Suchergebnisse

Dinamika minoritas Konfusiani / Budi Wijaya -- Peranan warga negara dalam pelaksanaan dan perlindungan HAM / Chandra Setiawan -- Posisi agama Khonghucu di Indonesia secara yuridis / Sri Soemantri -- Eksistensi Khonghucu di Indonesia ditinjau dari perspektif yuridis / Hardjono -- Pencatatan perkawinan Khonghucu, mengapa sulit? / Bismar Siregar -- Eksistensi Khonghucu di Indonesia ditinjau dari pespektif sosio-politis / Ramlan Surbakti -- Umat Khonghucu Indonesia dalam bayang-bayang keadilan / Tjandra R. Mulyadi -- Pertimbangan putusan hakim dalam kasus penolakan pencatatan perkawinan / Suwoto Mulyosudarmo -- Keabsahan perkawinan dalam kerangka UU No. 1/1974 / Moch. Isnaeni -- Kasus hukum mengenai akta kelahiran Fuji / Prajudi Atmosudirdjo -- Kongjiao/Khongkauw / Dede Oetomo -- Aspek hukum pencatatan perkawinan secara agama Khonghucu / Anly Cenggana

The 2007 Indonesian investment law granted national treatment for foreign investors, establishing a transparent 'negative list' for out-of-bonds investment sectors, and has been considired as a reformative regulation in Indonesia's economic strategy. However, decentralized systems give autonomy to local governments to manage their projects and infrastructure themselves. This leads into increasiig investment burdens through their opaque measures that are creating perceptions of risk for foreign investors. As a result, lack of legal certainty, inconsistent regulations and judiciary system would hamter investments. This article argues that law 25/2007 should be supported by a comprehensive investment policy to attract more foreign investors into Indonesia. A key element in establishing a competitive region is a free and open investment regime, This article addresses policy impediment to private investment in Indonesia as well as in the ASEAN region. Indonesia and ASEAN should have non-discriminatory treatment extended to foreign investors including ASEAN-based inveitors, as the establishment of ASEAN Economic community (AEC) will cornmence in 2015. Legal certainty of international business transaction by private investors is fostering investments by both direct investment and indirect investment (portfolio). Parties to investment agreements include individuals, small, medium and large multinational corporations, and countries. In this centralized global atmosphere, the Indonesian agovemment has to provide guarantees to leverage private investments.

Development of Indonesian national law should not leave attention to development of legal plurality as its source. Focus of this study is to see the influence of Indonesian social factors on the development of Islamic law and how Islamic law can be integratively transformed into the National Law. By qualitative method and socio-legal approach and constructivism paradigm, this study bases on theories of social change influeces on Islamic law law without leaving methodology of usul fiqh and the sources of Islamic law. Islamic law has broad opportunity and experiences to be integratively transformed into national law within Indonesia's own character. Transformation can be done in the whole structure of Islamic law including its values of philosophy, principles and norms, and can be performed in all areas, both private and public Law, written law by political power and unwritten law with cultural approach. However, Islamic law as one of the Indonesia living laws and the sources of National law, still today is viewed in dichotomy to the National law and only transformed in limited norms. There are many obstacles to be transformed into national law integratively and widely, though Islamic law has wide space of interpretation and intellectualism that can adapt to different contexts and National law.

The problem that often arises today is the impartiality of the local governmentagainst traders in traditional markets that often lead to the implementation of localregulations that marginalize traders and traditional market participants. This alsohappens to traders in Kobong Market who are experiencing displacement by goingthrough a process that violates the procedure.The purpose of this study is to know, review and analyze the understanding ofSemarang municipal government related to the revitalization of fresh fish tradersRejomulyo Market for the sake of justice and welfare and the foundation of tradersdid not approve the transfer of traditional markets by the City GovernmentSemarang.Approach method in this research using socio-legal approach. Specification in thisresearch is qualitative naturalistic. The data used are primary and secondary data.Based on research results, Semarang City Government is less considering theinterests of the community, and consumers who need the supply of fish fromRejomulyo Market. The cornerstone of the traders did not approve the transfer oftraditional markets by Semarang City Government is the absence of clarity about theexact size of the stalls that will be accepted and the new market conditions areconsidered not feasible, and the violation of Article 35 paragraph 1 of the City ofSemarang Regulation no. 9 of 2013 on Traditional Market Arrangement and Article73 paragraph 1 of Regional Regulation of Semarang City No. 7 of 2010 on GreenOpen Space Arrangement.

Mediation is one of dispute resolution process that is faster and cheap, as well as can give access that is greater to all party to find settlement that satisfy and meet justice sense, however mediation implementation in Padang Religion Court class 1 A slight once that succeed in mediation. Problem formulation namely: 1. How mediation implementation in divorce case as peace effort in Padang Religion Court class 1 A ? 2. Factors any that became supporter and mediation success obstacle in Padang Religion Court class 1 A? Sociological juridical approach law research method (socio legal research). Research result: Padang Religion Court conducted peace effort with mediation way, accordance Perma Number 1 Year 2008. Mediation implementation in divorce case not yet went like a bomb. From 636 case that in mediation for January 2013 to June 2014 only 25 case or 3.9 % only divorce case that succeed mediation. Success as well as mediation failure certainly have supporter factor as well as inhibitory factor, among mediation success supporter factor in Padang Religion Court among others: mediator ability, sociological factor and pisikologis all party, moral and kerohaniaan, and good determination all party. Besides it so happens mediation success obstacle factor in Padang Religion Court among others: eager desire all party to divorce, room that is less conducive, mediator number limitation,one of party would not come, and lack of community understanding about mediation. Keyword: Mediation, settlement, divorce, Religion Court.

