Suchergebnisse

Питання взаємовідносин держави та громадськості в суспільному житті історично завжди виникало й спричинювало різні теоретичні погляди. Об'єднання громадян в усі часи покликані захищати інтереси людини, боротися проти тиранії, державного «левіафану». Однак лише наприкінці ХХ століття громадські об'єднання і організації врешті-решт позбавилися від тотального державного контролю, остаточно позбулися від ототожнення з державою. Водночас, форми участі організованої громадськості в державному управління набули мирних способів. Метою статті є аналіз світових тенденцій модернізації державного управління: досвід для України. Адже в контексті сучасних суспільно-трансформаційних процесів громадські організації вийшли на новий рівень взаємовідносин з державою. Державне управління трансформується в «публічне», яке своєю чергою, характеризується відкритістю, прозорістю, широким залученням інститутів громадянського суспільства до державно - управлінських процесів. Нині відсутній єдиний підхід до визначення форм і методів взаємодії органів державної влади з організованою громадськістю. Науковці виділяють різноманітні форми їх взаємодії, як інформування, консультації, громадські слухання, громадські експертизи, дорадчі комітети, громадськіініціативи, моніторинг громадської думки, громадське представництво в радах, просвіта, круглі столи, громадський контроль тощо. В законодавстві визначено правові форми взаємодії органів державної влади з інститутами громадянського суспільства, а саме: участь інститутів громадянського суспільства у нормотворчій, правозастосовчій й правоохоронній діяльності держави. Необхідно констатувати що підходи до класифікації форм і методів участі організацій громадянського суспільства в публічному управлінні досить умовні й різноманітні. Не перестають з'являтися нові форми взаємодії держави і організованої громадськості. У статті проаналізовані основні концепції взаємодії. Досліджено світові інноваційні механізми та технології управління. Систематизовано основні етапи соціальогое партнерства. ; The question of the relationship between the state and the public in public life has historically always arisen and caused different theoretical views. Citizens' associations are always called to protect human interests, to fight against tyranny, the state "leviathan". However, it was not until the end of the twentieth century that public associations and organizations finally got rid of total state control and finally got rid of identification with the state. At the same time, forms of organized public participation in public administration have become peaceful. The aim of the article is to analyze global trends in public administration modernization: experience for Ukraine. After all, in the context of modern social and transformational processes, public organizations have reached a new level of relations with the state. Public administration is transformed into "public", which in turn is characterized by openness, transparency, broad involvement of civil society institutions in public administration processes. Currently, there is no single approach to determining the forms and methods of interaction between public authorities and the organized public. Scholars identify various forms of their interaction, such as information, consultation, public hearings, public examinations, advisory committees, public initiatives, public opinion monitoring, public representation on councils, education, round tables, public control, and more. The legislation defines the legal forms of interaction of public authorities with civil society institutions, namely: the participation of civil society institutions in law-making, law enforcement and law enforcement activities of the state.It should be noted that approaches to the classification of forms and methods of participation of civil society organizations in public administration are quite conditional and diverse. New forms of interaction between the state and the organized public do not cease to appear. The article analyzes the basic concepts of interaction. The world innovative mechanisms and management technologies are studied. The main stages of social partnership are systematized.

The article describes the functions of the subjects state management of land relations that define the essence of the activity for last ones, the features of the implementation of such functions and the factors that prevents to implement it effectively for subjects of management. According to the analysis of system-universal characteristics of modern regulatory support measures for the effective implementation of the functions of government land relations are formed. ; Розглянуто функції суб'єктів державного управління земельними відносинами, що визначають сутність діяльності останніх, визначено особливості реалізації таких функцій та чинники, які перешкоджають суб'єктам управління їх ефективно виконувати. За результатами аналізу системно-універсальних характеристик сучасного нормативно-правового забезпечення сформовано заходи для ефективної реалізації функцій органів управління земельними відносинами.

The article describes the functions of the subjects state management of land relations that define the essence of the activity for last ones, the features of the implementation of such functions and the factors that prevents to implement it effectively for subjects of management. According to the analysis of system-universal characteristics of modern regulatory support measures for the effective implementation of the functions of government land relations are formed. ; Розглянуто функції суб'єктів державного управління земельними відносинами, що визначають сутність діяльності останніх, визначено особливості реалізації таких функцій та чинники, які перешкоджають суб'єктам управління їх ефективно виконувати. За результатами аналізу системно-універсальних характеристик сучасного нормативно-правового забезпечення сформовано заходи для ефективної реалізації функцій органів управління земельними відносинами.

