Suchergebnisse

The idea of toleration as the appropriate response to difference has been central to liberal thought since Locke. Although the subject has been widely and variously explored, there has been reluctance to acknowledge the new meaning that current debates on toleration have when compared with those at its origins in the early modern period and with subsequent discussions about pluralism and freedom of expression. This collection starts from a clear recognition of the new terms of the debate. It recognises that a new academic consensus is slowly emerging on a view of tolerance that is reasonable in two senses. Firstly of reflecting the capacity of seeing the other's viewpoint, secondly on the relatively limited extent to which toleration can be granted. It reflects the cross-thematic and cross-disciplinary nature of such discussions, dissecting a number of debates such as liberalism and communitarianism, public and private, multiculturalism and the politics of identity, and a number of disciplines: moral, legal and political philosophy, historical and educational studies, anthropology, sociology and psychology. A group of distinguished authors explore the complexities emerging from the new debate. They scrutinise, with analytical sophistication, the philosophical foundation, the normative content and the broadly political implications of a new culture of toleration for diverse societies. Specific issues considered include the toleration of religious discrimination in employment, city life and community, social ethos, publicity, justice and reason and ethics. The book is unique in resolutely looking forward to the theoretical and practical challenges posed by commitment to a conception of toleration demanding empathy and understanding in an ever-diversifying world.

This paper discusses the concept of toleration as it has been manifested in modern society through two contrasting processes - the prevalence of group identity, and the prevalence of identity defined according to citizenship and individual rights. Referring primarily to the work of political theorist Michael Walzer, the paper describes the historical development of toleration in the U.S., insofar as it is an immigrant nation which has passed through several phases of intolerance and toleration that continue to characterise the dynamics of American society, particularly in the city. Special reference is made to the city of Chicago, the largest city in the Midwest, where immigrants from all over settled, establishing ethnic neighbourhoods. Globalisation and migration have made diversity a defining feature of contemporary society, and cities in particular. The multiplication of identities is being experienced on an individual level as well, giving rise to the recognition of the increasingly 'hybrid' nature of social and personal identification. The paper concludes by calling into question the implications of this post-modern model on the conceptualisation of toleration as well as its manifestations.

This paper approaches the idea of toleration in John Rawls political liberalism. In particular, it is the general theory what is considered, not the application of it to international relations. Enlightening that idea requires to discuss the different meanings of «toleration» as can be distinguish in Rawls liberalism: On the one hand, Rawls relies that those people for whom the political conception of justice is chosen will have the virtue of toleration. This bargaining for that virtue carries citizens duties, as the duty to be reasonable, recognizing the burdens of reason or the duty of civility; obligations that will be briefly examined. On the other hand, toleration appears as a principle of legitimacy in Rawls political liberalism: as a principle that gives us reasons which justify the ends and organization of the basic structure of society. Then, virtue and principle of toleration are complementary but also maintain strained relations. In view of the hierarchy of values that virtue of toleration presupposes, it does not fit appraising that virtue as a basic political one where the principle of toleration rules the foundations of socio-political order. ; En este trabajo se aborda la noción de tolerancia en el liberalismo político de John Rawls en lo que toca a la parte más general de esta teoría, que es la referida a una sociedad política, y no a su extensión a las relaciones internacionales. El esclarecimiento de esta noción ha de hacer frente a la polisemia que afecta al concepto de tolerancia, a la que Rawls no es ajeno. De esta manera, por un lado, se hallará que Rawls cuenta con la virtud de la tolerancia de aquellas personas para quienes se elige la concepción política de la justicia. La expectativa de que los ciudadanos manifiesten tal virtud se expresa en obligaciones de éstos --como la de ser razonables, reconocer las cargas del juicio o cumplir con el deber de civilidad-, las cuales son examinadas someramente. Pero también, en el liberalismo político, la tolerancia aparece como un principio de legitimidad; como un principio discriminador de las razones susceptibles de justificar los fines y la organización de la estructura básica de la sociedad. Virtud y principio mantienen una relación de complementariedad, pero también cierta tensión. Y es que, dada la jerarquía de valores presupuesta por la virtud de la tolerancia, resulta problemático considerar tal virtud como un valor político básico allí donde el principio de tolerancia rige sobre los fundamentos del orden sociopolítico.

Includes bibliographical references and index. ; militias / David E. Boeyink -- Pragmatic liberalism and the press in violent times / Edmund B. Lambeth -- Protecting wider purposes: hate speech, communication, and the international community / David Goldberg -- Riding the electronic tiger: censorship in global, distributed networks / J. Michael Jaffe. ; The legacy of Yitzhak Rabin / Lea Rabin -- The cost of communicative tolerance / Frederick Schauer -- Protest and tolerance: legal values and the control of public-order policing / David Feldman -- Freedom of speech and political violence / Owen Fiss -- Boundaries of freedom of expression before and after Prime Minister Rabin's assassination / Raphael Cohen-Almagor -- The dual threat to modern citizenship: liberal indifference and nonconsensual violence / Harvey Chisick -- The paradox of Israeli civil disobedience and political revolt in light of the Jewish tradition / Sam Lehman-Wilzig -- Should hate speech be free speech? John Stuart Mill and the limits of tolerance / L.W. Sumner -- Holocaust denial, equality, and harm: boundaries of liberty and tolerance in a liberal democracy / Irwin Cotler -- The regulation of racist expression / Richard Moon -- Freedom of the press and terrorism / Joseph Eliot Magnet -- Reporting on political extremists in the United States: the unabomber, the Ku Klux Klan, and the ; Mode of access: Internet.