Changes in regulations concerning employment, in particular regarding dispute resolution mechanisms State Civil Apparatus then indirectly affect the implementation of dispute resolution for the State Civil Apparatus. In contrast to what was in the previous law that the administrative appeals filed with the Personnel Advisory Board. In Article 129 of Constitution Number 5 of 2014 about civilian state apparatus.arranged among others on the administrative appeal submitted to the Advisory Board of civilian state apparatus, in which the efforts of administrative appeals and on the Advisory Board of the civilian state apparatus regulated by Government Regulation. But until now the government regulation has not been issued so that the dispute settlement civilian state apparatus, particularly for government employees with work agreementwill be problems in implementation.Legal protection of the state apparatus in the employment dispute resolution after the enactment of Constitution Number 5 of 2014 about civilian state apparatus can not be optimal be given and legal protection that the government can do isimmediately issued Government Regulation.

Selain memiliki dimensi sosial ekonomi, konflik agraria di Bongkoran, Kabupaten Banyuwangi, Provinsi Jawa Timur, Indonesia, juga memiliki dimensi hukum. Terdapat dualisme hukum yang konfliktual dalam hal penguasaan tanah dan klaim penggunaan. Satu pihak, pemerintah, dan korporasi mengandalkan hukum negara yang legalistik-positivistik, sedangkan masyarakat lokal mengandalkan hukum rakyat yaitu hukum informal yang sudah ada, hidup, dan berkembang dalam masyarakat komunal secara turun-temurun. Penelitian ini berfokus pada bagaimana perspektif sosiologis hukum menganalisis konflik hukum yang terjadi dalam konflik agraria Bongkoran, khususnya antara hukum negara dan hukum rakyat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan perspektif sosiologi hukum. Subjek penelitian adalah petani/masyarakat Bongkoran, Penasehat Hukum Masyarakat, Pemerintah (Pemerintah Daerah, Badan Pertanahan Nasional, dan Kepolisian), dan unsur korporasi (PT Wongsorejo). Informan dipilih dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling, berdasarkan pertimbangan tertentu yang dapat dikenali terlebih dahulu yaitu mengenali dan memahami masalah yang diteliti. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, wawancara mendalam, dan dokumentasi. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis secara kualitatif dengan mengacu pada perspektif yang telah disajikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian konflik agraria di Bongkoran memerlukan implementasi hukum yang lebih berkeadilan bagi masyarakat lokal. Implementasi hukum tidak hanya berdasarkan pasal-pasal yang rigid dalam undang-undang, tetapi perlu memperhatikan konteks sosial budaya dan historis dari masyarakat. Dominasi hukum negara atas hukum rakyat dalam konflik agraria mengakibatkan praktik penundukan hukum negara ke hukum rakyat, baik secara persuasif maupun represif. Oleh karena itu, untuk meminimalisir ketegangan dan konflik antara hukum negara dan hukum rakyat dalam konflik agraria, diperlukan pemahaman baru tentang hubungan kedua hukum tersebut. Keberadaan dan penegakan hukum rakyat dijadikan sebagai elemen yang saling melengkapi dalam aspek normatif yang belum diatur dalam hukum negara. ; Apart from having a socio-economic dimension, agrarian conflicts in Bongkoran, Banyuwangi Regency, East Java Province, Indonesia, also have a legal dimension. There is a dualism of law that is conflictual in terms of land tenure and use claims. One party, the government, and corporations rely on legalistic-positivistic state laws, while local people rely on folk law, namely informal laws that have existed, lived, and developed in communal society for generations. This research focuses on how the sociological perspective of law analyzes the legal conflicts that occur in Bongkoran agrarian conflict, particularly between state law and folk law. This research used a qualitative method with a legal sociology perspective. The research subjects were farmers/people of Bongkoran, Community Legal Advisors (CLA), Government (Local Government, National Land Agency, and Police), and corporate elements (PT Wongsorejo). Informants were selected using a purposive sampling technique, based on certain considerations that can be recognized beforehand, namely recognizing and understanding the problem under this research. Data collection was conducted through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The collected data were analyzed qualitatively by referring to the perspectives that have been presented. The results indicated that the resolution of agrarian conflicts in Bongkoran requires the implementation of laws that are more just for local communities. The implementation of the laws is not only based on rigid articles in the law, but it needs attention to the socio-cultural and historical context of the community. The dominance of state law over folk law in agrarian conflicts results in the practice of subjugation of state law to folk law, both persuasively and repressively. Therefore, to minimize the tension and conflict between state law and folk law in agrarian conflicts, it is necessary to have a new understanding of the relationship between the two laws. The existence and enforcement of folk law are used as a complementary element in normative aspects that have not been regulated in state law.

Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran umumnya tidak menyukai Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik dan Medikolegal tetapi mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran harus mengetahui Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik dan Medikolegal oleh karena dalam mata kuliah tersebut dijelaskan bagaimana caranya penegak hukum minta bantuan kepada dokter baik dokter spesialis forensik, dokter spesialis yang lain maupun dokter umum, dan bagaimana caranya dokter memberi bantuan kepada penegak hukum. Peranan Ilmu kedokteran Forensik dan Medikolegal diatur di dalam KUHP, KUHAP, Undang-Undang RI No. 23 tahun 1992 tentang Kesehatan, Undang-Undang RI No. 29 tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran dan Peraturan-peraturan Pelaksanaannya.