Досліджено особливості та сутність інноваційного мислення як чинника розвитку публічного врядування. Обґрунтовано положення про те, що інноваційне мислення є особливим різновидом рефлексії, процесом опосередкування різних граней управління та формування якісно нових результатів діяльності – теоретичних концептів дійсності та практичних моделей її реальних змін. Розкрито низку напрямів і засобів модернізації публічного врядування шляхом запровадження раціональних нововведень. ; Problem setting. An essential feature of Ukrainian nowadays is the process of reforming Ukrainian society, which includes the necessity for conscious planning of the process of modernization and rational substantiation of its irreversibility and civilization. Democratic modernization is characterized by a qualitatively higher level of freedom of all subjects of social-power relations, provides real competition of concepts, programs and projects. Competitive preconditions for development include open discourse and the production of new ideas, extraordinary decisions and approaches. Therefore, the development of public administration and, ultimately, of society as a whole, is largely determined by the possibilities of implementing innovative thinking.Recent research and publications analysis of the mentioned problem has been carried out in the context of consideration of personal qualities of representatives of public governance, where the issue of innovative thinking is a key and determinant for the prospects of the social development. It is widely highlighted in contemporary foreign literature (M. Weber, J. Habermas, B. Gurne) and in the national literature (O. Bahrim, L. Kotyk, V. Oluiko, O. Prodius, I. Romanchuk and others).Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The works of these authors raise important aspects of the development of public governance and the importance for it of innovative thinking. However, there is a need to disclose the essence of the innovative thinking of participants in public governance as an intellectual resource of successful activity and a mean of modernizing society. This general objective of the article corresponds to a number of tasks to be solved, in particular, to demonstrate the specific forms of influence of innovative thinking on the modernization of public governance.Paper main body. The article reveals real prerequisites for the modernization of modern society, in particular, the expansion of the circle of active participants in administrative processes and subjects of innovative attitude to existing realities. Therefore, the management practice of solving issues with the necessity includes an individual approach and a special (every time new) attitude to the situation. Under these conditions, ensuring the effectiveness of managerial decisions and all public governance should be based on a creative approach as an implementation of innovative thinking.The content of innovative thinking is clarified by defining the essence of thinking as an attributive function of a person, which necessarily extends to the specifics of managerial activity. Thinking is defined as a reflection – the logical activity of the correlation of one subject of thought with another, or their mutual mediation. Reflection is multidimensional, it can relate to the discovery of the content of various aspects of the activity, for example, the motive and purpose, purpose and means, results and goals, resources and obstacles, etc.In the structure of public management, innovative thinking plays the role of the driving force of modernization or the main mean for producing a new social reality. As a special kind of reflection, it correlates the general regulatory norms with the practical situation, takes into account the set of other faces and as a result is designed in a specific, synthetic and original solution to a particular task. Innovative thinking performs a number of functions, forms both new theoretical concepts of reality and practical models of its real changes.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Thus, innovative thinking is considered as an effective factor for the development of public governance, since it forms the content of theoretical and practical modernizations, produces new projects and development programs. In public administration, it focuses on the continuous modernization of social-power relations, expansion of the objects of reformation and implementation of the capabilities of its subjects. The prospects for further research are to highlight the peculiarities of the formation of innovative thinking, to specify its connection with other productive opportunities of the subject of social and managerial changes and in detailing the process of implementing innovative projects.