The author claims: 1) in Spinoza a classical idea of toleration, if traceable, has a marginal role: no logic of concession, the one that (in Thomas' conception) allows the prince to resign to the different cults just like one may resign to the human vices and sins; and no toleration as an intermediate claim, in view of a fuller acknowledgement of the individual rights (Locke, Voltaire); 2) in Spinoza there is a clear idea of an underlying "patience", which lays under political power; a kind of "continuous low", with variations that become decisive within the raising of the «imperium»: a most peculiar and original thesis that originates from the core of Spinoza's political thought, and that reverses the traditional roles of "tolerant" and "tolerated", of one and many, of governor and multitudo.

The question of the state's role in the control of sponsorship of education is addressed in the light of liberal political principles designed to keep peace and enforce toleration in culturally diverse societies. Some contemporary, self-described liberal philosophers argue for a much more substantial educational role for the state than liberal principles will really allow. Brian Barry's argument for that role assumes that the state can prescribe answers to controversial questions regarding the truth and the good life in which a truly liberal state would take no interest. Stephen Macedo is more accommodating to religious diversity than Barry, but his argument fails because of his rashly optimistic view of the state's effectiveness in promoting civic virtue and the possibility of reconciling that role with fundamental liberal values. Liberal regimes do not depend on civic education, even under conditions of diversity. Their life-blood is toleration and dissent rather than the widespread diffusion of civic virtue.

Based on over six years of fieldwork, Sandra L. Faiman-Silva's The Courage to Connect traces the transformation of the well-known Cape Cod community of Provincetown from its nineteenth century origins a Portuguese fishing town to its present status as a welcoming, sexually diverse tourist enclave. This book critically examines the history of the Portuguese ethnic community and the local economy, as well as the nature of intersections between gay and straight culture in areas such as public education, local government, and the police. Using queer and critical culture theory to deconstruct day-to-day local encounters, it lays bare the roots of social conflicts and how they can be resolved. Capturing the pathos and joy of a community that has struggled to accommodate radical social changes, The Courage to Connect serves as a model for understanding how communities can construct themselves to overcome their differences. ; https://vc.bridgew.edu/fac_books/1054/thumbnail.jpg

When Roger Williams, the founder of Rhode Island, and the founder of religious toleration in what was to become the United States of America, examined the charter that King James I had given the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England, he found in that document two significant misstatements. Williams first pointed out the falsity of the recital wherein the King "blessed God that he was the first Christian Prince that had discovered this land."' He then denounced the royal land grant to the Massachusetts Bay Company, because that land belonged, not to the King, but to the Native Americans who lived in that area. Accordingly, Roger Williams asserted that the monarch had told "a solemn public lie."

Liberalism and multicultural constitutionalism are on a collision course destined to become the next great battlefield in the unfolding odyssey of American constitutional law. The impending battle will define the scope and limits of liberal constitutionalism and its role as the model for democracy around the world. While turbulence between liberalism and multicultural constitutionalism occurs across a panoply of controversies, the eye of the storm focuses on one central question: Can liberalism tolerate non-liberal cultures? This article explores the hypothesis that liberalism's deep structure precludes it from explaining and justifying the toleration of non-liberal cultures. If so, this hypothesis has serious implications concerning the viability of liberal multicultural constitutionalism. Either liberalism must be radically reconceived or abandoned, or we must revise our conviction that multicultural constitutionalism is normatively desirable.

This paper aims to examine one of the most important issues in the international corporate laws, which is the issue of share repurchases known as treasury shares. This paper investigated corporate laws, stock exchange regulations, research literatures and stock trading volume for repurchase activities. Covering a sample of thirty-five countries developed and emerging markets. The study found that there is an increasing movement in the world stock market towards adopting or deregulating the share repurchase activities, More than half of the selected sample witnessed a change in the related laws (especially corporate laws) of share repurchases during the period 1995 to 2000. Moreover, there is a toleration to use the treasury share in enhancing the stock market during stock crises and extraordinary market price volatility. Based on upon findings, a modal has been suggested and articulated to be considered as a stabilization instrument for stock marketing.

Dominique Kounkou ed. ; International audience ; The author examines the law of 1905 parting the cults and the State and shows that the French laïcity (a kind of twin toleration) do allow a religious pluralism in France and that it cannot be used as a tool for the eradication of the estalished churches and the minor religious groups a some anticultists say. The author quotes notorious jurists like the professor Jacques Robert and the Dean Carbonnier who have a liberal understanding of the Law of 1905. ; L'auteur montre que la loi de 1905 qui fonde en droit la laïcité française autorise le pluralisme religieux. Elle ne peut être utilisée comme un instrument destiné à éradiquer les Eglises et les groupes religieux minoritaires comme tendent à le faire croire les opposants aux secte de la tendance "laïques de combat". L'auteur cite les juristes Jacques Robert et le Doyen Carbonnier à l'appui de sa thèse.

