Suchergebnisse

Problem setting. Public administration in Ukraine is an integral part of social system, but it needs to be modernized efficiently. This implies the need for a deep understanding of the current situation and a thorough analysis of the main factors of this development, especially socio-cultural ones.Recent research and publications analysis. Laws, principles and factors of choice, which are characteristic of administrative processes, particularly public administration, have been researched in numerous works of modern Ukrainian scientists, such as V. Atamanchuk, E. Afonin, V. Bakumenko, V. Knyazev, Y. Kovbasyuk, A. Kolodiy, A. Lipentsev, P. Petrovsky, Yu. Surmin.The question of the importance, or even the priority of the influence of socio-cultural factors on all processes of development of social life, has been raised by such famous thinkers as M. Weber, P. Sorokin, M. Crozier, P. Bourdieu, M. Halbvachs, and G. Hofstede.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. Public administration is a new area in the humanitarian cycle of Ukrainian science. It is multidisciplinary in nature, and it is new because of the dramatic changes that are taking place in post-totalitarian society. Most of the scientific and theoretical studies during all years of independence were conducted within the framework of the scientific field, which inherited all theoretical and methodological installations of Soviet science. Its main task was to assert and strengthen the stability of the management system on the basis of Marx's theory of ideas, according to which the socio-economic factors of society were considered crucial. Therefore, the purpose of this scientific article is to substantiate the priority role of socio-cultural factors in the process of development of public administration in Ukraine.Paper main body. The article focuses on the idea that socio-cultural factors underlying social development perform the integral function in society. The author uses the concepts of "social space" and "social dynamics" by P. Sorokin, "social field" by P. Bourdieu and the ideas of Max Weber and Michel Crozier about a crucial role of raising the level of culture in society and the development of individual personality.The market economy is based on the activity of a man, an active creator of culture, and requires the development of such important qualities as initiative and responsibility. The processes of democratic development involve consideration of the problem of political activity, the formation of relevant political institutions, the legal system and an integrated system of public administration. Both economic and political processes are socio-cultural by their nature. They function effectively through a system of social interconnections or social capital, according to Pierre Bourdieu. The main driving force of both economic and political development is a human resource. The level of education and cultural development in general is a determining factor in all processes of social dynamics, including the economic and political subsystems.The author offers his own classification of the main socio-cultural factors influencing the development of public administration on the basis of all aforementioned ideas. In her opinion, the historical factor is at the heart of any process of society. Understanding the complex social system at the present stage of existence of the Ukrainian state and the system of public administration, in particular, is impossible without a deep historical excursion and analysis of the processes of formation of public consciousness.The following three factors in the classification are grouped into a subgroup called "social and psychological base of public administration". The three main components of this socio-psychological base are: 1) mentality, 2) collective memory, 3) national and cultural identity. The author defines mentality as a special way of thinking inherent in a particular community and as a system of values, according to which people live, collective memory as an active past that shapes national identity on the basis of social traditions, values and ideals of the social group with which people identify themselves. This leads to the conclusion that cultural and national identity, formed in a certain socio-cultural environment, is based on a conscious choice and depends on the rational awareness of the individual, ethnic group, nation of shared historical, political, and civic values.This group of factors directly influences the formation of the worldview of the society, which is a defining socio-cultural factor at a higher, visible level. Its core is a certain value coordinate system through which the civic culture of society is laid, the specificity of economic activity is manifested and social capital is formed. They directly influence the system of public administration in the complex of social interaction defining its quality. This means that they are the main socio-cultural factors for its development at the functional level.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. The main conclusion of this scientific article is that socio-cultural factors play a leading role in the overall impact on the development of society and the public administration in particular. Cultural qualities formed in the course of historical development are manifested in all achievements of human civilization, which all form a socio-cultural space, characterized by its own original mentality, collective memory and national-cultural identity. The next factor is our own public outlook with a unique value system formed on this basis. It manifests itself at the level of social interaction in society and directly influences the formation and quality of public administration through the action of socio-cultural factors such as civic culture, economic activity and social capital. ; Проаналізовано основні чинники впливу у системі соціальних детермінант. Доведено, що пріоритетними за силою впливу на розвиток публічного управління є соціокультурні чинники. Розроблено авторську модель соціокультурної матриці відповідно до синергетичної моделі розвитку суспільства як відкритої системи. Обґрунтовано вагомість таких соціокультурних чинників на розвиток публічного управління: історичний чинник, ментальність, колективна пам'ять, національно-культурна ідентичність; світогляд із ціннісною системою координат, громадянська культура, економічна активність, соціальний капітал.

Problem setting. Public administration in Ukraine is an integral part of social system, but it needs to be modernized efficiently. This implies the need for a deep understanding of the current situation and a thorough analysis of the main factors of this development, especially socio-cultural ones.Recent research and publications analysis. Laws, principles and factors of choice, which are characteristic of administrative processes, particularly public administration, have been researched in numerous works of modern Ukrainian scientists, such as V. Atamanchuk, E. Afonin, V. Bakumenko, V. Knyazev, Y. Kovbasyuk, A. Kolodiy, A. Lipentsev, P. Petrovsky, Yu. Surmin.The question of the importance, or even the priority of the influence of socio-cultural factors on all processes of development of social life, has been raised by such famous thinkers as M. Weber, P. Sorokin, M. Crozier, P. Bourdieu, M. Halbvachs, and G. Hofstede.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. Public administration is a new area in the humanitarian cycle of Ukrainian science. It is multidisciplinary in nature, and it is new because of the dramatic changes that are taking place in post-totalitarian society. Most of the scientific and theoretical studies during all years of independence were conducted within the framework of the scientific field, which inherited all theoretical and methodological installations of Soviet science. Its main task was to assert and strengthen the stability of the management system on the basis of Marx's theory of ideas, according to which the socio-economic factors of society were considered crucial. Therefore, the purpose of this scientific article is to substantiate the priority role of socio-cultural factors in the process of development of public administration in Ukraine.Paper main body. The article focuses on the idea that socio-cultural factors underlying social development perform the integral function in society. The author uses the concepts of "social space" and "social dynamics" by P. Sorokin, "social field" by P. Bourdieu and the ideas of Max Weber and Michel Crozier about a crucial role of raising the level of culture in society and the development of individual personality.The market economy is based on the activity of a man, an active creator of culture, and requires the development of such important qualities as initiative and responsibility. The processes of democratic development involve consideration of the problem of political activity, the formation of relevant political institutions, the legal system and an integrated system of public administration. Both economic and political processes are socio-cultural by their nature. They function effectively through a system of social interconnections or social capital, according to Pierre Bourdieu. The main driving force of both economic and political development is a human resource. The level of education and cultural development in general is a determining factor in all processes of social dynamics, including the economic and political subsystems.The author offers his own classification of the main socio-cultural factors influencing the development of public administration on the basis of all aforementioned ideas. In her opinion, the historical factor is at the heart of any process of society. Understanding the complex social system at the present stage of existence of the Ukrainian state and the system of public administration, in particular, is impossible without a deep historical excursion and analysis of the processes of formation of public consciousness.The following three factors in the classification are grouped into a subgroup called "social and psychological base of public administration". The three main components of this socio-psychological base are: 1) mentality, 2) collective memory, 3) national and cultural identity. The author defines mentality as a special way of thinking inherent in a particular community and as a system of values, according to which people live, collective memory as an active past that shapes national identity on the basis of social traditions, values and ideals of the social group with which people identify themselves. This leads to the conclusion that cultural and national identity, formed in a certain socio-cultural environment, is based on a conscious choice and depends on the rational awareness of the individual, ethnic group, nation of shared historical, political, and civic values.This group of factors directly influences the formation of the worldview of the society, which is a defining socio-cultural factor at a higher, visible level. Its core is a certain value coordinate system through which the civic culture of society is laid, the specificity of economic activity is manifested and social capital is formed. They directly influence the system of public administration in the complex of social interaction defining its quality. This means that they are the main socio-cultural factors for its development at the functional level.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. The main conclusion of this scientific article is that socio-cultural factors play a leading role in the overall impact on the development of society and the public administration in particular. Cultural qualities formed in the course of historical development are manifested in all achievements of human civilization, which all form a socio-cultural space, characterized by its own original mentality, collective memory and national-cultural identity. The next factor is our own public outlook with a unique value system formed on this basis. It manifests itself at the level of social interaction in society and directly influences the formation and quality of public administration through the action of socio-cultural factors such as civic culture, economic activity and social capital. ; Проаналізовано основні чинники впливу у системі соціальних детермінант. Доведено, що пріоритетними за силою впливу на розвиток публічного управління є соціокультурні чинники. Розроблено авторську модель соціокультурної матриці відповідно до синергетичної моделі розвитку суспільства як відкритої системи. Обґрунтовано вагомість таких соціокультурних чинників на розвиток публічного управління: історичний чинник, ментальність, колективна пам'ять, національно-культурна ідентичність; світогляд із ціннісною системою координат, громадянська культура, економічна активність, соціальний капітал.