Досліджено особливості та сутність інноваційного мислення як чинника розвитку публічного врядування. Обґрунтовано положення про те, що інноваційне мислення є особливим різновидом рефлексії, процесом опосередкування різних граней управління та формування якісно нових результатів діяльності – теоретичних концептів дійсності та практичних моделей її реальних змін. Розкрито низку напрямів і засобів модернізації публічного врядування шляхом запровадження раціональних нововведень. ; Problem setting. An essential feature of Ukrainian nowadays is the process of reforming Ukrainian society, which includes the necessity for conscious planning of the process of modernization and rational substantiation of its irreversibility and civilization. Democratic modernization is characterized by a qualitatively higher level of freedom of all subjects of social-power relations, provides real competition of concepts, programs and projects. Competitive preconditions for development include open discourse and the production of new ideas, extraordinary decisions and approaches. Therefore, the development of public administration and, ultimately, of society as a whole, is largely determined by the possibilities of implementing innovative thinking.Recent research and publications analysis of the mentioned problem has been carried out in the context of consideration of personal qualities of representatives of public governance, where the issue of innovative thinking is a key and determinant for the prospects of the social development. It is widely highlighted in contemporary foreign literature (M. Weber, J. Habermas, B. Gurne) and in the national literature (O. Bahrim, L. Kotyk, V. Oluiko, O. Prodius, I. Romanchuk and others).Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The works of these authors raise important aspects of the development of public governance and the importance for it of innovative thinking. However, there is a need to disclose the essence of the innovative thinking of participants in public governance as an intellectual resource of successful activity and a mean of modernizing society. This general objective of the article corresponds to a number of tasks to be solved, in particular, to demonstrate the specific forms of influence of innovative thinking on the modernization of public governance.Paper main body. The article reveals real prerequisites for the modernization of modern society, in particular, the expansion of the circle of active participants in administrative processes and subjects of innovative attitude to existing realities. Therefore, the management practice of solving issues with the necessity includes an individual approach and a special (every time new) attitude to the situation. Under these conditions, ensuring the effectiveness of managerial decisions and all public governance should be based on a creative approach as an implementation of innovative thinking.The content of innovative thinking is clarified by defining the essence of thinking as an attributive function of a person, which necessarily extends to the specifics of managerial activity. Thinking is defined as a reflection – the logical activity of the correlation of one subject of thought with another, or their mutual mediation. Reflection is multidimensional, it can relate to the discovery of the content of various aspects of the activity, for example, the motive and purpose, purpose and means, results and goals, resources and obstacles, etc.In the structure of public management, innovative thinking plays the role of the driving force of modernization or the main mean for producing a new social reality. As a special kind of reflection, it correlates the general regulatory norms with the practical situation, takes into account the set of other faces and as a result is designed in a specific, synthetic and original solution to a particular task. Innovative thinking performs a number of functions, forms both new theoretical concepts of reality and practical models of its real changes.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. Thus, innovative thinking is considered as an effective factor for the development of public governance, since it forms the content of theoretical and practical modernizations, produces new projects and development programs. In public administration, it focuses on the continuous modernization of social-power relations, expansion of the objects of reformation and implementation of the capabilities of its subjects. The prospects for further research are to highlight the peculiarities of the formation of innovative thinking, to specify its connection with other productive opportunities of the subject of social and managerial changes and in detailing the process of implementing innovative projects.

Reintegration planning and post-conflict management policies largely depend on the form of conflict resolution. At present, it is impossible to predict the form of the end of the Russian-Ukrainian war, so any policy-making activity in this area can only serve as a theoretical basis for the processes that will take place in practice. The article examines the models of post-conflict management within the management process, which is localized within the territory affected by the armed conflict, is considered a resource by various political actors, requires institutional order and overcoming the consequences of the conflict.Strategies for the influence of international and national actors on the management of post-conflict territories have been identified. It is determined that in the post-conflict territories international organizations perform their statutory functions, thus justifying their functioning in the crisis of the system of international law and international relations. Based on the "ideal types" of models of international and national governance, the models of postconflict territory management that can be implemented in Ukraine under certain scenarios are considered. The analysis of four models provided an opportunity to make some generalizations: the Bosnian model – peace at the cost of limiting sovereignty and increasing internal contradictions. The implementation of the Croatian model will lead to serious human, material and image losses in Ukraine. At the same time, the application of the Pakistani model to the temporarily occupied territories will threaten to further fragment Ukraine. The German model is focused on creating favorable conditions in the distant future. According to the criteria of control over the management of post-conflict territory and the ability to exercise this control, the best scenario for the management of deoccupied territories is to develop its own adaptive model that will demonstrate its effectiveness in achieving such a goal as establishing a peaceful, sovereign and ...

