The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
Alternatively, you can try to access the desired document yourself via your local library catalog.
If you have access problems, please contact us.
In: Quellen und Studien zur Philosophie 109
Doubts have long circulated regarding the intellectual honesty of everyday ethical discourse. Such doubts primarily relate to two of the fundamental assumptions underlying ethical discourse. First: Ethical judgments are truth-apt. Second: Ethical claimsare claims ofreason. The author offers a new line of defense for these assumptions. The principal reference points in his argument are the language philosophy approaches of Ludwig Wittgenstein and Robert Brandon. The thesis promoted by the book is that once we understand pragmaticfeatures oflanguage, several of the most troubling concerns in moral philosophyvanish on their own accord. Matthias Kiesselbach, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Report Issue