The article sets out to explore the process of decision-making in the European Union. The research focuses on constraints, which stipulates decision-making procedures in the system of European governance. Taking the concept of multi-level governance as the basic methodological approach an attempt of constructing the research model of decision-making in the European Union is presented. ; В рамках статьи исследуется процессуальный аспект принятия решений в Европейском Союзе. Внимание уделяется выявлению факторов, оказывающих влияние на процедуру разработки политических решений в системе общеевропейского управления. На основе использования концепции многоуровневого управления, в качестве базового методологического похода, представлена попытка разработки исследовательской модели для анализа процесса формирования решений в Европейском Союзе. ; У межах статті досліджується процесуальний аспект ухвалення рішень в Європейському Союзі. Увагу приділено виявленню чинників, що впливають на процедуру вироблення політичних рішень в системі загальноєвропейського врядування. На основі використання концепції багаторівневого управління, в якості базового методологічного підходу, представлена спроба розробки дослідницької моделі для аналізу процесу творення рішень в Європейському Союзі.

The article sets out to explore the process of decision-making in the European Union. The research focuses on constraints, which stipulates decision-making procedures in the system of European governance. Taking the concept of multi-level governance as the basic methodological approach an attempt of constructing the research model of decision-making in the European Union is presented. ; В рамках статьи исследуется процессуальный аспект принятия решений в Европейском Союзе. Внимание уделяется выявлению факторов, оказывающих влияние на процедуру разработки политических решений в системе общеевропейского управления. На основе использования концепции многоуровневого управления, в качестве базового методологического похода, представлена попытка разработки исследовательской модели для анализа процесса формирования решений в Европейском Союзе. ; У межах статті досліджується процесуальний аспект ухвалення рішень в Європейському Союзі. Увагу приділено виявленню чинників, що впливають на процедуру вироблення політичних рішень в системі загальноєвропейського врядування. На основі використання концепції багаторівневого управління, в якості базового методологічного підходу, представлена спроба розробки дослідницької моделі для аналізу процесу творення рішень в Європейському Союзі.

The article examines the impact of globalization on the activities of states. One of the main driving forces of global change is a multinational company with significant resources to influence national governments. Rapidly changing role of the nation state. The classic functions of managing the reduced and modi-fied, gaining other content concepts such as sovereignty, democracy and civil society. In today's world they are seen as aspects of global governance and carry features supranational phenomena.The changing role of the state in the era of globalization has become the political elite of world awareness of the necessity of new realities determine the vector of the future global development. The era of nation states ends and today should begin to think about not only economic, but also political integration. And it's not only the restructuring of state control and its adaptation to globalization processes, but also about fundamental changes in governance in general. The first effects of the free functioning of financial markets in the early twenty-first century. on the world scale were far from encouraging.The financial collapse of 2008 has had a painful effect on the economy of almost all countries of the world, forcing us to reflect on the need to create not only national but also supranational international systems of economic regulation.Since the role of national powers weakens or just changes, who can replace them in order to stabilize economic and social processes around the world? How to create a "concern of states" capable of successfully fulfilling not only purely political but also socio-economic functions? So far, the problem of the relationship between business and politics at the global level remains unresolved, and the discussion shows that not only in practice, but also in the theory of unambiguous answers to these questions is not.Changing the role of the state in the era of globalization puts the world's political elite in front of the need for awareness of new realities, the definition of ...