Reintegration planning and post-conflict management policies largely depend on the form of conflict resolution. At present, it is impossible to predict the form of the end of the Russian-Ukrainian war, so any policy-making activity in this area can only serve as a theoretical basis for the processes that will take place in practice. The article examines the models of post-conflict management within the management process, which is localized within the territory affected by the armed conflict, is considered a resource by various political actors, requires institutional order and overcoming the consequences of the conflict.Strategies for the influence of international and national actors on the management of post-conflict territories have been identified. It is determined that in the post-conflict territories international organizations perform their statutory functions, thus justifying their functioning in the crisis of the system of international law and international relations. Based on the "ideal types" of models of international and national governance, the models of postconflict territory management that can be implemented in Ukraine under certain scenarios are considered. The analysis of four models provided an opportunity to make some generalizations: the Bosnian model – peace at the cost of limiting sovereignty and increasing internal contradictions. The implementation of the Croatian model will lead to serious human, material and image losses in Ukraine. At the same time, the application of the Pakistani model to the temporarily occupied territories will threaten to further fragment Ukraine. The German model is focused on creating favorable conditions in the distant future. According to the criteria of control over the management of post-conflict territory and the ability to exercise this control, the best scenario for the management of deoccupied territories is to develop its own adaptive model that will demonstrate its effectiveness in achieving such a goal as establishing a peaceful, sovereign and ...

The paper examines the functioning of multilevel governance as a holistic system within a matrix of decentralization. The paper reveals the definitions of «decentralization» and determines the role of decentralization in the mechanism of multilevel governance. The roles of decentralization in a democratic system are studied. The paper analyses the parts of the matrix of decentralization consisting of de-concentration, delegation, devolution, and divestment. The paper also examines the most common types of decentralization (administrative decentralization, political decentralization, economic (market) decentralization, financial decentralization) and horizontal decentralization and vertical decentralization. These types of decentralization are distinguished by subjects and spheres of influence. The dynamics of decentralization matrix is studied in comparison with various stages of Ukraine's independence and in comparison with the neighboring European countries. ; У статті розглядається функціонування багаторівневого управління як цілісної системи в рамках матриці децентралізації. Стаття розкриває поняття «децентралізація» та визначає роль децентралізації в механізмі багаторівневого управління. Досліджено роль децентралізації в демократичній системі. У статті проаналізовано ті частини матриці децентралізації, що складаються з деконцентрації, делегування, деволюції та дивестиції. У статті також розглядаються найпоширеніші типи децентралізації (адміністративна децентралізація, політична децентралізація, економічна (ринкова) децентралізація, фінансова децентралізація) та горизонтальна децентралізація і вертикальна децентралізація. Ці типи децентралізації розрізняють за суб'єктами та сферами впливу. Динаміка матриці децентралізації вивчається порівняно з різними етапами незалежності України та порівняно з сусідніми європейськими країнами.

The paper examines the functioning of multilevel governance as a holistic system within a matrix of decentralization. The paper reveals the definitions of «decentralization» and determines the role of decentralization in the mechanism of multilevel governance. The roles of decentralization in a democratic system are studied. The paper analyses the parts of the matrix of decentralization consisting of de-concentration, delegation, devolution, and divestment. The paper also examines the most common types of decentralization (administrative decentralization, political decentralization, economic (market) decentralization, financial decentralization) and horizontal decentralization and vertical decentralization. These types of decentralization are distinguished by subjects and spheres of influence. The dynamics of decentralization matrix is studied in comparison with various stages of Ukraine's independence and in comparison with the neighboring European countries. ; У статті розглядається функціонування багаторівневого управління як цілісної системи в рамках матриці децентралізації. Стаття розкриває поняття «децентралізація» та визначає роль децентралізації в механізмі багаторівневого управління. Досліджено роль децентралізації в демократичній системі. У статті проаналізовано ті частини матриці децентралізації, що складаються з деконцентрації, делегування, деволюції та дивестиції. У статті також розглядаються найпоширеніші типи децентралізації (адміністративна децентралізація, політична децентралізація, економічна (ринкова) децентралізація, фінансова децентралізація) та горизонтальна децентралізація і вертикальна децентралізація. Ці типи децентралізації розрізняють за суб'єктами та сферами впливу. Динаміка матриці децентралізації вивчається порівняно з різними етапами незалежності України та порівняно з сусідніми європейськими країнами.

