einmischen, und auch kein Nicht-Diskriminierungsstaat, da die Regierung aufgrund der Drohungen seitens der Religionsgemeinschaften ihre Beschlüsse ändert. Diskriminierung aufgrund der religiösen Zugehörigkeit ist auch bei der Organisation, Gestaltung und Umsetzung des Religionsunterrichts in BiH sichtbar. Die Inhalte der Religionslehrbücher sind so konzipiert, dass sie über eine bestimmte Religion lehren. ; Religion in Bosnia and Herzegovina has been an important topic in politics for quite some time. Religious education in school reflects this well, therefore this masters thesis aims to present the legal framework of religious education in BiH, the often opposing viewpoints and the opportunities that arise in such a setting.Although the status of religious education in BiH is defined by several legally binding documents, the implementation leads to heated debates. This masters thesis explores the relationship between religion and education, as well as the benefits of alternative approaches. Following questions are being raised: Is religious education in BiH discriminatory? Can an alternative school subject, such as i.e. "culture of religions" eliminate discrimination and promote religious tolerance among society?In legal terms, BiH is a secular Non-Discrimination State. Practically however, BiH is not a secular state, due to the involvement of religious communities in state affairs. It is not a Non-Discrimination State either, because threats from religious communities compromise governmental decisions and public policies. The organizational framework and the implementation of religious education in schools are often discriminatory. Each schoolbook dealing with the subject of religion focuses on one particular religious group only. ; Emina Duraković ; Abweichender Titel laut Übersetzung der Verfasserin/des Verfassers ; Zsfassung in dt. und engl. Sprache ; Graz, Univ., Masterarb., 2013 ; (VLID)224775