Problem setting. The formation and development of Ukraine as a democratic state, its integration into the world and European structures requires a rethinking of the nature, place and role of public administration under the current conditions at the enterprises of the transport and road complex. The legislation of Ukraine defines the purpose and tasks of the public administration in the field of transport on the principles enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine and sufficiently covered in the legal literature.Along with fuel and energy and raw material complexes, metallurgy, the military industry, transport is a sector of the economy, critical in terms of meeting public needs and ensuring the sustainable operation of the economic complex as a whole. This is reflected in the following:– implementation of transport projects directly touches on the issues of development of productive powers and populated areas, use of natural resources, expenditures of budgets of all levels. Transport infrastructure is one of the most fundraising sectors of the national economy;– transport is objectively an area of increased technogenic risk and increased vulnerability to terrorist attacks. Transport is the second most important source of environmental pollution after energy and one of the main consumers of insoluble natural resources;– decision in the field of transport development is one of the priorities of the state;– wrong decisions in the field of transport development can lead to irreversible negative consequences, disturb the stability of socio-economic development and have threats to the national security of Ukraine.Therefore, the coverage of the main priorities of the national public administration in the field of transport are and will remain relevant.Recent research and publications analysis. Scientific works of V. Andresyuk, L. Artyushin, A. Galchinsky, B. Gurne, Zh. Ziter, O. Ignatenko, V. Lisnichi, A. Lozhachevskaya, G. Mishchenko, V. Opryshko, M. Onishchuk, I. Pakhomov, Y. Paschenko, V. Razvadovsky, V. Ryzhikh, A. Savchenko, A. Semenchenko, V. Skuratovsky, D. Timokhi, A. Tkachenko, V. Yurchishin are important for the study of the problem of state control of transport systems.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. A necessary prerequisite for the reliable and efficient functioning of the transport industry is the awareness of the importance of transport for the national security of Ukraine, as well as for the interests of society and every citizen, by representatives of the state authorities and the public. In the difficult conditions of world economic processes in Ukraine and European integration, effective public administration of the transport industry is needed, which would take into account geopolitical aspects in the country, the features of the industry and its role in the processes of economic and social transformations, and would enable its development, ensure competitiveness. That is why the issues of public administration in the transport sector need improvement.Paper main body. The state management of transport activity is carried out by conducting and implementing economic (tax, financial, credit, tariff, investment) and social policies, including provision of subsidies for passenger transportation. The basis of public administration of the transport system is a unified transport policy of Ukraine, which must be closely coordinated with the strategy of socio-economic development of the country.Governing bodies exert managerial influence through legal methods that understand the way management functions are performed in accordance with the requirements of applicable law and legal doctrine. The organizational and legal basis of public transport management is the system of state authorities and local self-government, endowed with managerial competence for transport of Ukraine.Management of the transport system of Ukraine is carried out on a branch-territorial basis. Structural reforms in transport aim at developing and improving market relations, reducing the direct involvement of the state in transport and reducing the monopoly sector.The main purpose of public administration is to exercise executive power, in the process of which the tasks, functions and interests of the state are realized. However, direct management of economic, socio-cultural and administrative-political activities is characterized by administrative activities.The state transport management of Ukraine is based on relevant legal framework, which is divided into regulatory and organizational law.Public administration in the field of transport is carried out by: the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, local Councils of People's Deputies and other specially authorized bodies in accordance with their competence.The Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, the activity of which is directed and coordinated by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, is the main body in the system of central bodies of executive power, which ensures the implementation of the state policy in the field of transport, in the sphere of using the Ukrainian airspace and navigation and hydrographic navigation.Let's briefly consider the main priorities of public administration in the main modes of transport.The State Railway Administration (Ukrzaliznytsia) is a public administration body for public use and a legal entity and reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure.The State Aviation Transport Department (Ukraviatrans) is a public administration body that reports to and acts within the Ministry of Infrastructure.The State Department of Maritime and River Transport (Ukrmorrichflot) is a public administration body in the field of maritime and inland waterway transport, which reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure and operates within it.The State Department of Road Transport (Ukravtotrans) is a public administration body in the field of road transport and operates within and reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine.Public administration in the field of pipeline transport is carried out by the Ministry of Fuel and Energy of Ukraine, as well as local state executive authorities and local self-government bodies within their competence.The governing bodies may exercise only those powers which are within their competence. In the process of exercising their competence, management bodies have the right to issue normative acts, which can be attributed to a legal type of management activity.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. 1. The priorities of public administration in the field of transport are the improvement (reorganization) of organizational-power, executive-administrative activity of public administration bodies.2. The priority functions of public administration in the field of transport are the external manifestation of the properties of the management entity.3. The priority areas of the national public administration system in the field of transport are to improve and align the basic functions of the transport industry with European standards.The prospects for further exploration are the improvement of public administration in all modes of transport, taking into account the entry into the European transport system. Problem setting. The formation and development of Ukraine as a democratic state, its integration into the world and European structures requires a rethinking of the nature, place and role of public administration under the current conditions at the enterprises of the transport and road complex. The legislation of Ukraine defines the purpose and tasks of the public administration in the field of transport on the principles enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine and sufficiently covered in the legal literature.Along with fuel and energy and raw material complexes, metallurgy, the military industry, transport is a sector of the economy, critical in terms of meeting public needs and ensuring the sustainable operation of the economic complex as a whole. This is reflected in the following:– implementation of transport projects directly touches on the issues of development of productive powers and populated areas, use of natural resources, expenditures of budgets of all levels. Transport infrastructure is one of the most fundraising sectors of the national economy;– transport is objectively an area of increased technogenic risk and increased vulnerability to terrorist attacks. Transport is the second most important source of environmental pollution after energy and one of the main consumers of insoluble natural resources;– decision in the field of transport development is one of the priorities of the state;– wrong decisions in the field of transport development can lead to irreversible negative consequences, disturb the stability of socio-economic development and have threats to the national security of Ukraine.Therefore, the coverage of the main priorities of the national public administration in the field of transport are and will remain relevant.Recent research and publications analysis. Scientific works of V. Andresyuk, L. Artyushin, A. Galchinsky, B. Gurne, Zh. Ziter, O. Ignatenko, V. Lisnichi, A. Lozhachevskaya, G. Mishchenko, V. Opryshko, M. Onishchuk, I. Pakhomov, Y. Paschenko, V. Razvadovsky, V. Ryzhikh, A. Savchenko, A. Semenchenko, V. Skuratovsky, D. Timokhi, A. Tkachenko, V. Yurchishin are important for the study of the problem of state control of transport systems.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. A necessary prerequisite for the reliable and efficient functioning of the transport industry is the awareness of the importance of transport for the national security of Ukraine, as well as for the interests of society and every citizen, by representatives of the state authorities and the public. In the difficult conditions of world economic processes in Ukraine and European integration, effective public administration of the transport industry is needed, which would take into account geopolitical aspects in the country, the features of the industry and its role in the processes of economic and social transformations, and would enable its development, ensure competitiveness. That is why the issues of public administration in the transport sector need improvement.Paper main body. The state management of transport activity is carried out by conducting and implementing economic (tax, financial, credit, tariff, investment) and social policies, including provision of subsidies for passenger transportation. The basis of public administration of the transport system is a unified transport policy of Ukraine, which must be closely coordinated with the strategy of socio-economic development of the country.Governing bodies exert managerial influence through legal methods that understand the way management functions are performed in accordance with the requirements of applicable law and legal doctrine. The organizational and legal basis of public transport management is the system of state authorities and local self-government, endowed with managerial competence for transport of Ukraine.Management of the transport system of Ukraine is carried out on a branch-territorial basis. Structural reforms in transport aim at developing and improving market relations, reducing the direct involvement of the state in transport and reducing the monopoly sector.The main purpose of public administration is to exercise executive power, in the process of which the tasks, functions and interests of the state are realized. However, direct management of economic, socio-cultural and administrative-political activities is characterized by administrative activities.The state transport management of Ukraine is based on relevant legal framework, which is divided into regulatory and organizational law.Public administration in the field of transport is carried out by: the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, local Councils of People's Deputies and other specially authorized bodies in accordance with their competence.The Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, the activity of which is directed and coordinated by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, is the main body in the system of central bodies of executive power, which ensures the implementation of the state policy in the field of transport, in the sphere of using the Ukrainian airspace and navigation and hydrographic navigation.Let's briefly consider the main priorities of public administration in the main modes of transport.The State Railway Administration (Ukrzaliznytsia) is a public administration body for public use and a legal entity and reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure.The State Aviation Transport Department (Ukraviatrans) is a public administration body that reports to and acts within the Ministry of Infrastructure.The State Department of Maritime and River Transport (Ukrmorrichflot) is a public administration body in the field of maritime and inland waterway transport, which reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure and operates within it.The State Department of Road Transport (Ukravtotrans) is a public administration body in the field of road transport and operates within and reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine.Public administration in the field of pipeline transport is carried out by the Ministry of Fuel and Energy of Ukraine, as well as local state executive authorities and local self-government bodies within their competence.The governing bodies may exercise only those powers which are within their competence. In the process of exercising their competence, management bodies have the right to issue normative acts, which can be attributed to a legal type of management activity.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. 1. The priorities of public administration in the field of transport are the improvement (reorganization) of organizational-power, executive-administrative activity of public administration bodies.2. The priority functions of public administration in the field of transport are the external manifestation of the properties of the management entity.3. The priority areas of the national public administration system in the field of transport are to improve and align the basic functions of the transport industry with European standards.The prospects for further exploration are the improvement of public administration in all modes of transport, taking into account the entry into the European transport system. ; Розглянуто основні пріоритети та роль вітчизняної системи державного управління в галузі транспорту загалом і за основними видами транспорту зокрема. Доведено провідну роль державного управління в галузі транспорту. Визначено пріоритети державного управління в галузі транспорту, його основні функції та напрями.