Problem setting. "Action plan for the implementation of the Concept of development of the digital economy and society of Ukraine for 2018 – 2020", approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, dated January 17, 2018 № 67-p, determines the necessity of developing and substantiating indices, indicators and methods for assessing digital development of Ukraine accordingly to international development practices. In "Grounds of implementation by executive authorities of the principles of state policy of digital development", approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, dated January 30, 2019 № 56, there is also emphasized the necessity to adhere to such principle of digital governance as "assessment of efficiency and effectiveness". Recent research and publications analysis. The implementation of the trend of digital transformation of public management and administration has become the object of research of many foreign scientists in the field of public administration. Thus, in our opinion, special attention is drawn to the works of the following researchers: P. Dunleavy and H. Margetts; B. Corydon, V. Ganesan and M. Lundqvist, S. Wray. UN experts measuring the E-Government Development Index, the E-Participation Index considered theoretical and practical aspects of e-government implementation, assessed the development of e-government and digital participation at the national level. In Ukraine, the issues of digitalization of public management and administration in general, and its assessment in particular, have been investigated insufficiently, though there are works of leading domestic scientists in which the essence of e-government, its formation and development in Ukraine and worldwide are revealed, and the measuring system of development of information society and e-government is analyzed. In recent years, international organizations have been assessing the development of e-government, e-participation at the national level, a number of initiatives of civil society institutions aimed at determining the effectiveness of some individual e-government tools at the local level has been implemented. Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. However, the unresolved part of the general problem of the research is the theoretical and methodological substantiation of integral evaluation digital governance at the local level. Paper main body. The aim of the article is to scientifically and theoretically substantiate the applying of mathematical methods to assessing of digital governance at the level of local communities, and the main task is to analyze the existing methodology, develop and test a model of integral evaluation digital governance at the local level. Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. The article analyzes the evolution of management model in the public sector and investigates the multi-vector process of digital governance formation in Ukrainian realities. The author prove that assessing of digital governance will increase the reliability of the process of development and decision-making in the management of complex multi-level socio-economic systems, providing an opportunity to assess different strategies of digital transformation. In the article it is substantiated that the conceptual approaches of global indices to assessing the development of digital society and digital governance will be useful for the development of analytical tools adapted to the specifics of the content of digital development of Ukraine at the local level. Proceeding from the necessary precondition of reliability of diagnostic conclusions, the author proposed their own model adapted to the specifics of the level of territorial communities in order to provide full understanding of the level of digitalization of public management and administration at the local level. The proposed mathematical model of integral evaluation digital governance at the local level is open for logical changes and additions. In order to test the developed methodology, the integral evaluation digital governance at the local level was carried out on the example of Vinnytsia city united territorial community during 2014-2018. ; Обґрунтовано, що концептуальні підходи глобальних індексів щодо оцінки розвитку цифрового суспільства та цифрового врядування будуть корисними задля розробки аналітичних інструментів, адаптованих до специфіки контенту цифрового врядування на місцевому рівні. Запропоновано власну модель, адаптовану до специфіки рівня територіальних громад з метою комплексного розуміння рівня цифрового врядування на місцевому рівні. З метою апробації розробленої методики здійснено оцінку цифрового врядування Вінницької міської об'єднаної територіальної громади впродовж 2014-2018 рр. Доведено, що авторська методика дозволяє провести системний аналіз стану цифровізації публічного управління та адміністрування на рівні територіальних громад.

A central issue in this paper is the origins and specific character of global governance discourse that formed at the turn of the twenty-first century. The new discourse marked a gradual exclusion of most early discourses – «international relations» and «world government». It is demonstrated that new term «global governance» signalizes about grand reconstruction of previous international relations discourse where international society was considered as the complex of states and their governments actually. In fact the global governance discourse is pointed case of irreducibility of international society to interstates relations. This is based on the James Rosenau theory of world politics. The James Rosenau contribution to development and conceptualization of term «global governance» was considered.The analysis of sources and meaning of basic approaches to global governance understanding are given much attention. This shows how problematique of global governance and world regulation is articulated in dominant paradigms in world politics: Realism, Liberalism and Marxism. In general, this research shows that global governance discourse developed under influence of theory of transnationalism and concept of 'governing without government', concept of global civil society, international regimes theory, neoliberal institutionalism, balance of power theory, hegemonic stability theory. In this contribution the circle of questions connected with the perspective of research of the global governance concepts was outlined. Further investigations are needed to compare the basic approaches to studies of global governance and world regulation. Particularly, it is worth to concentrate on the difference among approaches to comprehension the following questions: Who, how and on what level can, able and/or must exercise global governance? Is it a result of action of individual actors or characteristic of international system in general? What the shape is global governance taking on the contemporary world and what kind of type is reasonably to label this governance? What are conditions of fair and effective governance? ; Исследованы начала и специфика дискурса глобального управления, сформировавшегося на рубеже ХХ-XXI веков. Рассмотрен вклад Дж. Розенау в разработку и концептуализацию понятия «глобальное управление». Главное внимание уделено анализу истоков и содержания основных подходов к пониманию глобального управления. Намечен круг вопросов, связанных с перспективой исследования концепций глобального управления ; Досліджено витоки та специфіку дискурсу глобального управління, який сформувався на рубежі ХХ-ХХІ століть. Розглянуто внесок Дж. Розенау в розроблення та концептуалізацію поняття «глобальне управління». Головну увагу приділено аналізу джерел та змісту основних підходів до розуміння глобального управління. Окреслено коло питань, пов'язаних з перспективою дослідження концепцій глобального управління