Dominique Kounkou ed. ; International audience ; The author examines the law of 1905 parting the cults and the State and shows that the French laïcity (a kind of twin toleration) do allow a religious pluralism in France and that it cannot be used as a tool for the eradication of the estalished churches and the minor religious groups a some anticultists say. The author quotes notorious jurists like the professor Jacques Robert and the Dean Carbonnier who have a liberal understanding of the Law of 1905. ; L'auteur montre que la loi de 1905 qui fonde en droit la laïcité française autorise le pluralisme religieux. Elle ne peut être utilisée comme un instrument destiné à éradiquer les Eglises et les groupes religieux minoritaires comme tendent à le faire croire les opposants aux secte de la tendance "laïques de combat". L'auteur cite les juristes Jacques Robert et le Doyen Carbonnier à l'appui de sa thèse.

Societal spheres in the light of history A division of society into statecraft, economy, and civil society is found in Plato's Republic. Its theoretical base is the differentiated and sometimes contradictory norms for these spheres. The mainstream of European structuration is traced from the 'two swords' - state and church - that structured western European society in the Middle Ages to the six societal spheres (or cardinal institutions) of society - the economy, government, science, religion, ethics, and art - that are visible today. Each maintain a large measure of independence (Weber's Eigengesetzlichkeit). Each is dependent on a special type of freedom: civic liberties, free trade, academic freedom, religious toleration, the right to follow one's conscience, artistic license. The paper pauses in this differentiation process at special junctures: the English revolution, the emergence of the Latin American and North American societies, the evolution of modem society as an underpinning of democracy, the emergence of the European Union, and the post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe. ; Sociologisk Forsknings digitala arkiv

The New Atlantis has fired the imaginations of its readers since its original appearance in 1627. Often regarded as the apotheosis of Bacon's ideas through its depiction of an advanced 'scientific' society, it is also read as a seminal work of science fiction. Standing at the threshold of early modern culture, this key text incorporates the practical and visionary, utility and utopia. This volume of eight new essays by leading scholars provides a stimulating dialogue between a range of critical perspectives. Encompassing the fields of cultural history, history of science, literature and politics, the collection explores The New Atlantis' complex location within Bacon's oeuvre and its negotiations with cultural debates of the past and present. Contributors consider the book's use of rhetoric, its narrative contexts, its political and ethical implications, its relation to the natural knowledge of the period, and the function of miracles in New Atlantan society. The politics of colonialism and Jewish toleration, its complex representation of gender, and the role and politics of censorship are also explored. This volume will be the ideal companion to Bacon's The New Atlantis and for all students of literature, politics, history, cultural history and history of science.

Liberalizm uzun süre sosyo-kültürel çeşitlilik (çoğulculuk) meselesine en iyi cevap olarak düşünüldü. Zarar İlkesi sınırları içinde bir hoşgörü fikrine dayanan liberal müdahale etmeme modeli ve sosyo-kültürel farklılıklar karşısında devletin yansızlığı fikrine ve herkes için bir eşit (formel) vatandaşlık hâk ve özgürlükleri sistemi ilkesine dayanan liberal ayrımcılık yapmama modeli, geleneksel olarak, sosyo-kültürel çeşitliliği düzenlemenin en iyi yolu olarak görülegeldi. Ancak, ethno-kültürel grupların kültürel kimliklerinin tanınması ve ifadesine yönelik son zamanlardaki talepleri bu görüşü tartışılır kılıyor ve bu geleneksel liberal politikaların, sosyo-kültürel farklılıkları farklı hak ve muamaleler biçiminde tanıyan bir politika lehine aşılmasının düşünülmesi gerektiğine işaret ediyor. Bu makalede, geleneksel liberal müdahale etmeme ve ayrımcılık yapmama politikalarının, son zamanlarda ortaya çıkan bu kültürel taleplerle uygun bir biçimde başa çıkmaya yeterli olup, olmadıkları tartışılıyor. ; Liberalisin has long been thought as the best answer to the issue of socio-cultural diversity (pluralısm). The liberal non-interference model, which is based on an idea of toleration within the limits of fethe Harrn Principle, and the liberal non-discrimination model, which is based on an idea of state neutrality to socio-cultural differences and a principle of a system of equal (formal) citizenship rights and liberties for all, paye traditionally been seen the best way to accommodate socio-cultural diversity. Hovvever, the recent idemand of ethno-cultural groups for the recognition and expression of their cultural identities challenges this view, suggesting transcending these traditional liberal policies in favour of one that recognizes socio-cultural differences in the forms of different rights and treatments. This paper discusses whether the traditional liberal policies of non-interference and non-discrimination are suffıcient to properly deal with these recent cultural demands. Shovving that neither approach is suffıcient to meet these demands, the paper concludes that liberal needs to develop new approaches to the issue of socio-cultural diversity, and the recent developments in liberal multiculturalism are a result of this awareness.