It is determined that, firstofall, financial control implies an obligatory existence of subordination relations and rules that must be monitored irrespective of the sphere of financial relations (public financial relations, private financial relations, household finances, etc.); secondly, finance, as an economic category, in the performance of the irfunctions involves the creation of rules that would regulate the processes of formation, distribution and use of financial resources, as well as determine the possibility of influencing the behavior of business entities by the owner of the seresources. Since the serules are not objective and human-created, compliance with them must be monitored, their executors have the ability not to comply with these rules, to change them for their own benefit, etc. It is stated that financial control is a multiform and complicated financial category, the essence of which cannot be limited with practical activity or information system. It permeates allaspects of financial relationships. The purpose, objective sand method sofexercising financial control mayvary depending on the will of the owners of financial resources, but the nature and functions of financial control remain unchanged. Therefore, financial control as a financial category must be considered through a set of characteristics that should revealall the diversity of it sessence, comprehensively reflect and comprehensively coverallaspects of its manifestation. It is substantiated that the essence of financial control as a category of financial relations in the system of public administration is revealed through a set of its characteristics, which represent financial control as an area of scientific and specialized knowledge, as an element of the management system, as a special type of practical activity and as an information system used for the purpose of management. ; Визначено, що, по-перше, фінансовий контроль має на увазі обов'язкову наявність відносин підлеглості та правила, виконання яких необхідно контролювати незалежно від сфери фінансових відносин (державні фінансові відносини, приватні фінансові відносини, фінанси домогосподарств тощо); по-друге, фінанси як економічна категорія в межах виконання своїх функцій передбачають створення правил, які регулювали б процеси формування, розподілу і використання фінансових ресурсів, а також визначали б можливості впливу на поведінку господарюючих суб'єктів з боку власника цих ресурсів. Оскільки ці правила не мають об'єктивного характеру і створюються людиною, дотримання їх необхідно контролювати. Їх виконавці мають можливість не виконувати ці правила, змінювати їх для отримання своєї вигоди тощо. Зазначено, що фінансовий контроль – це багатогранна і складна фінансова категорія, сутність якої не можна обмежувати тільки практичною діяльністю або інформаційною системою. Вона пронизує всі аспекти фінансових відносин. Можуть змінюватися мета, завдання і методи здійснення фінансового контролю залежно від волі власників фінансових ресурсів, але сутність та функції фінансового контролю залишаються незмінними. Тому фінансовий контроль як фінансову категорію необхідно розглядати через сукупність характеристик, які мають розкривати все різноманіття його сутності, всебічно відбивати і комплексно охоплювати всі сторони його прояву. Обґрунтовано, що сутність фінансового контролю як категорії фінансових відносин у системі державного управління розкривається через сукупність його характеристик, що представляють фінансовий контроль як область наукових і спеціальних знань, як елемент системи управління, як особливий вид практичної діяльності та як інформаційну систему, яка використовується з метою управління.