Метою даного дослідження передбачено аналіз організаційної структури управління системою освіти дорослих в Англії на сучасному етапі, розгляд діяльності основних державних підрозділів, що регулюють освіту дорослих, у контексті останніх структурних реформ, ретроспективний огляд загальних напрямів освітньої політики британського уряду в досліджуваній галузі. Результатом публікації є висвітлення векторів сучасних реформаційних процесів у галузі регулювання системи освіти дорослих в Англії, що на практиці дозволяє критично осмислити відповідні реформи в національній системі освіти дорослих. У перспективі доцільно провести детальний аналіз державних та недержавних освітніх програм, орієнтованих на дорослого споживача. ; One of the actual problems facing Ukrainian adult education system of today is the issue of its effective administration to provide better regulation of the mentioned system in order to satisfy the growing educational demands of an adult person in self-realization, social and cultural development, being competitive on the labour market. One of the ways to solve the given problem is to take into account the positive experience of the other developed countries like England where adult education is one of the priorities of the governmental policy. The article is aimed at pointing out the strategic directions of contemporary reforms of adult education in England. Historical analysis of the development of adult education in England proved that state took a minimal part in its regulation. The first step to control the system became "The Education law" (1944) which created the unique national education system with adult education included. Adult education was regulated by two major bodies – central government (The Department of Education and Science) and local government (Local Education Authorities), where the latter took major responsibility. In 1980s the system started to fall down alongside with strengthening the control of the central government. So there were visual evidences that testify to the tendencies of a mixed model of adult education regulation or it is called decentralized centralization. Nowadays the national level of adult education system regulation includes the following bodies: Department for Business, Innovations and Skills, financing bodies – Skills Funding Agency and Higher Education Funding Council for England; inspection bodies –Office for Standards in Education and Quality Assurance Agency – UK-wide (higher adult education); consulting bodies –National Institute of Adult Continuing Learning, UK Commission for Employment and Skills. The responsibilities of the Local education authorities are limited today to school sector only. So we can conclude that today's system of adult education in England is regulated by the central governmental bodies and totally exclude the part of local authorities, and historical tradition of education decentralization has exhausted itself. So, the article resulted in revealing major directions of contemporary adult education reforms in England. In practice it allows to apply critically in national adult education reforms.

Стаття присвячена дослідженню та формуванню засад підготовки, прийняття та реалізації управлінських рішень, на основі аналізу досвіду формування критеріїв оцінювання та впровадження програм оцінювання якості рішень в державному управлінні у Великобританії, Швеції та Фінляндії. В роботі розглянуто теоретико-методологічні підходи формування критеріальної бази оцінювання якості управлінських рішень Проаналізовані їх переваги та слабкі сторони, окреслено напрями розробки вітчизняних підходів до управління якістю рішень в державному управлінні. Обґрунтовується висновок щодо необхідності розробки методики оцінювання якості, яка ґрунтується на чітких і зрозумілих аналітичних критеріях і яка може бути інтегрована в процес прийняття рішень, що дозволить прогнозувати якість рішення ще на етапі його прийняття та в разі необхідності скорегувати його для того, щоб забезпечити досягнення поставлених цілей управління. Подальші дослідження рекомендовано спрямувати на розробку систем підтримки прийняття рішень, які реалізують методики оцінювання державних рішень та забезпечують прийняття рішень з необхідним рівнем якості. Ключові слова: державне управління, процес прийняття управлінських рішень, оцінка якості рішень, якість державного управління ; The article is devoted to research and formation of bases of preparation, acceptance and realization of administrative decisions on the basis of the analysis of experience of formation of criteria of estimation and introduction of programs of an estimation of quality of decisions in public administration in the Great Britain, Sweden and Finland. The paper considers theoretical and methodological approaches to the formation of the criteria base for assessing the quality of management decisions. Their advantages and weaknesses are analyzed, the directions of development of domestic approaches to quality management of decisions in public administration are indicated. The conclusion about the need to develop a methodology for quality assessment based on clear and understandable analytical conditions and which can be integrated into the decision-making process, which will predict the quality of the decision at the stage of its adoption and, if necessary, adjust it to ensure management. Further research is recommended to focus on the development of decision support systems that implement methods for evaluating government decisions and ensure decision-making with the required level of quality.Keywords: public administration, managerial decision-making process, quality assessment of decisions, quality of public administration

