Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies
In: Child Care in Practice, Volume 21, Issue 3, p. 297-298
ISSN: 1476-489X
5 results
Sort by:
In: Child Care in Practice, Volume 21, Issue 3, p. 297-298
ISSN: 1476-489X
In: Child Care in Practice, Volume 21, Issue 1, p. 22-32
ISSN: 1476-489X
In: Gendered perspectives on international development: GPID, Volume 1, Issue 1, p. vii-xiv
ISSN: 1947-4776
In: Davidson , G , Irvine , R , Corman , M , Kee , F , Kelly , B , Leavey , G & McNamee , C 2017 , Measuring the Quality of Life of People with Disabilities and their Families: Scoping Study Final Report . Department for Communities , Belfast .
The Scoping Study was initiated in response to the Programme for Government 2016-2021 indicator, 'Improve the quality of life for people with disabilities and their families'. The Disability Research Network was approached to assist the Department for Communities in the development of this indicator. The scoping study included 5 objectives: (1) To review the international literature on quality of life (QoL) measurements for people with disabilities and their families; (2) To develop recommendations for key definitions; (3) To assess existing and emerging data sources for potential use; (4) To develop recommendations for a preferred option; and (5) To test the recommended QoL measure.
BASE
In: Webb , P , Davidson , G , Edge , R , Falls , D , Keenan , F , Kelly , B , McLaughlin , A , Montgomery , L , Mulvenna , C , Norris , B , Owens , A & Irvine , R S 2020 , ' Key components of supporting and assessing decision making ability ' , International Journal of Law and Psychiatry , vol. 72 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101613
People's ability to make decisions may be impaired for a wide range of reasons, including by mental health problems and learning disabilities. Individual autonomy, the ability to make decisions about our own lives, is a fundamental tenet of democratic societies. This has been reinforced by laws governing substitute and supported decision making and most significantly by the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD). Article 12 of the UNCRPD requires everyone to have equal recognition before the law and, to achieve this, the necessary support and safeguards must be available. There has been considerable debate about the important theoretical and philosophical issues involved and growing research about the practice complexities of supporting and assessing decision making ability or mental capacity. This article aims to present some of the key components of the support and assessment process to inform further service development and training in this area. The key components were identified as part of a qualitative, participatory research project which explored the decision making experiences of people with mental health problems and/or learning disabilities. The conventional approach to the assessment of capacity is to consider four main components, whether the person is able to: understand, retain, use and weigh, and communicate the information needed to make the decision at that time. The findings from this research study suggest that people generally don't usually talk about their experiences of decision making in terms of these four components and approaches to supporting people to make decisions don't necessarily break the support down to explicitly address the assessment process. However, considering support for all aspects of the functional test may be helpful to ensure it is as comprehensive as possible. The challenges involved in providing effective support and assessing decision making ability are discussed and the article concludes with some of the implications for training, service development and practice.
BASE