Problem setting. The formation and development of Ukraine as a democratic state, its integration into the world and European structures requires a rethinking of the nature, place and role of public administration under the current conditions at the enterprises of the transport and road complex. The legislation of Ukraine defines the purpose and tasks of the public administration in the field of transport on the principles enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine and sufficiently covered in the legal literature.Along with fuel and energy and raw material complexes, metallurgy, the military industry, transport is a sector of the economy, critical in terms of meeting public needs and ensuring the sustainable operation of the economic complex as a whole. This is reflected in the following:– implementation of transport projects directly touches on the issues of development of productive powers and populated areas, use of natural resources, expenditures of budgets of all levels. Transport infrastructure is one of the most fundraising sectors of the national economy;– transport is objectively an area of increased technogenic risk and increased vulnerability to terrorist attacks. Transport is the second most important source of environmental pollution after energy and one of the main consumers of insoluble natural resources;– decision in the field of transport development is one of the priorities of the state;– wrong decisions in the field of transport development can lead to irreversible negative consequences, disturb the stability of socio-economic development and have threats to the national security of Ukraine.Therefore, the coverage of the main priorities of the national public administration in the field of transport are and will remain relevant.Recent research and publications analysis. Scientific works of V. Andresyuk, L. Artyushin, A. Galchinsky, B. Gurne, Zh. Ziter, O. Ignatenko, V. Lisnichi, A. Lozhachevskaya, G. Mishchenko, V. Opryshko, M. Onishchuk, I. Pakhomov, Y. Paschenko, V. Razvadovsky, V. Ryzhikh, A. Savchenko, A. Semenchenko, V. Skuratovsky, D. Timokhi, A. Tkachenko, V. Yurchishin are important for the study of the problem of state control of transport systems.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. A necessary prerequisite for the reliable and efficient functioning of the transport industry is the awareness of the importance of transport for the national security of Ukraine, as well as for the interests of society and every citizen, by representatives of the state authorities and the public. In the difficult conditions of world economic processes in Ukraine and European integration, effective public administration of the transport industry is needed, which would take into account geopolitical aspects in the country, the features of the industry and its role in the processes of economic and social transformations, and would enable its development, ensure competitiveness. That is why the issues of public administration in the transport sector need improvement.Paper main body. The state management of transport activity is carried out by conducting and implementing economic (tax, financial, credit, tariff, investment) and social policies, including provision of subsidies for passenger transportation. The basis of public administration of the transport system is a unified transport policy of Ukraine, which must be closely coordinated with the strategy of socio-economic development of the country.Governing bodies exert managerial influence through legal methods that understand the way management functions are performed in accordance with the requirements of applicable law and legal doctrine. The organizational and legal basis of public transport management is the system of state authorities and local self-government, endowed with managerial competence for transport of Ukraine.Management of the transport system of Ukraine is carried out on a branch-territorial basis. Structural reforms in transport aim at developing and improving market relations, reducing the direct involvement of the state in transport and reducing the monopoly sector.The main purpose of public administration is to exercise executive power, in the process of which the tasks, functions and interests of the state are realized. However, direct management of economic, socio-cultural and administrative-political activities is characterized by administrative activities.The state transport management of Ukraine is based on relevant legal framework, which is divided into regulatory and organizational law.Public administration in the field of transport is carried out by: the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, local Councils of People's Deputies and other specially authorized bodies in accordance with their competence.The Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, the activity of which is directed and coordinated by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, is the main body in the system of central bodies of executive power, which ensures the implementation of the state policy in the field of transport, in the sphere of using the Ukrainian airspace and navigation and hydrographic navigation.Let's briefly consider the main priorities of public administration in the main modes of transport.The State Railway Administration (Ukrzaliznytsia) is a public administration body for public use and a legal entity and reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure.The State Aviation Transport Department (Ukraviatrans) is a public administration body that reports to and acts within the Ministry of Infrastructure.The State Department of Maritime and River Transport (Ukrmorrichflot) is a public administration body in the field of maritime and inland waterway transport, which reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure and operates within it.The State Department of Road Transport (Ukravtotrans) is a public administration body in the field of road transport and operates within and reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine.Public administration in the field of pipeline transport is carried out by the Ministry of Fuel and Energy of Ukraine, as well as local state executive authorities and local self-government bodies within their competence.The governing bodies may exercise only those powers which are within their competence. In the process of exercising their competence, management bodies have the right to issue normative acts, which can be attributed to a legal type of management activity.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. 1. The priorities of public administration in the field of transport are the improvement (reorganization) of organizational-power, executive-administrative activity of public administration bodies.2. The priority functions of public administration in the field of transport are the external manifestation of the properties of the management entity.3. The priority areas of the national public administration system in the field of transport are to improve and align the basic functions of the transport industry with European standards.The prospects for further exploration are the improvement of public administration in all modes of transport, taking into account the entry into the European transport system. Problem setting. The formation and development of Ukraine as a democratic state, its integration into the world and European structures requires a rethinking of the nature, place and role of public administration under the current conditions at the enterprises of the transport and road complex. The legislation of Ukraine defines the purpose and tasks of the public administration in the field of transport on the principles enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine and sufficiently covered in the legal literature.Along with fuel and energy and raw material complexes, metallurgy, the military industry, transport is a sector of the economy, critical in terms of meeting public needs and ensuring the sustainable operation of the economic complex as a whole. This is reflected in the following:– implementation of transport projects directly touches on the issues of development of productive powers and populated areas, use of natural resources, expenditures of budgets of all levels. Transport infrastructure is one of the most fundraising sectors of the national economy;– transport is objectively an area of increased technogenic risk and increased vulnerability to terrorist attacks. Transport is the second most important source of environmental pollution after energy and one of the main consumers of insoluble natural resources;– decision in the field of transport development is one of the priorities of the state;– wrong decisions in the field of transport development can lead to irreversible negative consequences, disturb the stability of socio-economic development and have threats to the national security of Ukraine.Therefore, the coverage of the main priorities of the national public administration in the field of transport are and will remain relevant.Recent research and publications analysis. Scientific works of V. Andresyuk, L. Artyushin, A. Galchinsky, B. Gurne, Zh. Ziter, O. Ignatenko, V. Lisnichi, A. Lozhachevskaya, G. Mishchenko, V. Opryshko, M. Onishchuk, I. Pakhomov, Y. Paschenko, V. Razvadovsky, V. Ryzhikh, A. Savchenko, A. Semenchenko, V. Skuratovsky, D. Timokhi, A. Tkachenko, V. Yurchishin are important for the study of the problem of state control of transport systems.Highlighting previously unsettled parts of the general problem. A necessary prerequisite for the reliable and efficient functioning of the transport industry is the awareness of the importance of transport for the national security of Ukraine, as well as for the interests of society and every citizen, by representatives of the state authorities and the public. In the difficult conditions of world economic processes in Ukraine and European integration, effective public administration of the transport industry is needed, which would take into account geopolitical aspects in the country, the features of the industry and its role in the processes of economic and social transformations, and would enable its development, ensure competitiveness. That is why the issues of public administration in the transport sector need improvement.Paper main body. The state management of transport activity is carried out by conducting and implementing economic (tax, financial, credit, tariff, investment) and social policies, including provision of subsidies for passenger transportation. The basis of public administration of the transport system is a unified transport policy of Ukraine, which must be closely coordinated with the strategy of socio-economic development of the country.Governing bodies exert managerial influence through legal methods that understand the way management functions are performed in accordance with the requirements of applicable law and legal doctrine. The organizational and legal basis of public transport management is the system of state authorities and local self-government, endowed with managerial competence for transport of Ukraine.Management of the transport system of Ukraine is carried out on a branch-territorial basis. Structural reforms in transport aim at developing and improving market relations, reducing the direct involvement of the state in transport and reducing the monopoly sector.The main purpose of public administration is to exercise executive power, in the process of which the tasks, functions and interests of the state are realized. However, direct management of economic, socio-cultural and administrative-political activities is characterized by administrative activities.The state transport management of Ukraine is based on relevant legal framework, which is divided into regulatory and organizational law.Public administration in the field of transport is carried out by: the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, local Councils of People's Deputies and other specially authorized bodies in accordance with their competence.The Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine, the activity of which is directed and coordinated by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, is the main body in the system of central bodies of executive power, which ensures the implementation of the state policy in the field of transport, in the sphere of using the Ukrainian airspace and navigation and hydrographic navigation.Let's briefly consider the main priorities of public administration in the main modes of transport.The State Railway Administration (Ukrzaliznytsia) is a public administration body for public use and a legal entity and reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure.The State Aviation Transport Department (Ukraviatrans) is a public administration body that reports to and acts within the Ministry of Infrastructure.The State Department of Maritime and River Transport (Ukrmorrichflot) is a public administration body in the field of maritime and inland waterway transport, which reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure and operates within it.The State Department of Road Transport (Ukravtotrans) is a public administration body in the field of road transport and operates within and reports to the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine.Public administration in the field of pipeline transport is carried out by the Ministry of Fuel and Energy of Ukraine, as well as local state executive authorities and local self-government bodies within their competence.The governing bodies may exercise only those powers which are within their competence. In the process of exercising their competence, management bodies have the right to issue normative acts, which can be attributed to a legal type of management activity.Conclusions of the research and prospects for further studies. 1. The priorities of public administration in the field of transport are the improvement (reorganization) of organizational-power, executive-administrative activity of public administration bodies.2. The priority functions of public administration in the field of transport are the external manifestation of the properties of the management entity.3. The priority areas of the national public administration system in the field of transport are to improve and align the basic functions of the transport industry with European standards.The prospects for further exploration are the improvement of public administration in all modes of transport, taking into account the entry into the European transport system. ; Розглянуто основні пріоритети та роль вітчизняної системи державного управління в галузі транспорту загалом і за основними видами транспорту зокрема. Доведено провідну роль державного управління в галузі транспорту. Визначено пріоритети державного управління в галузі транспорту, його основні функції та напрями.

It is determined that, firstofall, financial control implies an obligatory existence of subordination relations and rules that must be monitored irrespective of the sphere of financial relations (public financial relations, private financial relations, household finances, etc.); secondly, finance, as an economic category, in the performance of the irfunctions involves the creation of rules that would regulate the processes of formation, distribution and use of financial resources, as well as determine the possibility of influencing the behavior of business entities by the owner of the seresources. Since the serules are not objective and human-created, compliance with them must be monitored, their executors have the ability not to comply with these rules, to change them for their own benefit, etc. It is stated that financial control is a multiform and complicated financial category, the essence of which cannot be limited with practical activity or information system. It permeates allaspects of financial relationships. The purpose, objective sand method sofexercising financial control mayvary depending on the will of the owners of financial resources, but the nature and functions of financial control remain unchanged. Therefore, financial control as a financial category must be considered through a set of characteristics that should revealall the diversity of it sessence, comprehensively reflect and comprehensively coverallaspects of its manifestation. It is substantiated that the essence of financial control as a category of financial relations in the system of public administration is revealed through a set of its characteristics, which represent financial control as an area of scientific and specialized knowledge, as an element of the management system, as a special type of practical activity and as an information system used for the purpose of management. ; Визначено, що, по-перше, фінансовий контроль має на увазі обов'язкову наявність відносин підлеглості та правила, виконання яких необхідно контролювати незалежно від сфери фінансових відносин (державні фінансові відносини, приватні фінансові відносини, фінанси домогосподарств тощо); по-друге, фінанси як економічна категорія в межах виконання своїх функцій передбачають створення правил, які регулювали б процеси формування, розподілу і використання фінансових ресурсів, а також визначали б можливості впливу на поведінку господарюючих суб'єктів з боку власника цих ресурсів. Оскільки ці правила не мають об'єктивного характеру і створюються людиною, дотримання їх необхідно контролювати. Їх виконавці мають можливість не виконувати ці правила, змінювати їх для отримання своєї вигоди тощо. Зазначено, що фінансовий контроль – це багатогранна і складна фінансова категорія, сутність якої не можна обмежувати тільки практичною діяльністю або інформаційною системою. Вона пронизує всі аспекти фінансових відносин. Можуть змінюватися мета, завдання і методи здійснення фінансового контролю залежно від волі власників фінансових ресурсів, але сутність та функції фінансового контролю залишаються незмінними. Тому фінансовий контроль як фінансову категорію необхідно розглядати через сукупність характеристик, які мають розкривати все різноманіття його сутності, всебічно відбивати і комплексно охоплювати всі сторони його прояву. Обґрунтовано, що сутність фінансового контролю як категорії фінансових відносин у системі державного управління розкривається через сукупність його характеристик, що представляють фінансовий контроль як область наукових і спеціальних знань, як елемент системи управління, як особливий вид практичної діяльності та як інформаційну систему, яка використовується з метою управління.