Problem setting. The main obstacles to the e-democracy development in Ukraine are the shortcomings inherent in most post-Soviet countries. The main ones are the declarative nature of the regulatory framework, its fragmentation, and sometimes unreasonable copying of international practices. Over the past decade, a significant number of laws and by-laws have been adopted that, to varying degrees, relate to the sphere of e-democracy, but non- consistency, populism and declarativeness negatively affect the dynamics of the e-democracy development in Ukraine.Recent research and publications analysis. Analysis of recent studies and publications revealed the presence of a generalized analysis of the legal support issues in the sphere of e-government. The authors came to the conclusion that insufficient attention has been paid to the issues of the legal mechanism of public management of the development of e-democracy as a separate sphere. Their constant development should be based on scientifically grounded recommendations and require research on this topic.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The purpose of the work is to analyze the state of the legal support mechanism for the e-democracy development in Ukraine, theoretically substantiate its structure, improve the model of the legal mechanism for public management of the e-democracy development and develop recommendations for the authorities to improve it.Paper main body. The paper analyzes the current state of the legal support mechanism for the e-democracy development in Ukraine. Its model in the form of a 4-level hierarchical structure has been theoretically substantiated and formed. The regulation of the Ukraine legislation has been carried out in accordance with the proposed structure and system of criteria. These criteria are defined in the Recommendations of the EU Cabinet of Ministers on e-democracy. The main shortcomings of the current legislation in this area have been proved. The model of the legal mechanism of public administration of the e-democracy development in Ukraine has been improved, which is focused on the legal consolidation of resource support for the e-democracy development. Recommendations for improving the efficiency of the legal mechanism of public administration of the e-democracy development in Ukraine have been developed.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. The model of the mechanism of legal support for the e-democracy development in Ukraine has been theoretically substantiated and formed in the form of a 4-level hierarchical structure. The model has based on the current state analysis of the legal support mechanism of e-democracy development. The system of criteria in order to select laws and by-laws for this structure has proposed in accordance with the goals of e-democracy defined in the Recommendations of the EU Cabinet of Ministers. The shortcomings of the legal framework in the field of e-democracy have highlighted. They are the declarative nature of the current legislation, lack of resource support, incompleteness, inconsistency, ambiguity, insufficient mutual consistency of documents with each other, low degree of consideration of national features of the democratic processes development in the realities of Ukraine.The legal mechanism of public management of the e-democracy development in Ukraine has been improved. The improved legal mechanism differs from the existing one in that it is proposed to additionally include, after the development of conceptual (doctrinal) foundations, the sequence of the procedure for strategic planning, state target programming, budgeting, with the organization of feedback on the results of monitoring, analysis and evaluation of their implementation, as well as possible adjustments related policies, programs and budgets. One of the components of the model provides for the obligation to take into account the results of the work of the Green and White Books mechanisms when creating conceptual documents. These mechanisms are based on the conclusions of the discussion of topical issues by the public, business and government officials.Recommendations to improve the legal mechanism of public administration for the e-democracy development in Ukraine and include: effective use of the Green Paper and White Paper mechanisms; development on their basis of the Strategy for e-democracy and the Program of measures for the implementation of the Strategy; fixing the mandatory financing of the Program in the budget of Ukraine have been developed.Further research will be aimed at improving the organizational, information-analytical, motivational, financial mechanisms of public management of the development of e-democracy in Ukraine. ; Проаналізовано поточний стан механізму правового забезпечення розвитку електронної демократії в Україні, теоретично обґрунтовано та сформовано його модель у вигляді 4-х рівневої ієрархічної структури. Здійснено упорядкування законодавства України відповідно до запропонованої структури та системи критеріїв, визначених у Рекомендаціях Кабінету Міністрів ЄС стосовно електронної демократії. Доведено основні недоліки чинного законодавства в цій сфері. Удосконалено модель правового механізму публічного управління розвитком електронної демократії в Україні, яка орієнтована на юридичне закріплення ресурсного підтримання розвитку електронної демократії. Розроблено рекомендації щодо підвищення ефективності правового механізму публічного управління розвитком електронної демократії в Україні.

