Concepts and operationalisation of reproductive decisions implementation in Austria, Germany and Switzerland

In: Comparative population studies: CPoS ; open acess journal of the Federal Institute for Population Research = Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungsforschung, Band 36, Heft 2-3, S. 495-530

Abstract

Recently the difference between actual and hypothetical fertility (fertility gap)
has served as an indication to enforce family policies with the purpose to increase
births. This paper examines the relevance of hypothetical fertility measured with
fertility ideals and intentions, to the estimation of the gap. Based on a literature
review we discuss the meaning of these concepts and their operationalisation with
empirical observations in three German-speaking countries (Austria, Germany, and Switzerland).
Although the concept of societal ideal fertility is ambiguous it can be useful for
understanding reproductive decisions when measured scrupulously. Operationalisation
of short-term and long-term fertility intentions is discussed, along with their realisation.
Analyses of intentions should rest on a theoretical background, such as the Miller-Pasta
framework and the socio-psychological theory of planned behaviour. The latter is implemented
in Austria and Germany using GGS data. The paper concludes that the fertility gap
can be misleading both because the indicator of actual fertility as well as indicators
of intended fertility can be imprecise. Useful policy-relevant information can be
received by a specific form of the gap, when realisation of individual short-term
intentions is considered.