It is determined that, firstofall, financial control implies an obligatory existence of subordination relations and rules that must be monitored irrespective of the sphere of financial relations (public financial relations, private financial relations, household finances, etc.); secondly, finance, as an economic category, in the performance of the irfunctions involves the creation of rules that would regulate the processes of formation, distribution and use of financial resources, as well as determine the possibility of influencing the behavior of business entities by the owner of the seresources. Since the serules are not objective and human-created, compliance with them must be monitored, their executors have the ability not to comply with these rules, to change them for their own benefit, etc. It is stated that financial control is a multiform and complicated financial category, the essence of which cannot be limited with practical activity or information system. It permeates allaspects of financial relationships. The purpose, objective sand method sofexercising financial control mayvary depending on the will of the owners of financial resources, but the nature and functions of financial control remain unchanged. Therefore, financial control as a financial category must be considered through a set of characteristics that should revealall the diversity of it sessence, comprehensively reflect and comprehensively coverallaspects of its manifestation. It is substantiated that the essence of financial control as a category of financial relations in the system of public administration is revealed through a set of its characteristics, which represent financial control as an area of scientific and specialized knowledge, as an element of the management system, as a special type of practical activity and as an information system used for the purpose of management. ; Визначено, що, по-перше, фінансовий контроль має на увазі обов'язкову наявність відносин підлеглості та правила, виконання яких необхідно контролювати незалежно від сфери фінансових відносин (державні фінансові відносини, приватні фінансові відносини, фінанси домогосподарств тощо); по-друге, фінанси як економічна категорія в межах виконання своїх функцій передбачають створення правил, які регулювали б процеси формування, розподілу і використання фінансових ресурсів, а також визначали б можливості впливу на поведінку господарюючих суб'єктів з боку власника цих ресурсів. Оскільки ці правила не мають об'єктивного характеру і створюються людиною, дотримання їх необхідно контролювати. Їх виконавці мають можливість не виконувати ці правила, змінювати їх для отримання своєї вигоди тощо. Зазначено, що фінансовий контроль – це багатогранна і складна фінансова категорія, сутність якої не можна обмежувати тільки практичною діяльністю або інформаційною системою. Вона пронизує всі аспекти фінансових відносин. Можуть змінюватися мета, завдання і методи здійснення фінансового контролю залежно від волі власників фінансових ресурсів, але сутність та функції фінансового контролю залишаються незмінними. Тому фінансовий контроль як фінансову категорію необхідно розглядати через сукупність характеристик, які мають розкривати все різноманіття його сутності, всебічно відбивати і комплексно охоплювати всі сторони його прояву. Обґрунтовано, що сутність фінансового контролю як категорії фінансових відносин у системі державного управління розкривається через сукупність його характеристик, що представляють фінансовий контроль як область наукових і спеціальних знань, як елемент системи управління, як особливий вид практичної діяльності та як інформаційну систему, яка використовується з метою управління.

Система глобального економічного врядування, так само як і сама глобальна економіка, знаходиться в стані невпинної видозміни. Концепт архітектури глобальної економіки, який повсякчас ототожнюється з існуванням квазі-ієрархічних структур підпорядкування глобальних економічних потенціалів, виявляє свою неспроможність в сучасних умовах. Показано, що режими глобального економічного врядування істотно еволюціонували з післявоєнних років, що стосується всіх його сфер (торгівлі, фінансів, міграції тощо). Аналіз динаміки змін режимів глобального економічного врядування та характерних ознак дозволив дійти декількох висновків. За часів криз більшу роль відіграють установи або держави-лідери, через необхідність досягнення швидшого консенсусу, наявності ресурсів для вирішення проблем, кращу інституціоналізацію. Було доведено, що періоди зміни режимів глобального економічного врядування скорочуються відповідно до скорочення періодів розвитку глобальної економіки. Відбувається перехід від простого мультилатеризму на фоні неолібералізму до гібридних форм в період неосередньовіччя. На основі результатів дослідження простежується циклічність в заміні лідируючого актора глобального економічно врядування: уряди, регіональні об'єднання, неурядові організації (виробники) (міжурядові організації, міжнародні мережі створення вартості, мега-регіональні угоди), що дозволяє спрогнозувати зміни в режимах глобального економічного врядування. Запропоновано, що на сучасному етапі варто окремо розглядати режими глобального економічного врядування в різних його сферах через відсутність єдиних методів та механізмів розв'язання глобальних економічних проблем, водночас по всіх сферах глобального економічного врядування відбувається зсув в сторону гібридних форм врядування на основі перемовин, консенсусу тощо. Відповідне дослідження може бути доповнено аналізом циклічності режимів глобального економічного врядування. ; The system of global economic governance, as well as the global economy itself, is in the state of unceasing change. The concept of the architecture of the global economy, which is always identified with the existence of quasi-hierarchical structures of subordination of global economic potentials, shows its failure in modern conditions. It is shown that the modes of global economic governance have evolved substantially since the postwar period, which is equally true for all its spheres (trade, finance, migration, etc.). The analysis of the dynamics of changes in the regimes of global economic governance and the characteristics of the system allowed to draw several conclusions. During crises, institutions or leading states play a bigger role because of the need to achieve faster consensus, the availability of resources to solve problems, and better institutionalization. It is proved that the periods of change in the modes of global economic governance are shrinking in line with the reduction of the periods of global economy development. There is a transition from simple multilateralism on the background of neo-liberalism to hybrid forms attributed to the neo-medievalism. The results of the study show that the cyclicality in the replacement of the leading actor of global economic governance takes the next form: governments, integration regional unions, non-governmental organizations (producers) (intergovernmental organizations, international value networks, mega-regional agreements, respectively), which allows predicting changes in the modes of global economic governance. It is proposed that at the present stage it is worth considering separately the modes of global economic governance in its various spheres due to the lack of unified methods and mechanisms for solving global economic problems. One can observe a shift towards hybrid forms of governance based on negotiations, consensus, etc in all the spheres of global economic governance. The corresponding research can be supplemented by the analysis of cyclical patterns of global economic governance.