Problem setting. The main obstacles to the e-democracy development in Ukraine are the shortcomings inherent in most post-Soviet countries. The main ones are the declarative nature of the regulatory framework, its fragmentation, and sometimes unreasonable copying of international practices. Over the past decade, a significant number of laws and by-laws have been adopted that, to varying degrees, relate to the sphere of e-democracy, but non- consistency, populism and declarativeness negatively affect the dynamics of the e-democracy development in Ukraine.Recent research and publications analysis. Analysis of recent studies and publications revealed the presence of a generalized analysis of the legal support issues in the sphere of e-government. The authors came to the conclusion that insufficient attention has been paid to the issues of the legal mechanism of public management of the development of e-democracy as a separate sphere. Their constant development should be based on scientifically grounded recommendations and require research on this topic.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. The purpose of the work is to analyze the state of the legal support mechanism for the e-democracy development in Ukraine, theoretically substantiate its structure, improve the model of the legal mechanism for public management of the e-democracy development and develop recommendations for the authorities to improve it.Paper main body. The paper analyzes the current state of the legal support mechanism for the e-democracy development in Ukraine. Its model in the form of a 4-level hierarchical structure has been theoretically substantiated and formed. The regulation of the Ukraine legislation has been carried out in accordance with the proposed structure and system of criteria. These criteria are defined in the Recommendations of the EU Cabinet of Ministers on e-democracy. The main shortcomings of the current legislation in this area have been proved. The model of the legal mechanism of public administration of the e-democracy development in Ukraine has been improved, which is focused on the legal consolidation of resource support for the e-democracy development. Recommendations for improving the efficiency of the legal mechanism of public administration of the e-democracy development in Ukraine have been developed.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. The model of the mechanism of legal support for the e-democracy development in Ukraine has been theoretically substantiated and formed in the form of a 4-level hierarchical structure. The model has based on the current state analysis of the legal support mechanism of e-democracy development. The system of criteria in order to select laws and by-laws for this structure has proposed in accordance with the goals of e-democracy defined in the Recommendations of the EU Cabinet of Ministers. The shortcomings of the legal framework in the field of e-democracy have highlighted. They are the declarative nature of the current legislation, lack of resource support, incompleteness, inconsistency, ambiguity, insufficient mutual consistency of documents with each other, low degree of consideration of national features of the democratic processes development in the realities of Ukraine.The legal mechanism of public management of the e-democracy development in Ukraine has been improved. The improved legal mechanism differs from the existing one in that it is proposed to additionally include, after the development of conceptual (doctrinal) foundations, the sequence of the procedure for strategic planning, state target programming, budgeting, with the organization of feedback on the results of monitoring, analysis and evaluation of their implementation, as well as possible adjustments related policies, programs and budgets. One of the components of the model provides for the obligation to take into account the results of the work of the Green and White Books mechanisms when creating conceptual documents. These mechanisms are based on the conclusions of the discussion of topical issues by the public, business and government officials.Recommendations to improve the legal mechanism of public administration for the e-democracy development in Ukraine and include: effective use of the Green Paper and White Paper mechanisms; development on their basis of the Strategy for e-democracy and the Program of measures for the implementation of the Strategy; fixing the mandatory financing of the Program in the budget of Ukraine have been developed.Further research will be aimed at improving the organizational, information-analytical, motivational, financial mechanisms of public management of the development of e-democracy in Ukraine. ; Проаналізовано поточний стан механізму правового забезпечення розвитку електронної демократії в Україні, теоретично обґрунтовано та сформовано його модель у вигляді 4-х рівневої ієрархічної структури. Здійснено упорядкування законодавства України відповідно до запропонованої структури та системи критеріїв, визначених у Рекомендаціях Кабінету Міністрів ЄС стосовно електронної демократії. Доведено основні недоліки чинного законодавства в цій сфері. Удосконалено модель правового механізму публічного управління розвитком електронної демократії в Україні, яка орієнтована на юридичне закріплення ресурсного підтримання розвитку електронної демократії. Розроблено рекомендації щодо підвищення ефективності правового механізму публічного управління розвитком електронної демократії в Україні.