การวจิยัคร้ังน้ีมีวตัถุประสงคเ์พื่อ1)ศึกษาระดบัการบริหารงานตามหลักธรรมาภิบาลและประสิทธิผลการบริหารงาน 2)ศึกษาอิทธิพลของการบริหารงานตามหลกัธรรมาภิบาลที่มีต่อประสิทธิผลการบริหารงาน 3) หาแนวทางพฒั นาการบริหารงานตามหลกัธรรมาภิบาลที่มีต่อประสิทธิผลการบริหารงานของเทศบาลตา บลในจงัหวดัสกลนครกลุ่มตวัอยา่ งที่ใชใ้นการวิจัย เป็ นพนกังานเทศบาลตา บลของเทศบาลตา บลในเขตจงัหวดัสกลนคร ท้งัหมด 65แห่งจา นวน 334คนจากจ านวนประชากร 2007 คนโดยใชแ้บบสอบถามเป็นเครื่องมือในการเก็บรวบรวมขอ้ มูลและสถิติที่ใชใ้นการวเิคราะห์ขอ้ มูลไดแ้ก่ค่าความถี่ค่าร้อยละค่าเฉลี่ยค่าเบี่ยงเบนมาตรฐาน การวิเคราะห์ถดถอยพหุ (Multiple Regression) โดยวธิีการแบบข้นั ตอน (Stepwise) กา หนดระดบั ทางสถิติที่ระดับ .05ผลการวจิยัพบวา่ 1)การบริหารงานตามหลักธรรมาภิบาลของเทศบาลต าบลในเขตจังหวัดสกลนครในภาพรวมอยใู่ นระดบั มาก( X = 3.64) เมื่อพิจารณารายด้าน พบวา่ ดา้นที่มีค่าเฉลี่ยมากที่สุด คือ ด้านหลักนิติธรรม ( X =3.73)รองลงมาคือ ดา้นหลกัการมีส่วนร่วม ( X = 3.71) ด้านหลกัความโปร่งใส ( X =3.64)ดา้นหลกัความคุม้ค่า ( X = 3.63)ด้านหลักความรับผิดชอบ ( X =3.60 )และ ด้านหลักคุณธรรม( X = 3.49) 2)ประสิทธิผลการบริหารงานของเทศบาลต าบลในเขตจังหวัดสกลนครในภาพรวมอยใู่ นระดบั มาก( X = 3.63) เมื่อพิจารณารายดา้น พบวา่ มีประสิทธิผลการบริหารงานอยใู่ นระดบั มาก ทุกดา้น โดยดา้นที่มีค่าเฉลี่ย มากที่สุด คือ ด้านคุณภาพการให้บริการ( X = 3.66) รองลงมาคือ ด้านการพัฒนาองค์การ ( X = 3.65) ด้านประสิทธิภาพของการปฏิบัต ราชการ ( X = 3.61) และด้านประสิทธิผลตามแผนปฏิบัติราชการ ( X = 3.60) 3. วิเคราะห์อิทธิพลของการบริหารงานตามหลกั ธรรมาภิบาลต่อประสิทธิผลการบริหารงานของเทศบาลตา บลในจงัหวดัสกลนคร พบวา่ ปัจจัยบางประการของการบริหารงานตามหลกัธรรมาภิบาลที่มีอิทธิพลต่อประสิทธิผลการบริหารงานอยา่ งมีนยัสา คญั ทางสถิติที่ระดบั .05ไดแ้ก่ปัจจยัเกี่ยวกบัการบริหารงานตามหลกัธรรมาภิบาล5 ดา้น เรียงลา ดบัจากมากไปหานอ้ยไดแ้ก่ ดา้นหลกัความคุม้ค่า มีค่าสัมประสิทธ์ิมากที่สุดเท่ากบั 0.55รองลงมาคือ ดา้นหลกัความรับผดิชอบ มีค่าสัมประสิทธ์ิเท่ากบั0.16 ด้านหลกัคุณธรรม มีค่าสัมประสิทธ์ิเท่ากบั 0.14 ดา้นความโปร่งใส มีค่าสัมประสิทธ์ิเท่ากบั0.10และดา้นหลกัการมีส่วนร่วมมีค่าสัมประสิทธ์ินอ้ยที่สุดเท่ากบั 0.09 โดยค่าสัมประสิทธ์ิสหสัมพนัธ์พหุคูณ หรือ ตวัแปรอิสระท้งัหมดสามารถอธิบายความผนัแปรของตวัแปรตาม (R2)เท่ากบั 0.88และสามารถทา นายค่าสมการของการวิเคราะห์เท่ากบั 0.94และ4. แนวทางการพัฒนาการบริหารงานตามหลักธรรมาภิบาลมีจ านวน 3 ด้าน คือ1) ด้านหลักคุณธรรม 2) ด้านหลักความรับผดิชอบ และ3) ดา้นหลกัความคุม้ค่า ; The objective of this study were to 1)investigate a degree of good governance based onadministration and administrative effectiveness, 2)examine the influence of good governancebased administration on administrative effectiveness, and 3) suggest a way to development of goodgovernance based administration on administrative effectiveness of sub-district municipalities inSakon Nakhon province. A sample used in study was 334 employees of 65 sub-districtmunicipalities in Sakon Nakhon province. The instrument used in data collection was aquestionnaire; and statistics used in data analysis were frequency, percentage, mean, standarddeviation, and stepwise multiple regression analysis. The statistical significance was determined atthe .05 level.Findings of the study were as follows: 1) The overall administration based on theprinciples of good governance of sub-district municipalities in Sakon Nakhon province was at high level ( X = 3.64). Considering as each aspect, the aspect that gained the highest mean score wasthe rule of law principle ( X = 3.73), followed by the participation principle aspect ( X = 3.71), thetransparency principle aspect ( X = 3.64), the value-for- money principle aspect ( X = 3.63), theaccountability principle aspect ( X = 3.60), and the morality principle aspect ( X = 3.49),respectively. 2) The administrative effectiveness of sub-district municipalities in Sakon Nakhonprovince as a whole was at high level ( X = 3.63). Considering as each aspect, all the aspects ofadministrative effectiveness were at high level. The aspect that gained the highest mean score wasof service quality ( X = 3.66), followed by the aspects of organizational development ( X = 3.65),official practice efficiency ( X = 3.61), and effectiveness based on the official practice plan ( X =3.60), respectively. 3) The analysis of influence of good governance based administration onadministrative effectiveness of sub-district municipalities in Sakon Nakhon province found thatsome factors of good governance based administration which had significant influence onadministrative effectiveness at the .05 level were those concerning 5 aspects of principles of goodgovernance based administration as arranged in the following descending order: the value-formoney principle aspect which had the highest co-efficient of 0.55, followed by the accountabilityprinciple aspect which had a coefficient of 0.16, the morality principle aspect which had acoefficient of 0.14, the transparency principle aspect which had a coefficient of 0.10, and theparticipation principle aspect which had the lowest coefficient of 0.09, respectively. The multiplecorrelation coefficient of all the independent variables was able to explain the variance of thedependent variable (R2) with a value of 0.88 and able to make a prediction of the equation value byanalysis equal to 0.94, and 4.Guidelines for developing the good governance based administrationconsist of 3 aspects: 1) morality principle aspect, 2) accountability principle aspect, and 3) valuefor-money principle aspect.

Система глобального економічного врядування, так само як і сама глобальна економіка, знаходиться в стані невпинної видозміни. Концепт архітектури глобальної економіки, який повсякчас ототожнюється з існуванням квазі-ієрархічних структур підпорядкування глобальних економічних потенціалів, виявляє свою неспроможність в сучасних умовах. Показано, що режими глобального економічного врядування істотно еволюціонували з післявоєнних років, що стосується всіх його сфер (торгівлі, фінансів, міграції тощо). Аналіз динаміки змін режимів глобального економічного врядування та характерних ознак дозволив дійти декількох висновків. За часів криз більшу роль відіграють установи або держави-лідери, через необхідність досягнення швидшого консенсусу, наявності ресурсів для вирішення проблем, кращу інституціоналізацію. Було доведено, що періоди зміни режимів глобального економічного врядування скорочуються відповідно до скорочення періодів розвитку глобальної економіки. Відбувається перехід від простого мультилатеризму на фоні неолібералізму до гібридних форм в період неосередньовіччя. На основі результатів дослідження простежується циклічність в заміні лідируючого актора глобального економічно врядування: уряди, регіональні об'єднання, неурядові організації (виробники) (міжурядові організації, міжнародні мережі створення вартості, мега-регіональні угоди), що дозволяє спрогнозувати зміни в режимах глобального економічного врядування. Запропоновано, що на сучасному етапі варто окремо розглядати режими глобального економічного врядування в різних його сферах через відсутність єдиних методів та механізмів розв'язання глобальних економічних проблем, водночас по всіх сферах глобального економічного врядування відбувається зсув в сторону гібридних форм врядування на основі перемовин, консенсусу тощо. Відповідне дослідження може бути доповнено аналізом циклічності режимів глобального економічного врядування. ; The system of global economic governance, as well as the global economy itself, is in the state of unceasing change. The concept of the architecture of the global economy, which is always identified with the existence of quasi-hierarchical structures of subordination of global economic potentials, shows its failure in modern conditions. It is shown that the modes of global economic governance have evolved substantially since the postwar period, which is equally true for all its spheres (trade, finance, migration, etc.). The analysis of the dynamics of changes in the regimes of global economic governance and the characteristics of the system allowed to draw several conclusions. During crises, institutions or leading states play a bigger role because of the need to achieve faster consensus, the availability of resources to solve problems, and better institutionalization. It is proved that the periods of change in the modes of global economic governance are shrinking in line with the reduction of the periods of global economy development. There is a transition from simple multilateralism on the background of neo-liberalism to hybrid forms attributed to the neo-medievalism. The results of the study show that the cyclicality in the replacement of the leading actor of global economic governance takes the next form: governments, integration regional unions, non-governmental organizations (producers) (intergovernmental organizations, international value networks, mega-regional agreements, respectively), which allows predicting changes in the modes of global economic governance. It is proposed that at the present stage it is worth considering separately the modes of global economic governance in its various spheres due to the lack of unified methods and mechanisms for solving global economic problems. One can observe a shift towards hybrid forms of governance based on negotiations, consensus, etc in all the spheres of global economic governance. The corresponding research can be supplemented by the analysis of cyclical patterns of global economic governance.

The purposes of this study are to explore the problems and to outline thedevelopmental plan for the good governance administration of Betong City Municipality.Data were obtained by means of open-ended interview questions, asking about the sixcharacteristics of good governance administration. The research samples were 12 politicaland public administrators of Betong City Municipality. Results revealed that, in general,the good governance characteristics were employed among the administrativepersonnel of Betong City Municipality at an acceptable level. The administrativepeople employed the good governance administrative characteristics: Followingthe Rule of Law, Transparency, Participatory and Effective and Efficient at amoderate level. Problems in employing the good governance administration included 1) the personnel did not have sufficient knowledge related to rule of law; 2) there wasnot sufficient cooperation from the public people; and 3) there were not sufficientchannels to get public opinions to support the good governance administration.Suggestions for improvement of the good governance administration of Betong CityMunicipality obtained from the study included: 1) all levels of personnel at Betong CityMunicipality should be educated on rule of law in the city municipality; 2) the senseof job responsibility should be stimulated and specific jobs should be clearly allocatedto the personnel; 3) people should be more involved in decision making and assessingprocess of the municipality responsibilities; 4) there should be more and better channels for communication with the public; and 5) the municipality personnel should beeducated and trained in using the resources at their most potentials. ; การศึกษาครั้งนี้มีวัตถุประสงค์เพื่อศึกษาถึงปัญหาและแนวทางในการพัฒนาการบริหารองค์กรตามหลักธรรมาภิบาลของเทศบาลเมืองเบตง โดยมีกลุ่มเป้าหมายในการศึกษา 2 กลุ่มได้แก่ คณะผู้บริหารฝ่ายการเมือง และคณะผู้บริหารฝ่ายข้าราชการประจำ จำนวน 12 คนเก็บรวบรวมข้อมูลจากการสัมภาษณ์ โดยใช้แบบสอบถามแบบปลายเปิด สอบถามเกี่ยวกับการบริหารงานตามหลักธรรมาภิบาล ทั้ง 6 หลัก ผลการศึกษาพบว่า บุคลากรได้นำหลักธรรมาภิบาลมาใช้และยึดปฏิบัติตามหลักนิติธรรมได้ระดับหนึ่ง มีความโปร่งใสพอสมควรมีส่วนร่วมในการปฏิบัติหน้าที่ดี และมีความรับผิดชอบพอสมควร โดยสรุปการบริหารงานเทศบาลเมืองเบตงโดยรวมเป็นไปตามหลักธรรมาภิบาล ในส่วนของปัญหาในการบริหารเทศบาลเมืองเบตง คือ 1) เจ้าหน้าที่ยังขาดความรู้ความเข้าใจที่ถูกต้องเกี่ยวกับระเบียบ และกฎหมายที่ปฏิบัติ2) ประชาชนไม่ให้ความร่วมมือกับส่วนราชการเท่าที่ควร 3) ช่องทางในการรับฟังความคิดเห็นจากประชาชนยังมีน้อย สำหรับแนวทางการพัฒนาการบริหารของเทศบาลเมืองเบตง คือ1) ควรส่งเสริมให้ความรู้แก่เจ้าหน้าที่ทุกระดับ 2) สร้างจิตสำนึกความรับผิดชอบต่อหน้าที่การงานและมอบหมายงานให้ชัดเจน 3) ควรให้ประชาชนเข้ามามีส่วนร่วมในการตัดสินใจ และตรวจสอบกระบวนการทำงานมากขึ้น 4) เพิ่มช่องทางในการให้ข้อมูลข่าวสารของทางราชการแก่ประชาชน5) จัดอบรมสร้างจิตสำนึกให้แก่เจ้าหน้าที่ในการใช้ทรัพยากรให้เกิดประโยชน์สูงสุด

The paper analyzed the basic scientifi c approaches to separation of concepts such as «executive» and «governance». Investigated the relationship between these concepts in the former Soviet Union and Europe. ; В статье проанализированы основные подходы ученых к разграничению таких понятий, как «исполнительная власть» и «государственное управление». Исследованы вопросы соотношения указанных понятий в странах бывшего СССР и странах Европы. ; У статті проаналізовано основні підходи науковців до розмежування таких понять, як «виконавча влада» та «державне управління». Досліджено питання їх співвідношення у країнах колишнього СРСР та Європи.